Advertisement

Pathology & Oncology Research

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 289–299 | Cite as

Cancer-Specific Survival Stratification Derived from Tumor Expression of Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-2 in Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

  • Pastora BeardoEmail author
  • David Truan Cacho
  • Laura Izquierdo
  • Joan Bautista Alcover-Garcia
  • Antonio Alcaraz
  • Javier Extramiana
  • Carmen Mallofré
Original Article

Abstract

Degradation of the extracellular matrix is a prerequisite for the processes of cancer cell invasion and metastasis. The purpose of our study was to assess the association of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9) and their inhibitors (TIMP-1 and TIMP-2) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) progression and cancer-specific survival (CSS), using immunohistochemical analysis of 60 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of tumor tissue and normal tissue near the tumor from surgical T1-3bN0 M0 RCC specimens. Significant overexpression of MMP-2 in tumor and normal tissue was correlated with advanced stages, tumor size, sarcomatous differentiation and clinical symptoms. Overall survival was 31.7% (55.2% M0, 9.7% M1) and CSS 56.7% (100% M0, 16.1% M1) with a follow-up of 76 (5–230) months. Fuhrman grade [HR 2.87 (95% CI: 1.28–6.45); p = 0.01], tumor size [HR 1.13 (95% CI: 1.03–1.26); p = 0.009] and low TIMP-2 expression [HR 0.35 (95% CI: 0.16–0.78); p = 0.01] were independent predictive factors of CSS and stratified the patients into three groups with different rates of 10-year CSS; [100%, 73.9% and 20.5% for the good, intermediate and poor prognosis group respectively (p = 0.000006)] . This study offers strong evidence that TIMP-2 expression in tumor tissue may play a crucial role in progression and poor prognosis in human localized and locally advanced RCC.

Keywords

Matrix metalloproteinases Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases Renal cell carcinoma, Metastasis, Survival 

References

  1. 1.
    Bourboulia D, Stetler-Stevenson WG (2010) Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs): positive and negative regulators in tumor cell adhesion. Semin Cancer Biol 20:161–168Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cho NH, Shim HS, Rha SY, Kang SH, Hong SH, Choi ID et al (2003) Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 correlates with poor prognostic variables renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 44:560–566Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA (Eds) (2004) World health organization classification of tumors. Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. IARC Press. Lyon, France, pp16–18Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edge SB, Compton CC (2009) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edn. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 547–560Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C (1982) Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 6:655–663Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hagemann T, Gunawan B, Schulz M, Füzesi L, Binder C (2001) mRNA expression of matrix metalloproteases and their inhibitors differs in subtypes of renal cell carcinomas. Eur J Urol 37:1839–1846Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hemmerlein B, Johanns U, Halbfass J, Böttcher T, Heuser M, Radzun HJ et al (2004) The balance between MMP-2/−9 and TIMP-1/2 is shifted towards MMP in renal cell carcinomas and can be further disturbed by hydrogen peroxide. Int J Oncol 24(5):1069–1076Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2012. Kidney - estimated incidence, all ages: both sexes. http://globocan.iarc.fr/old/summary_table_site-html.asp?selection=10210&title=Kidney&sex=0&type=0&window=1&africa=1&america=2&asia=3&europe=4&oceania=5&build=6&sort=0&submit=%C2%A0Execute%C2%A0. Accessed 29 Apr 2016
  9. 9.
    Kallakury BVS, Karikehalli S, Haholu A, Sheehan CE, Azumi N, Ross JS (2001) Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases 1 and 2 correlate with poor prognostic variables in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 7:3113–3119Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kawata N, Nagane Y, Hirakata H, Ichinose T, Okada Y, Yamaguchi K et al (2007) Significant relationship of matrix metalloproteinase 9 with nuclear grade and prognostic impact of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 for incidental clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Urology 69(6):1049–1043Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klein T, Bischoff R (2011) Physiology and pathophysiology of matrix metalloproteases. Amino Acids 41:271–290Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kugler A, Hemmerlein B, Thelen M, Kallerhof M, Radzun HJ, Ringert RH (1998) Expression of metalloproteinases 2 and 9 and their inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 160:1914–1918Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lein M, Jung K, Laube C, Hübner T, Winkelmann B, Stephan C et al (2000) Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in plasma and tumor tissue of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 85:801–804Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin H, Pan JC, Zhang FM, Huang B, Chen X, Zhuang JT et al (2015) Matrix metalloproteinase-9 is required for vasculogenic mimicry by clear renal carcinoma cells. Urol Oncol 33(4):168 e9-16Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liotta LA (1986) Tumor invasion and Metastases-Role of Extracellular Matrix: Rhoads Memorial Award Lecture. Cancer Res 46(1):1–7Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lu H, Yang Z, Zhang H, Gan M, Zhou T, Wang S (2013) The expression and clinical significance of matrix metalloproteinase 7 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases 2 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Exp Ther Med 5(3):890–896Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lu H, Cao X, Zhang H, Sun G, Fan G, Chen L et al (2014) Imbalance between MMP-2, 9 and TIMP-1 promote the invasion and metastasis of renal cell carcinoma via SKP2 signaling pathways. Tumor Biol 35(10):9807–9813Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miyake H, Nishikawa M, Tei H, Furukawa J, Harada K, Fujisawa M (2014) Significance of circulating matrix metalloproteinase-9 to tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 ratio as a predictor of disease progression in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib. Urol Oncol 32(5):548–548Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ohba K, Miyata Y, Koga S, Kanda S, Kanetake H (2005) Expression of nm23-H1 product in sarcomatous cancer cells of renal cell carcinoma: correlation with tumor stage and expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2, matrix metalloproteinase-9, sialyl Lewis X, and c-erbB-2. Urology 65(5):1029–1034Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pozzi A, LeVine WF, Gardner HA (2002) Low plasma levels of matrix metalloproteinase 9 permit increased tumor angiogenesis. Oncogene 21:272–281Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Quiao ZK, Li YL, Lu HT, Wang KL, Xu WH (2013) Expression of tissue levels of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in renal cell carcinoma. World J Sur Oncol 3(11):1–6Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Slaton JW, Inoue K, Perrotte P, El-Naggar AK, Swanson DA, Fidler IJ et al (2001) Expression levels of genes that regulate metastasis and angiogenesis correlate with advanced pathological stage of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Pathol 158(2):735–743Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sun M, Shariat SF, Cheng C, Ficarra V, Murai M, Oudard S et al (2011) Prognostic Factors and Predictive Models in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Contemporary Review. Eur Urol 60:644–661Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Takahashi M, Oka N, Narroda T, Nishitani MA, Kanda K, Kanayama HO et al (2002) Prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinases-2 activation ratio in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 9(10):531–538Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Walther MM, Kleiner DE, Lubensky IA, Pozzatti R, Nyguen T, Gnarra JR et al (1997) Progelatinase A mRNA expression in cell lines derived from tumors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma correlates inversely with survival. Urology 50:295–301Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang SD, Sun RC, Mu HJ, Xu ZQ, Zhou ZY (2010) The expression and clinical significance of TGF-beta 1 and MMP2 in human renal clear cell carcinoma. Int J Surg Pathol 18(2):85–93Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Arányi Lajos Foundation 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyAraba University HospitalVitoria-GasteizSpain
  2. 2.Department of UrologyMarques de Valdecilla University HospitalSantanderSpain
  3. 3.Department of UrologyClínic HospitalBarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Department of PathologyUniversitat Autonoma of Barcelona and Clinic HospitalBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations