Advertisement

Robust Lane-Change Recognition Based on An Adaptive Hidden Markov Model Using Measurement Uncertainty

  • Seungjin Park
  • Wonteak Lim
  • Myoungho SunwooEmail author
Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Lane-changing of surrounding vehicles is a risky situation because vehicle accidents can be easily caused by driver’s unawareness of the surrounding vehicle. Much research has conducted on lane-change recognition (LCR) to avoid these vehicle accidents by warning drivers. LCR is a technology to estimate lane-changing behaviors of surrounding vehicles from observation data: position, velocity, and lane information. Since these observation data change continuously during lanechanging, most research for LCR has used time series data based on hidden Markov model (HMM). A challenging point of LCR is that HMM could make false positives in LCR when the observation data include uncertainties such as sensor noise and object detection error. Previous research has tried to process observation data by using Bayesian filter. However, the approach cannot remove all data uncertainties. This paper proposes a method for using observation uncertainty through an adaptive HMM for LCR. In the method, HMM models are modified in real time based on data covariance to filter data with high uncertainty. For evaluation of the algorithm, it was tested through 71 lane-changing cases in real driving situations. The results show that the proposed method enhanced the recognition accuracy by 25.3 % (63.3 % → 88.7 %) than a previous LCR method.

Key Words

Lane-change recognition Hidden Markov model Automotive applications Observation uncertainty 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bener, A., Yildirim, E., Özkan, T. and Lajunen, T. (2017). Driver sleepiness, fatigue, careless behavior and risk of motor vehicle crash and injury: Population based case and control study. J. Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 45, 496–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bilmes, J. A. (1998). A gentle tutorial of the EM algorithm and its application to parameter estimation for Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models. Int. Computer Science Institute, 4510, 1–13.Google Scholar
  3. Jang, C. H., Kim, C. S., Jo, K. C. and Sunwoo, M. (2017). Design factor optimization of 3D flash lidar sensor based on geometrical model for automated vehicle and advanced driver assistance system applications. Int. J. Automotive Technology, 181, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jo, K., Lee, M., Kim, J. and Sunwoo, M. (2017). Tracking and behavior reasoning of moving vehicles based on roadway geometry constraints. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems, 182, 460–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kuge, N., Yamamura, T., Shimoyama, O. and Liu, A. (2000). A driver behavior recognition method based on a driver model framework. SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0349.Google Scholar
  6. Kumar, P., Perrollaz, M., Lefevre, S. and Laugier, C. (2013). Learning-based approach for online lane change intention prediction. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. (IV), Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
  7. Laugier, C., Paromtchik, I. E., Perrollaz, M., Yong, M., Yoder, J.-D., Tay, C., Mekhnacha, K. and Nègre, A. (2011). Probabilistic analysis of dynamic scenes and collision risks assessment to improve driving safety. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 34, 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu, P., Kurt, A., Redmill, K. and Ozguner, U. (2015). Classification of Highway Lane Change Behavior to Detect Dangerous Cut-in Maneuvers. The Transportation Research Board (TRB) 95th Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  9. Mandalia, H. M. and Salvucci, M. D. D. (2005). Using support vector machines for lane-change detection. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 49, 22, 1965–1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mesures, B. I. D. P. E., Internationale, C. É. and Normalisation, O. I. D. (1995). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  11. Nishiwaki, Y., Miyajima, C., Kitaoka, N. and Takeda, K. (2012). A Stochastic Approach for Modeling Lane-Change Trajectories. Digital Signal Processing for In-Vehicle Systems and Safety. Springer. New York, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE, 772, 257–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schlechtriemen, J., Wedel, A., Hillenbrand, J., Breuel, G. and Kuhnert, K.-D. (2014). A lane change detection approach using feature ranking with maximized predictive power. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. Proc., Dearborn, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Streubel, T. and Hoffmann, K. H. (2014). Prediction of driver intended path at intersections. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. Proc., Dearborn, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Tang, B., Khokhar, S. and Gupta, R. (2015). Turn prediction at generalized intersections. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. (IV), Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
  16. White, G. H. (2008). Basics of estimating measurement uncertainty. The Clinical Biochemist Reviews 29, Supplement 1, S53.Google Scholar
  17. Woo, H., Ji, Y., Kono, H., Tamura, Y., Yamashita, A. and Asama, H. (2015). Detection method of lane change intentions in other drivers using hidden markov models. Int. Conf. Advanced Mechatronics: Toward Evolutionary Fusion of IT and Mechatronics, 253–254.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© KSAE 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Vehicle Control EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Automotive EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations