Advertisement

International Journal of Automotive Technology

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 949–957 | Cite as

Aerodynamic Design of a Solar Road Vehicle

  • Ljubomir Majdandžić
  • Dalibor Buljić
  • Andrija Buljac
  • Hrvoje KozmarEmail author
Article
  • 129 Downloads

Abstract

Solar road vehicles have very specific design requirements. This makes their aerodynamic characteristics quite different from classic sedan vehicles. In the present study, the computational model of a typical solar road vehicle was developed to investigate its aerodynamic forces and flow characteristics. Computations were performed assuming the steady viscous flow and using the Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes equations along with the k-ω turbulence model. The obtained results indicate some important findings that are commonly not present for classic sedan vehicles. In particular, a contribution of the viscous drag force to the overall drag force is considerably larger (41 %) than it is the case for the standard passenger road vehicles, where the form drag force dominates over the viscous drag force. Surface pressure distribution patterns indicate a favorable aerodynamic design of this vehicle. In particular, larger pressure coefficients on the top of the vehicle body as compared to the bottom surface contribute to increasing a downforce and thus the vehicle traction. The airfoil-shaped crosssection of the designed cockpit canopy has favorable properties with respect to reduction of the aerodynamic drag force.

Key Words

Solar electric vehicle Aerodynamic design and forces Computational model Reynolds-averaged Navier- Stokes equations k-ω turbulence model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amann, C. A. (1994). Private vehicles for personal transportation. Int. J. Vehicle Design 14, 5–6, 399−430.Google Scholar
  2. Bakker, A. (2006). Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics. Lecture 11–Boundary Layers and Separation.Google Scholar
  3. Barros, D., Borée, J., Noack, B. R., Spohn, A. and Ruiz, T. (2016). Bluff body drag manipulation using pulsed jets and Coanda effect. J. Fluid Mechanics, 805, 422–459.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birnie, D. P. (2016). Analysis of energy capture by vehicle solar roofs in conjunction with workplace plug-in charging. Solar Energy, 125, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buljac, A., Džijan, I., Korade, I., Krizmanić, S. and Kozmar, H. (2016). Automobile aerodynamics influenced by airfoil-shaped rear wing. Int. J. Automotive Technology 17, 3, 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cadot, O., Courbois, A., Ricot, D., Ruiz, T., Harambat, F. and Herbert, V. (2016). Characterisations of force and pressure fluctuations of real vehicles. Int. J. Engineering Systems Modelling and Simulation 8, 2, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doig, G. and Beves, C. (2014). Aerodynamic design and development of the Sunswift IV solar racing car. Int. J. Vehicle Design 66, 2, 144–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elofsson, P. and Bannister, M. (2002). Drag reduction mechanisms due to moving ground and wheel rotation in passenger cars. SAE Paper No. 2002–01-0531.Google Scholar
  9. Ferziger, J. H. and Perić, M. (2002). Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Spriger-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
  10. Gregory, N. and O’Reilly, C. L. (1970). Low-speed Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 0012 Aerofoil Section, Including the Effects of Upper-surface Roughness Simulating Hoar Frost. Research Council. London, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Huminic, A. and Huminic, G. (2017). Aerodynamic study of a generic car model with wheels and underbody diffuser. Int. J. Automotive Technology 18, 3, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kang, S. O., Jun, S. O., Park, H. I., Song, K. S., Kee, J. D., Kim, K. H. and Lee, D. H. (2012). Actively translating a rear diffuser device for the aerodynamic drag reduction of a passenger car. Int. J. Automotive Technology 13, 4, 583–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Katz, J. (1996). Race Car Aerodynamics. Bentley Publishers. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Khaled, M., El Hage, H., Harambat, F. and Peerhossaini, H. (2012). Some innovative concepts for car drag reduction: A parametric analysis of aerodynamic forces on a simplified body. J. Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 107–108, 36−47.Google Scholar
  15. McBeath, S. (2011). Competition Car Aerodynamics. Haynes Publishing. Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
  16. McNally, J., Fernandez, E., Robertson, G., Kumar, R., Taira, K., Alvi, F., Yamaguchi, Y. and Murayama, K. (2015). Drag reduction on a flat-back ground vehicle with active flow control. J. Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 145, 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Menter, F. R. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal 32, 8, 1598–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rao, G. S., Rao, G. K., Murthy, G. R. K. and Obulesh, Y. (2009). Power management policies and control of hybrid electric vehicle. Int. J. Renewable Energy Technology 1, 1, 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saber, A. Y. and Venayagamoorthy, G. K. (2011). Plug-in vehicles and renewable energy sources for cost and emission reductions. IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics 58, 4, 1229–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Salim, S. M. and Cheah, S. C. (2009). Wall y+ strategy for dealing with wall-bounded turbulent flows. Proc. Int. MultiConf. Engineerings and Computer Science, Hong Kong. Google Scholar
  21. Sharma, D., Gaur, P. and Mittal, A. P. (2013). Energy management system for a PV assisted conventional vehicle. Int. J. Energy Technology and Policy 9, 2, 144–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Song, K. S., Kang, S. O., Jun, S. O., Park, H. I., Kee, J. D., Kim, K. H. and Lee, D. H. (2012). Aerodynamic design optimization of rear body shapes of a sedan for drag reduction. Int. J. Automotive Technology 13, 6, 905–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taha, Z., Passarella, R., Sugiyono, Nasrudin, A. R., Jamali, M. S. and Aznijar, A. Y. (2011). CFD analysis for Merdeka 2 solar vehicle. Advanced Science Letters 4, 8–10, 2807−2811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vinnichenko, N. S., Uvarov, A. V., Znamenskaya, I. A., Herchang, A. Y. and Wang, T. (2014). Solar car aerodynamic design for optimal cooling and high efficiency. Solar Energy, 103, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. West, G. S. and Apelt, C. J. (1982). The effects of tunnel blockage and aspect ratio on the mean flow past a circular cylinder with Reynolds numbers between 104 and 105. J. Fluid Mechanics, 114, 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ljubomir Majdandžić
    • 1
  • Dalibor Buljić
    • 1
  • Andrija Buljac
    • 2
  • Hrvoje Kozmar
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringJosip Juraj Strossmayer University of OsijekOsijekCroatia
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval ArchitectureUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations