Building Simulation

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 29–39 | Cite as

Investigation on the energy performance of a novel semi-transparent BIPV system integrated with vacuum glazing

  • Changyu Qiu
  • Hongxing YangEmail author
  • Weilong Zhang
Research Article Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling


The development of vacuum glazed windows in recent decades has provided a foreseeable energy saving opportunity in the design of low-energy consumption buildings and the application of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) has experienced rapid development for application in buildings. This paper reports our investigations on the combinations of the vacuum glazing and BIPV integration. Semi-transparent photovoltaic windows can convert solar energy into electricity, but most of absorbed solar heat is transferred into indoor environment which becomes additional cooling load. The proposed vacuum photovoltaic insulated glass unit (VPV IGU) in this paper combines vacuum glazing and solar photovoltaic technologies, which can utilize solar energy and reduce cooling load of buildings at the same time. Various experiments were conducted to evaluate the thermal performance and determine the key characteristics of the VPV IGU in this study. It was found that the VPV IGU can achieve very low total heat gain coefficient (U-value) of around 1.5 W/(m2 K) and block most of undesired solar radiation from penetrating through the window. Compared with a common double-pane glass sheet, the vacuum PV glazing can maintain the indoor environment at a relatively low temperature due to its excellent thermal insulation performance in summer. A detailed simulation study has been conducted by EnergyPlus and Berkeley Lab WINDOW. The simulation work has indicated that the cooling load can be reduced by 14.2% by a south-oriented VPV IGU compared with common glazing products while power generation is not compromised compared with normal BIPV systems. The results show that the application of the VPV IGU has a huge energy saving potential and can minimize the drawback of common PV insulating glass units.


building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) vacuum glazing semi-transparent photovoltaic thermal insulation performance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The work described in this paper is supported by a grant from the Hong Kong Construction Industry Council (Project: K-ZJK1) for developing this technology. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the Hong Kong Construction Industry Council.


  1. Authority (1995). Code of Practice for Overall Thermal Transfer Value in Buildings 1995. Building Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China.Google Scholar
  2. Baetens R, Jelle BP, Gustavsen A (2011). Aerogel insulation for building applications: A state-of-the-art review. Energy and Buildings, 43: 761–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan ALS, Chow TT, Fong SKF, Lin JZ (2006). Generation of a typical meteorological year for Hong Kong. Energy Conversion and Management, 47: 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen X, Yang H, Lu L (2015). A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50: 1425–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chow TT, Qiu Z, Li C (2009). Potential application of “see-through” solar cells in ventilated glazing in Hong Kong. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 93: 230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins RE, Turner GM, Fischer-Cripps AC, Tang J-Z, Simko TM, Dey CJ, Clugston DA, Zhang Q-C, Garrison JD (1995). Vacuum glazing—A new component for insulating windows. Building and Environment, 30: 459–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins RE, Simko TM (1998). Current status of the science and technology of vacuum glazing. Solar Energy, 62: 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins R, Asano O, Misonou M, Katoh H, Nagasaka S (1999). Vacuum glazing: Design options and performance capability. In: Proceedings of Glass in Buildings Conference, Bath, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Cuce E, Cuce PM (2016). Vacuum glazing for highly insulating windows: Recent developments and future prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54: 1345–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cuce E, Riffat SB (2015a). Aerogel-assisted support pillars for thermal performance enhancement of vacuum glazing: A CFD research for a commercial product. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 40: 2233–2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cuce E, Riffat SB (2015b). A state-of-the-art review on innovative glazing technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41: 695–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuce E, Riffat SB, Young CH (2015). Thermal insulation, power generation, lighting and energy saving performance of heat insulation solar glass as a curtain wall application in Taiwan: A comparative experimental study. Energy Conversion and Management, 96: 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EnergyPlus (2018). Available at Scholar
  14. Zoller F (1924). Hollow pane of glass. German Patent No. 387655.Google Scholar
  15. Fang Y, Hyde T, Hewitt N, Eames PC, Norton B (2010a). Thermal performance analysis of an electrochromic vacuum glazing with low emittance coatings. Solar Energy, 84: 516–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fang Y, Hyde TJ, Hewitt N (2010b). Predicted thermal performance of triple vacuum glazing. Solar Energy, 84: 2132–2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fang Y, Hyde TJ, Arya F, Hewitt N (2013). A novel building component hybrid vacuum glazing—A modelling and experimental validation. ASHRAE Transactions, 119(2): 430–441.Google Scholar
  18. Fang Y, Hyde TJ, Arya F, Hewitt N, Eames PC, Norton B, Miller S (2014). Indium alloy-sealed vacuum glazing development and context. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37: 480–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fung TYY, Yang H (2008). Study on thermal performance of semitransparent building-integrated photovoltaic glazings. Energy and Buildings, 40: 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghosh A, Norton B, Duffy A (2016). Measured thermal performance of a combined suspended particle switchable device evacuated glazing. Applied Energy, 169: 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gustavsen A, Jelle BP, Arasteh D, Kohler C (2007). State-of-the-art highly insulating window frames-Research and market review. LBNL Report LBNL-1133E, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hee WJ, Alghoul MA, Bakhtyar B, Elayeb O, Shameri MA, Alrubaih MS, Sopian K (2015). The role of window glazing on daylighting and energy saving in buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42: 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hong Kong Information Services Department (2015). The Hong Kong Year Book 2015. Available at Scholar
  24. Hong T, Langevin J, Sun K (2018). Building simulation: Ten challenges. Building Simulation, Scholar
  25. ISO (2003). ISO 15099:2003. Thermal Performance of Windows, Doors and Shading Devices—Detailed Calculations. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  26. LBNL (2017). WINDOW. Available at Scholar
  27. Li DHW, Lam TNT, Chan WWH, Mak AHL (2009). Energy and cost analysis of semi-transparent photovoltaic in office buildings. Applied Energy, 86: 722–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liao W, Xu S (2015). Energy performance comparison among seethrough amorphous-silicon PV (photovoltaic) glazings and traditional glazings under different architectural conditions in China. Energy, 83: 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lu L, Law KM (2013). Overall energy performance of semi-transparent single-glazed photovoltaic (PV) window for a typical office in Hong Kong. Renewable Energy, 49: 250–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ma T, Yang H, Zhang Y, Lu L, Wang X (2015). Using phase change materials in photovoltaic systems for thermal regulation and electrical efficiency improvement: A review and outlook. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43: 1273–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manz H, Brunner S, Wullschleger L (2006). Triple vacuum glazing: Heat transfer and basic mechanical design constraints. Solar Energy, 80: 1632–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Omer AM (2008). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12: 2265–2300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peng J, Lu L, Yang H (2013). An experimental study of the thermal performance of a novel photovoltaic double-skin facade in Hong Kong. Solar Energy, 97: 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peng J, Lu L, Yang H, Ma T (2015a). Comparative study of the thermal and power performances of a semi-transparent photovoltaic façade under different ventilation modes. Applied Energy, 138: 572–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peng J, Lu L, Yang H, Ma T (2015b). Validation of the Sandia model with indoor and outdoor measurements for semi-transparent amorphous silicon PV modules. Renewable Energy, 80: 316–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peng J, Curcija DC, Lu L, Selkowitz SE, Yang H, Mitchell R (2016a). Developing a method and simulation model for evaluating the overall energy performance of a ventilated semi-transparent photovoltaic double-skin facade. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 24: 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peng J, Curcija DC, Lu L, Selkowitz SE, Yang H, Zhang W (2016b). Numerical investigation of the energy saving potential of a semitransparent photovoltaic double-skin facade in a cool-summer Mediterranean climate. Applied Energy, 165: 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schultz JM, Jensen KI (2008). Evacuated aerogel glazings. Vacuum, 82: 723–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simko T, Collins RE (2014). Vacuum glazing: Development, design challenges and commercialisation. Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 12: 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Skandalos N, Karamanis D (2015). PV glazing technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49: 306–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang M, Peng J, Li N, Lu L, Ma T, Yang H (2016). Assessment of energy performance of semi-transparent PV insulating glass units using a validated simulation model. Energy, 112: 538–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang M, Peng J, Li N, Yang H, Wang C, Li X, Lu T (2017). Comparison of energy performance between PV double skin facades and PV insulating glass units. Applied Energy, 194: 148–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wong PW, Shimoda Y, Nonaka M, Inoue M, Mizuno M (2008). Semi-transparent PV: Thermal performance, power generation, daylight modelling and energy saving potential in a residential application. Renewable Energy, 33: 1024–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Youssef AMA, Zhai ZJ, Reffat RM (2015). Design of optimal building envelopes with integrated photovoltaics. Building Simulation, 8: 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang W, Lu L, Chen X (2016a). Performance evaluation of vacuum photovoltaic insulation glass unit. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Applied Energy, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  46. Zhang W, Lu L, Peng J, Song A (2016b). Comparison of the overall energy performance of semi-transparent photovoltaic windows and common energy-efficient windows in Hong Kong. Energy and Buildings, 128: 511–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang W, Lu L, Peng J (2017). Evaluation of potential benefits of solar photovoltaic shadings in Hong Kong. Energy, 137: 1152–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Renewable Energy Research Group, Department of Building Services EngineeringThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations