Advertisement

MRI Before Fistula Surgery: Will It Change the Operation?—a Prospective Study

  • Rajkumar JS
  • Dharmendra KR
  • Anirudh Rajkumar
  • Akbar Syed
  • Nabeel Nazeer
  • Jayakrishna A. Reddy
  • Hema Tadimari
  • Shreya Rajkumar
Review Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

The last word in anal fistula surgery has not been written. The literature is unclear on which patient should undergo a pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]. Most guidelines are clear that complex and recurrent fistulae, or those with a background of inflammatory bowel disease, should undergo an MRI evaluation, but otherwise the guidelines are hazy and ill defined. In this study, over a 3-month period, all patients who clinically presented with anal fistula underwent MRI of the ano-rectal region. The clinical findings on digital rectal examination [DRE] were compared to the final radiological diagnosis, and the peri-operative findings. The fidelity of the MRI diagnosis was the endpoint of the analysis, as was the impact on the operative strategy. A change in operative course was brought about by the MRI, in a percentage of 16.1% which is quite significant. None of the patients had an endo-anal ultrasound as it is not part of our protocol. It is concluded that the addition of the MRI changed the surgical approach in a significant proportion of patients with fistula in ano and consequently it is now part of our regular workup of every anal fistula patient, to do an MRI preoperatively. By adding MRI, our recurrence rates came down significantly which is quite evident in the follow-up.

Keywords

Anal fistula DRE MRI Endo anal ultrasound 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the following people: Saravanan A, Academic Secretary, LifeLine Institute of Minimal Access, Chennai. Dr. Deepa T., MD., Consultant Radiologist, Medall Diagnostics, Chennai. Dr. Chitra A., MD., Prof. of Community Medicine, Madras Medical College, Chennai.

References

  1. 1.
    Parks AG (1961) Pathogenesis and treatment of fistula-in-ano. Br Med J 1(5224):463–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. BJS 63(1):1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van BB, Grandin C, Kartheuser A, Hoang P, Mahieu P, Detry R, Vanheuverzwijn R, Pringot J (1994) MRI of complicated anal fistulae: comparison with digital examination. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18(1):87–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perini L, Marcon M, Bidoli L, Fabris G, Ferraro B, Cavallo A, Zacchi C (1995) Magnetic resonance in the assessment of perianal fistula. La Radiologia Medica 89(5):637–642PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spencer JA, Chapple K, Wilson D, Ward J, Windsor AC, Ambrose NS (1998) Outcome after surgery for perianal fistula: predictive value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171(2):403–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spencer JA, Ward J, Beckingham IJ, Adams C, Ambrose NS (1996) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of perianal fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167(3):735–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barker PG, Lunniss PJ, Armstrong P, Reznek RH, Cottam K, Phillips RK (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano: technique, interpretation and accuracy. Clin Radiol 49(1):7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, van der Hoop AG, Kessels AG, Vliegen RF, Baeten CG, van Engelshoven JM (2001) Preoperative MR imaging of anal fistulas: does it really help the surgeon? Radiology 218(1):75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lunniss PJ, Armstrong P, Barker PG, Reznek RH, Phillips RK (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging of anal fistulae. Lancet 340(8816):394–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buchanan G, Halligan S, Williams A, Cohen CR, Tarroni D, Phillips RK, Bartram CI (2002) Effect of MRI on clinical outcome of recurrent fistula-in-ano. Lancet 360(9346):1661–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morris J, Spencer JA (2000) Ambrose NS. MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics 20(3):623–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Koperen PJ, Horsthuis K, Bemelman WA, Stoker J, Slors JF (2008) Perianal fistulas: developments in the classification and diagnostic techniques, and a new treatment strategy. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 152(51–52):2774–2780PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grandjean JP, Daville O, Henry L, Milox B, Tissot O, Valette PJ. Magnetic resonance study of complex anal fistulae. Preliminary results apropos of 28 cases. In Annales de chirurgie 1997 (Vol 51, No 4, pp 314–317)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hussain SM, Stoker J, Schouten WR, Hop WC, Laméris JS (1996) Fistula in ano: endoanal sonography versus endoanal MR imaging in classification. Radiology 200(2):475–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Surgeons of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General & Laparoscopic SurgeryLifeLine Institute of Minimal Access (LIMA)ChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations