Advertisement

Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 264–273 | Cite as

The Nekton Assemblage of Salt Marsh Pools in a Southeastern United States Estuary

  • Marvin M. MaceIIIEmail author
  • Matthew E. Kimball
  • Eric R. Haffey
Article

Abstract

Marsh pools are present in estuaries throughout the world and provide valuable habitat for fishes and decapod crustaceans (i.e., nekton). The purpose of our study was to examine the species composition and temporal variation of the nekton assemblage within marsh pools of a southeastern US estuary. We conducted weekly sampling of five marsh pools in the North Inlet estuary, SC from May to November 2016. Temporal variation in the nekton assemblage appeared to be related to the life history of individual species, tidal connectivity of pools with adjacent habitats, and environmental conditions within pools. Most transient species, which migrate into the North Inlet estuary as larvae or juveniles, were present primarily in early summer and late fall. Many transient species were absent or occurred in low abundance during July and August when water temperature was highest, salinity most variable, and tidal connectivity with adjacent habitats was lowest. In contrast, most resident species, which can complete their entire life cycle within the North Inlet estuary, were present and relatively abundant throughout the study as juveniles and adults. Based on the limited studies available, species richness and the ratio of transient to resident species in marsh pools at low latitudes (e.g., southeastern US) are higher compared to marsh pools at high latitudes (e.g., east coast of Canada). A more comprehensive understanding of the role of marsh pools in the life history of nekton would be useful for conserving, managing, and restoring salt marshes and the species found in these environments.

Keywords

Estuary Marsh pools Nekton Resident Salt marsh Transient 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Adams and J. Wilson from the Bonefish & Tarpon Trust for their suggestions and guidance with the development and execution of this project. We would also like to thank faculty, staff, and students from the USC Baruch Marine Field Laboratory (D. Allen, S. Forehand, M. Kennedy, P. Kenny, T. Thomas), Cornell College Rogers Fellowship in Environmental Studies program (R. Bulger, J. Dean, J. Tesensky), and Wofford College (K. Dickson, D. Kusher, K. Moorhouse) for their assistance with this study. The suggestions of L. Rozas, the associate editor, and two anonymous reviewers improved the manuscript. This research was conducted in accordance with the guidelines set forth in University of South Carolina IACUC Animal Care and Use Protocols #2154-100810-040814, #2264-101032-080315, and #2273-101047-093015.

Funding Information

Funding for this research was provided by the Bonefish & Tarpon Trust.

References

  1. Able, K.W., K.J. Smith, and S.M. Hagan. 2005. Fish composition and abundance in New Jersey salt marsh pools: sampling technique effects. Northeastern Naturalist 12 (4): 485–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Able, K.W., D.N. Vivian, G. Petruzzelli, and S.M. Hagan. 2012. Connectivity among salt marsh subhabitats: residency and movements of the mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus). Estuaries and Coasts 35 (3): 743–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adamowicz, S.C., and C.T. Roman. 2005. New England salt marsh pools: a quantitative analysis of geomorphic and geographic features. Wetlands 25 (2): 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, D.M., W.B. Allen, R.F. Feller, and J.S. Plunkett, eds. 2014. Site profile of the North Inlet-Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, 432 pp. Georgetown, SC: North Inlet-Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve.Google Scholar
  5. Barnby, M.A., J.N. Collins, and V.H. Resh. 1985. Aquatic macroinvertebrate communities of natural and ditched potholes in a San Francisco Bay salt marsh. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 20 (3): 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bleakney, J.S., and K.B. Meyer. 1979. Observations on saltmarsh pools, Minas Basin, Nova Scotia 1965–1977. Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science 29: 353–371.Google Scholar
  7. Chidester, F.E. 1920. The behavior of Fundulus heteroclitus on the salt marshes of New Jersey. The American Naturalist 54 (635): 551–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahlberg, M.D. 1972. An ecological study of Georgia coastal fishes. Fishery Bulletin 70: 323–353.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, B., R. Johnston, R. Baker, and M. Sheaves. 2012. Fish utilisation of wetland nurseries with complex hydrological connectivity. PLoS One 7 (11): e49107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, B., C. Mattone, and M. Sheaves. 2014a. Bottom-up control regulates patterns of fish connectivity and assemblage structure in coastal wetlands. Marine Ecology Progress Series 500: 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, B., R. Baker, and M. Sheaves. 2014b. Seascape and metacommunity processes regulate fish assemblage structure in coastal wetlands. Marine Ecology Progress Series 500: 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erwin, R.M., D.R. Cahoon, D.J. Prosser, G.M. Sanders, and P. Hensel. 2006. Surface elevation dynamics in vegetated Spartina marshes versus unvegetated tidal ponds along the Mid-Atlantic coast, USA, with implications to waterbirds. Estuaries and Coasts 29 (1): 96–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frid, C.L.J. 1988. The marine fauna of the north Norfolk salt marshes, and their ecology. Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists’ Society 28: 46–50.Google Scholar
  14. Frid, C.L.J., and R. James. 1989. The marine invertebrate fauna of a British coastal salt marsh. Holarctic Ecology 12: 9–15.Google Scholar
  15. Halpin, P.M. 2000. Habitat use by an intertidal salt-marsh fish: trade-offs between predation and growth. Marine Ecology Progress Series 198: 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hampel, H., A. Cattrijsse, and J. Mees. 2004. Changes in marsh nekton communities along the salinity gradient of the Schelde river, Belgium and The Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 515 (1-3): 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrington, R.W., Jr., and E.S. Harrington. 1961. Food selection among fishes invading a high subtropical salt marsh: from onset of flooding through the progress of a mosquito brood. Ecology 42 (4): 646–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harshberger, J.W. 1916. The origin and vegetation of salt marsh pools. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 55: 481–484.Google Scholar
  19. Hunter, K.L., M.G. Fox, and K.W. Able. 2007. Habitat influences on reproductive allocation and growth of the mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) in a coastal salt marsh. Marine Biology 151 (2): 617–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunter, K.L., M.G. Fox, and K.W. Able. 2009. Influence of flood frequency, temperature and population density on migration of Fundulus heteroclitus in semi-isolated marsh pond habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 391: 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ingólfsson, A. 1994. Species assemblages in saltmarsh ponds in western Iceland in relation to environmental variables. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 38 (3): 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kilby, J.D. 1955. The fishes of two Gulf coastal marsh areas of Florida. Tulane Studies in Zoology 2: 175–247.Google Scholar
  23. Kneib, R.T. 1978. Habitat, diet, reproduction and growth of the spotfin killifish, Fundulus luciae, from a North Carolina salt marsh. Copeia 1: 164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kneib, R.T. 1982. The effects of predation by wading birds (Ardeidae) and blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) on the population size structure of the common mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 14 (2): 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kneib, R.T. 1997. Early life stages of resident nekton in intertidal marshes. Estuaries 20 (1): 214–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Layman, C.A., D.E. Smith, and J.D. Herod. 2000. Seasonally varying importance of abiotic and biotic factors in marsh-pond fish communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series 207: 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mace, M.M., III, E.R. Haffey, and M.E. Kimball. 2017. Low-temperature tolerance of juvenile tarpon Megalops atlanticus. Environmental Biology of Fishes 100 (8): 913–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacKenzie, R.A., and M. Dionne. 2008. Habitat heterogeneity: importance of salt marsh pools and high marsh surfaces to fish production in two Gulf of Maine salt marshes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 368: 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Minello, T.J., K.W. Able, M.P. Weinstein, and C.G. Hays. 2003. Salt marshes as nurseries for nekton: testing hypotheses on density, growth and survival through meta-analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 246: 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nicol, E.A.T. 1935. The ecology of a salt-marsh. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 20 (2): 203–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Noël, P.E., and G.L. Chmura. 2011. Spatial and environmental variability of pools on a natural and a recovering salt marsh in the Bay of Fundy. Journal of Coastal Research 27: 847–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nordlie, F.G. 2006. Physicochemical environments and tolerances of cyprinodontoid fishes found in estuaries and salt marshes of eastern North America. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 16 (1): 51–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Poulin, R., and G.J. FitzGerald. 1989. Early life histories of three sympatric sticklebacks in a salt-marsh. Journal of Fish Biology 34 (2): 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raposa, K.B. 2003. Overwintering habitat selection by the mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus, in a Cape Cod (USA) salt marsh. Wetlands Ecology and Management 11 (3): 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raposa, K.B., and C.T. Roman. 2001. Seasonal habitat-use patterns of nekton in a tide-restricted and unrestricted New England salt marsh. Wetlands 21 (4): 451–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rickards, W.L. 1966. A study of the ecology of first-year tarpon, Megalops atlantica Valenciennes, in a Georgia salt-marsh, with laboratory studies of growth rates and ecological growth efficiencies, 67 pp. Athens, GA: M.S. Thesis. University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  37. Rickards, W.L. 1968. Ecology and growth of juvenile tarpon, Megalops atlanticus, in a Georgia salt marsh. Bulletin of Marine Science 18: 220–239.Google Scholar
  38. Roman, C.T., K.B. Raposa, S.C. Adamowicz, M.-J. James-Pirri, and J.G. Catena. 2002. Quantifying vegetation and nekton response to tidal restoration of a New England salt marsh. Restoration Ecology 10 (3): 450–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rowe, C.L., and W.A. Dunson. 1995. Individual and interactive effects of salinity and initial fish density on a salt marsh assemblage. Marine Ecology Progress Series 128: 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rozas, L.P. 1995. Hydroperiod and its influence on nekton use of the salt marsh: a pulsing ecosystem. Estuaries 18 (4): 579–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sampaio, H.A., and J.M. Martinelli-Lemos. 2014. Use of intertidal areas by shrimps (Decapoda) in a Brazilian Amazon estuary. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences 86 (1): 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, K.J., and K.W. Able. 1994. Salt-marsh tide pools as winter refuges for the mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus, in New Jersey. Estuaries 17 (1): 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, K.J., and K.W. Able. 2003. Dissolved oxygen dynamics in salt marsh pools and its potential impacts on fish assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 258: 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Subrahmanyam, C.B., and C.L. Coultas. 1980. Studies on the animal communities in two North Florida salt marshes. Part III. Seasonal fluctuations of fish and macroinvertebrates. Bulletin of Marine Science 30: 790–818.Google Scholar
  45. Talbot, C.W., and K.W. Able. 1984. Composition and distribution of larval fishes in New Jersey high marshes. Estuaries 7 (4): 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Talbot, C.W., K.W. Able, and J.K. Shisler. 1986. Fish species composition in New Jersey salt marshes: effects of marsh alterations for mosquito control. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 115 (2): 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Teal, J.M. 1958. Distribution of fiddler crabs in Georgia salt marshes. Ecology 39 (2): 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Verhoeven, J.T.A., and W. van Vierssen. 1978. Distribution and structure of communities dominated by Ruppia, Zostera and Potamogeton species in the inland waters of ‘De Bol’, Texel, The Netherlands. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 6 (4): 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vincent, R.E., M. Dionne, D.M. Burdick, and E.A. Hobbie. 2015. Fish productivity and trophic transfer in created and naturally occurring salt marsh habitat. Estuaries and Coasts 38 (4): 1233–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walsh, G., and G.J. FitzGerald. 1984. Resource utilization and coexistence of three species of sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae) in tidal salt-marsh pools. Journal of Fish Biology 25 (4): 405–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ward, G., and G.J. FitzGerald. 1983. Fish predation on the macrobenthos of tidal salt marsh pools. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61 (6): 1358–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Whoriskey, F.G., and G.J. FitzGerald. 1989. Breeding-season habitat use by sticklebacks (Pisces: Gasterosteidae) at Isle Verte, Quebec. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67 (9): 2126–2130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wolf, E.G., B. Morson, and K.W. Fucik. 1983. Preliminary studies of food habits of juvenile fish, China Poot Marsh and Potter Marsh, Alaska, 1978. Estuaries 6 (2): 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Worgan, J.P., and G.J. FitzGerald. 1981a. Diel activity and diet of three sympatric sticklebacks in tidal salt marsh pools. Canadian Journal of Zoology 59 (12): 2375–2379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Worgan, J.P., and G.J. FitzGerald. 1981b. Habitat segregation in a salt marsh among adult sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 6 (1): 105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marvin M. MaceIII
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthew E. Kimball
    • 1
  • Eric R. Haffey
    • 1
  1. 1.Baruch Marine Field LaboratoryUniversity of South CarolinaGeorgetownUSA

Personalised recommendations