Indian Journal of Surgery

, Volume 81, Issue 4, pp 317–319 | Cite as

Non-operative Management of Patients with Right Side Thoracoabdominal Penetrating Injuries: a Single-Center Retrospective Study

  • Recep Erçin SönmezEmail author
  • Mehmet Ilhan
  • Ali Fuat Kaan Gök
  • Hakan Teoman Yanar
  • Mustafa Kayıhan Günay
  • Cemalettin Ertekin
Original Article


We aimed to put forward the feasibility and clinically safety of non-operative management (NOM) of right side thoracoabdominal (RST) penetrating injuries for appropriate patient groups. Medical records of 55 patients with RST penetrating injuries who were admitted to Istanbul School of Medicine, Trauma and Emergency Surgery Department between March 2011 and August 2016 were examined. We have done the follow-up of RST penetrating injured patients who were hemodynamically stable by NOM. Most of the patients had liver and lung injuries confirmed by CT scans. The evaluations were done accordingly by taking patients’ past medical history, plain radiograph, and computed tomography (CT). Exclusion criteria were bilateral thoracoabdominal injuries, hemodynamic instability, and signs of peritonitis. Fifty-four of the patients were male and one patient was female (female/male = 1/54). Since 12 of the patients had undergone operations due to various causes, they were excluded from the study. A total of 43 patients were included into the study. The average age of the patients was calculated as 26.6 years (range 13–53 years). Average length of hospital stay was 6 days. Median follow-up time of the patients who were managed non-operatively was 2.6 years (range 5–72 months). Thirteen of the patients were gunshot injured, though they were followed up by conservative approach also. The liver is present on the right side of upper abdomen and therefore, its presence acts as an anatomical barrier for trauma towards the right hemi-diaphragm. It also helps the right-sided diaphragm injuries to heal spontaneously over time mostly without secondary hernia. Because of that, NOM of RST penetrating injuries is safe and feasible for selected patient groups. Also, it can reduce morbidity and mortality rates by preventing unnecessary interventions.


Thoracic Liver/pancreas General laparoscopy Hernia 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Como JJ, Bokhari F, Chiu WC, Duane TM, Holevar MR, Tandoh MA, Ivatury RR, Scalea TM (2010) Practice management guidelines for selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma. J Trauma 68:721–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wohlgemut JM, Jansen JO (2013) The principles of non-operative management of penetrating abdominal injury. Trauma 15:289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Toutouzas KG, Sarkisyan G, Chan LS, Ishak R, Alo K, Vassiliu P, Murray JA, Salim A, Asensio J, Belzberg H, Katkhouda N, Berne TV (2001) Selective nonoperative management of 1856 patients with abdominal gunshot wound: should routine laparotomy still be the standard of care? Ann Surg 234:395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Inaba K, Demetriades D (2007) The nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma. Adv Surg 41:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DuBose J, Inaba K, Teixeira PG et al (2007) Selective nonoperative management of solid organ injury following abdominal gunshot wounds. Injury 38:1084–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kong VY, Liu M, Sartorius B, Clarke DL (2015) Open pneumothorax: the spectrum and outcome of management based on Advanced Trauma Life Support recommendations. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 41:401–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ain Atif QA, Khaliq T (2016) Traumatic right diaphragmatic hernia; a delayed presentation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 28(3):625–626Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jee Y (2017) Laparoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) for delayed traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 12(2):189–193Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wakai S, Otsuka H, Aoki H, Yamagiwa T, Nakagawa Y, Inokuchi S (2017) A case of incarcerated and perforated stomach in delayed traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 42(2):85–88Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guner A, Ozkan OF, Bekar Y, Kece C, Kaya U, Reis E (2012) Management of delayed presentation of a right-side traumatic diaphragmatic rupture. World J Surg 36:260–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lim BL, Teo LT, Chiu MT, Asinas-Tan ML, Seow E (2016) Traumatic diaphragmatic injuries: a retrospective review of the 12-year experience at a tertiary trauma centre. Singap Med J 58:1–16Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scharff JR, Naunheim KS (2007) Traumatic diaphragmatic injuries. Thorac Surg Clin 17:81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williams M, Carlin AM, Tyburski JG et al (2004) Predictors of mortality in patients with traumatic diaphragmatic rupture and associated thoracic and/or abdominal injuries. Am Surg 70:157–162Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vilallonga R, Pastor V, Alvarez L, Charco R, Armengo M, Navarro S (2011) Right-sided diaphragmatic rupture after blunt trauma. An unusual entity. Vilallonga et al. World J Emerg Surg 6:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goh BK, Wong AS, Tay KH, Hoe MN (2004) Delayed presentation of a patient with a ruptured diaphragm complicated by gastric incarceration and perforation after apparently minor blunt trauma. Can J Emerg Medicine 6:277–280Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Surgeons of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Recep Erçin Sönmez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mehmet Ilhan
    • 2
  • Ali Fuat Kaan Gök
    • 2
  • Hakan Teoman Yanar
    • 2
  • Mustafa Kayıhan Günay
    • 2
  • Cemalettin Ertekin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryIstanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of MedicineIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Medical FacultyIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations