Non-operative Management of Patients with Right Side Thoracoabdominal Penetrating Injuries: a Single-Center Retrospective Study
We aimed to put forward the feasibility and clinically safety of non-operative management (NOM) of right side thoracoabdominal (RST) penetrating injuries for appropriate patient groups. Medical records of 55 patients with RST penetrating injuries who were admitted to Istanbul School of Medicine, Trauma and Emergency Surgery Department between March 2011 and August 2016 were examined. We have done the follow-up of RST penetrating injured patients who were hemodynamically stable by NOM. Most of the patients had liver and lung injuries confirmed by CT scans. The evaluations were done accordingly by taking patients’ past medical history, plain radiograph, and computed tomography (CT). Exclusion criteria were bilateral thoracoabdominal injuries, hemodynamic instability, and signs of peritonitis. Fifty-four of the patients were male and one patient was female (female/male = 1/54). Since 12 of the patients had undergone operations due to various causes, they were excluded from the study. A total of 43 patients were included into the study. The average age of the patients was calculated as 26.6 years (range 13–53 years). Average length of hospital stay was 6 days. Median follow-up time of the patients who were managed non-operatively was 2.6 years (range 5–72 months). Thirteen of the patients were gunshot injured, though they were followed up by conservative approach also. The liver is present on the right side of upper abdomen and therefore, its presence acts as an anatomical barrier for trauma towards the right hemi-diaphragm. It also helps the right-sided diaphragm injuries to heal spontaneously over time mostly without secondary hernia. Because of that, NOM of RST penetrating injuries is safe and feasible for selected patient groups. Also, it can reduce morbidity and mortality rates by preventing unnecessary interventions.
KeywordsThoracic Liver/pancreas General laparoscopy Hernia
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Toutouzas KG, Sarkisyan G, Chan LS, Ishak R, Alo K, Vassiliu P, Murray JA, Salim A, Asensio J, Belzberg H, Katkhouda N, Berne TV (2001) Selective nonoperative management of 1856 patients with abdominal gunshot wound: should routine laparotomy still be the standard of care? Ann Surg 234:395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ain Atif QA, Khaliq T (2016) Traumatic right diaphragmatic hernia; a delayed presentation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 28(3):625–626Google Scholar
- 8.Jee Y (2017) Laparoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) for delayed traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 12(2):189–193Google Scholar
- 9.Wakai S, Otsuka H, Aoki H, Yamagiwa T, Nakagawa Y, Inokuchi S (2017) A case of incarcerated and perforated stomach in delayed traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 42(2):85–88Google Scholar
- 11.Lim BL, Teo LT, Chiu MT, Asinas-Tan ML, Seow E (2016) Traumatic diaphragmatic injuries: a retrospective review of the 12-year experience at a tertiary trauma centre. Singap Med J 58:1–16Google Scholar
- 13.Williams M, Carlin AM, Tyburski JG et al (2004) Predictors of mortality in patients with traumatic diaphragmatic rupture and associated thoracic and/or abdominal injuries. Am Surg 70:157–162Google Scholar
- 15.Goh BK, Wong AS, Tay KH, Hoe MN (2004) Delayed presentation of a patient with a ruptured diaphragm complicated by gastric incarceration and perforation after apparently minor blunt trauma. Can J Emerg Medicine 6:277–280Google Scholar