Comparing Hemodynamic Symptoms and the Level of Abdominal Pain in High- Versus Low-Pressure Carbon Dioxide in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
The laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard to treat gallstone. To view the surgical site in this type of operations better, carbon dioxide is used with a certain pressure. The current study aimed to compare the hemodynamic symptoms and the level of abdominal pain due to using high- and low-pressure carbon dioxide in patients undergoing LC. The current double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients with the age range of 20–70 years old undergoing LC. The first and second groups experienced PaCO2 of 7–10 and 12–14 mmHg, respectively. The hemodynamic symptoms, abdominal pain, shoulder-tip pain, nausea and vomiting after the surgery, and the mean of liver function tests were evaluated. Data were analyzed using T test, Chi-square test, and repeated measures ANOVA by SPSS 16. Information of 60 patients in two groups was analyzed. There was a significant difference between the groups regarding the mean of systolic blood pressure (P < 0.05). The mean of heart rate was significantly higher in the high-pressure group during surgery and 1 h after that (P < 0.05). The frequency of pain in shoulder-tip and abdomen was higher in the high-pressure group. Frequency of nausea and vomiting 12 h after the surgery between two groups was significant (P < 0.05). The mean of alkaline phosphatase was higher in the low-pressure group than the high-pressure group (P < 0.05). Considering the good performance and low side effects of low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to those of high-pressure, this method can be replaced by high-pressure in LC.
KeywordsLaparoscopic cholecystectomy Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum High-pressure pneumoperitoneum Gallstone
Authors of this paper are thankful for the valuable cooperation of the Clinical Research Development Unit of Velayat hospital in Qazvin province, Iran.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The current study was registered in the Iranian Clinical Trial Registry (code number: IRCT2014121420309N1).
This report received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Brunicardi CF, Andersen DK, Billiar TR et al (2005) Schwartz’s principles of surgery. Vol 2. 8th ed. McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 1194–1204Google Scholar
- 13.Imani F, Nezafati M, Heidarian M et al (2012) Effect of single dose premedication with pregabaline on pain after minor surgery(Persian). J Anesth Pain 2(8):180–185Google Scholar
- 15.Al-Dabbagh A, Ismaeel NH (2010) Randomized, prospective comparison of post-operative pain in low- versus high-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Zanco J Med Sci 14(2):35–40 http://www.zjms-hmu.org/files/articles/280211014423.pdf Google Scholar
- 16.Sayadi S, Ebrahimi M, Khalilian A et al (2013) Effect of different carbon dioxide pressure on liver enzyme in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. J MazandaranUniv Med Sci 23(98):92–96Google Scholar
- 17.Hasukiæ S (2005) Postoperative changes in liver function tests: randomized comparisons of low and high pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SurgEndosc 19:1451–1455Google Scholar