The effect of antenna polarization and body morphology on the measurement uncertainty of a wearable multi-band distributed exposure meter
- 63 Downloads
This paper studies the effect of antenna polarization on measurement uncertainty of a multi-band body-worn distributed exposure meter (BWDM). The BWDM is a device for assessing electromagnetic fields in real environments accurately. The BWDM consists of 8 nodes and is calibrated on the body for simultaneous measurement of the incident power density in four frequency bands. Each node contains an antenna that can have two potential antenna polarizations.The BWDM is calibrated on four human subjects in an anechoic chamber to determine its measurement uncertainty in terms of 68% confidence interval (CI68) of the on-body antenna aperture. The results show that using a fixed polarization of the antennas on body can lead to a different CI68 up to maximum 4.9 dB when worn by another person which is still 9.6 dB lower than the measurement uncertainty of commercial exposure meters.
KeywordsRF exposure Personal exposure meters Polarization dependency Body morphology Measurement uncertainty
This research was funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) under grant agreement no. G003415N and the French National Research Program for Environmental and Occupational Health of ANSES (2015/2 RF/07) as part of project ACCEDERA. A.T. has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 665501 with the FWO. A.T. is an FWO [PEGASUS]2 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow. S.A. is a Post-Doctoral Fellow of the FWO.
- 1.World Health Organization (WHO). Radio frequency (RF) fields research agenda. http://www.who.int/peh-emf/research/agenda/en/ accessed on 15 February 2018
- 2.Eeftens M, Struchen B, Birks LE, Cardis E, Estarlich M, Fernandez MF, Gajšek P., Gallastegi M, Huss A, Kheifets L, Meder IK, Olsen J, Torrent M, Trček T., Valič B., Vermeulen R, Vrijheid M, van Wel L, Guxens M, Röösli M. (2018) Personal exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields in europe: is there a generation gap? Environ Int 121:216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Gryz K, Zradziński P, Karpowicz J (2015) The role of the location of personal exposimeters on the human body in their use for assessing exposure to the electromagnetic field in the radiofrequency range 98–2450 MHz and compliance analysis: evaluation by virtual measurements, BioMed research international 2015 Google Scholar
- 11.López AN, Gonzalez-Rubio J, Montoya JMV, Garde EA (2015) Using multiple exposimeters to evaluate the influence of the body when measuring personal exposition to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, COMPEL. The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering 34(4):1063. https://doi.org/10.1108/COMPEL-10-2014-0268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Aminzadeh R, Thielens A, Agneessens S, Van Torre P, Van den Bossche M, Dongus S, Eeftens M, Huss A, Vermeulen R, de Seze R, Mazet P, Cardis E, Rogier H, Röösli M., Martens L, Joseph W (2018) A multi-band body-worn distributed radio-frequency exposure meter: Design, on-body calibration and study of body morphology. Sensors 18(272):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010272 Google Scholar
- 18.Agneessens S (2017) Coupled eighth-mode substrate integrated waveguide antenna: Small and wideband with high-body antenna isolation, IEEE AccessGoogle Scholar
- 19.International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) (1998) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 Hz). Health Phys 74(4):494Google Scholar
- 23.Aminzadeh R, Thielens A, Gaillot DP, Lienard M, Agneessens S, Torre PV, den Bossche MV, Rogier H, Röösli M, Martens L, Joseph W (2018). In: 2018 2nd URSI Atlantic Radio Science Meeting (AT-RASC), pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.23919/URSI-AT-RASC.2018.8471583
- 24.Narda Safety Test Solutions. Electric and Magnetic Field Measurement, NBM Series Probes., EF0391: Economical field probe for universal frequency range. 100 kHz - 3 GHz (2016). NBM-Probes: DataSheetGoogle Scholar