, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 596–598 | Cite as

DNA-Extraktion aus mikrobiellen Umweltproben

  • Ramona KuhnEmail author
  • Jörg Böllmann
  • Kathrin Krahl
  • Isaac Mbir Bryant
  • Marion Martienssen
Wissenschaft · Methoden Methodenvergleich


We compared the efficiency of ten selected DNA extraction procedures for microbes published in recent literature using four different environmental samples. The suitability was assessed based on DNA yield, visual quality, as well as PCR applicability. Four out of ten extraction procedures were found applicable to all tested environmental samples. All tested procedures were cheaper compared to commercial DNA extraction kits.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Young JM, Rawlence NJ, Weyrich LS et al. (2014) Limitation and recommendations for successful DNA extraction from forensic soil samples: A review. Sci Justice 54:238–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Guthrie JN, Moriarty DJW, Blackall LL (2000) DNA extraction from coral reef sediment bacteria for the polymerase chain reaction. J Microbiol Methods 43:73–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bourrain M, Achouak W, Urbain V et al. (1999) DNA extraction from activated sludge. Curr Microbiol 38:315–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Wilson IG (1997) Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3741–3751PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kuhn R, Böllmann J, Krahl K et al. (2017) Comparison of ten different DNA extraction procedures with respect to their suitability for environmental samples. J Microbiol Method 143:78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Lemarchand K, Berthiaume F, Maynard C, et al. (2005) Optimization of microbial DNA extraction and purification from raw wastewater samples for downstream pathogen detection by microarrays. J Microbiol Methods 63:115–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Kuhn R, Böllmann J, Krahl K et al. (2018) Data on DNA gel sample load, gel electrophoresis, PCR and cost analysis. Data in Brief 16:732–751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Tabatabaei M, Zakaria MR, Rahim RA et al. (2010) Comparative study of methods for extraction and purification of environmental DNA from high-strength wastewater sludge. Afr J Biotechnol 9:4926–4937Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Gabor ME, de Vries EJ, Janssen DB (2003) Efficient recovery of environmental DNA for expression cloning by indirect extraction methods. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 44:153–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Shan G, Jin W, Lam EK et al. (2008) Purification of total DNA extracted from activated sludge. J Environ Sci 20:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Orsini M, Romano-Spica V (2001) A microwave-based method for nucleic acid isolation from environmental samples. Lett Appl Microbiol 33:17–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Singka D, Kumdhitiahutsawakul L, Rekkriangkrai P et al. (2012) A simple method for DNA extraction from activated sludge. Chiang Mai J Sci 39:111–118Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Tresse O, Lorrain MJ, Rho D (2002) Population dynamics of free-floating and attached bacteria in a styrene-degrading biotrickling filter analyzed by denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Microbiol Biot 59:585–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramona Kuhn
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jörg Böllmann
    • 1
  • Kathrin Krahl
    • 1
  • Isaac Mbir Bryant
    • 1
  • Marion Martienssen
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut Für Umwelt- Und VerfahrenstechnikLehrstuhl Biotechnologie Der Wasseraufbereitung, Btu Cottbus-SenftenbergCottbusDeutschland
  2. 2.Institut für Umwelt- Und VerfahrenstechnikBrandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus-SenftenbergCottbusDeutschland

Personalised recommendations