Differential Mortality of North Atlantic Bivalve Molluscs During Harmful Algal Blooms Caused by the Dinoflagellate, Cochlodinium (a.k.a. Margalefidinium) polykrikoides
Blooms of the dinoflagellate, Cochlodinium (a.k.a.Margalefidinium) polykrikoides, have had deleterious effects on marine life across the Northern Hemisphere and, since the early 1990s, have become more frequent and widespread. While the toxic effects of C. polykrikoides have been well-described for finfish, the effects on bivalve molluscs are poorly understood, particularly in ecosystem and aquaculture settings. The purpose of this study was to characterize the comparative effects of C. polykrikoides blooms on North Atlantic bivalves and to identify the environmental factors that influence its toxic effects. The growth and survival of two age-classes (first- and second-year) of the northern quahog (Mercenaria mercenaria), the bay scallop (Argopecten irradians), and the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) were quantified in surface deployments and at depth during annual bloom events in multiple locations across eastern Long Island (NY, USA), capturing a natural gradient in C. polykrikoides. In two consecutive years, scallops deployed within surface locations experienced significant mortality (75–100%) during short-term (1–2 weeks) but intense (> 1.5 × 104 cells mL−1) C. polykrikoides blooms. Conversely, scallops deployed at depth and clams and oysters deployed at either the surface or at depth were more resistant to blooms. First-year oysters and scallops that survived blooms displayed significant reductions in growth rates, while clams and older scallops and oysters did not. Results suggest that blooms of C. polykrikoides pose significant age- and species-specific threats to native and cultured bivalve shellfish and that shellfish deployed in surface waters are at greater risk during blooms than those deployed at depth.
KeywordsMargalefidinium polykrikoides Cochlodinium polykrikoides Harmful algae Mercenaria mercenaria Argopecten irradians Crassostrea virginica
Harmful algal blooms (HAB) pose a significant and growing threat to aquaculture (Shumway 1990; Landsberg 2010), and climate change is predicted to increase the distribution and severity of several HAB (Hallegraeff 2010; Glibert et al. 2014; Gobler et al. 2017). At bloom-exposed aquaculture locations, HAB can cause widespread (Gobler et al. 2017) mortality among cultured organisms and sub-lethal impacts (i.e., reduced growth, physical damage, etc.; Shumway 1990; Landsberg 2010; Matsuyama and Shumway, 2009; Burkholder and Shumway 2011) can limit marketability of products (Shumway 1990; Anderson et al. 2000). Certain HAB are capable of producing potent neurotoxic or gastrointestinal biotoxins that can (bio)accumulate in the tissues of exposed shellfish, and when consumed by humans can result in severe intoxication (Shumway 1990; Hégaret et al. 2009) making shellfish aquaculture particularly vulnerable to these events. As aquaculture industries continue to expand and concurrent changes in climate stimulate the growth and proliferation of certain HAB (Gobler et al. 2017), identifying potential risks (i.e., vulnerable species) and mitigation strategies may limit losses.
Identified in 1895 (Schütt 1895), blooms of dinoflagellates within the genus Cochlodinium (a.k.aMargalefidinium) have been reported along North American and East Asian coastlines for decades (Kudela and Gobler 2012). Since the 1990s, however, reports have become more commonplace with blooms now occurring in areas previously void of these HAB (Kim et al. 1999; Gobler et al. 2008; Kudela et al. 2008; Kudela and Gobler 2012). Dense aggregations of C. polykrikoides also known as, ‘rust tides,’ can be associated with widespread marine animal mortality (Kim et al. 1999; Gobler et al. 2008; Mulholland et al. 2009; Richlen et al. 2010). The toxic effects of C. polykrikoides on finfish in both field and laboratory settings have been well-described (Kim et al. 1999, 2000; Tang and Gobler 2009a) being highly lethal (Gobler et al. 2008; Tang and Gobler 2009a), manifested acutely (Kim et al. 1999; Gobler et al. 2008), and causing significant economic damage (Kim 1997; Kim et al. 1999). Shellfish are more resistant than fish to C. polykrikoides, but are nonetheless susceptible (Ho and Zubkoff 1979; Gobler et al. 2008; Tang and Gobler 2009b). While the effects of C. polykrikoides on bivalve shellfish have been described (Ho and Zubkoff 1979; Gobler et al. 2008; Tang and Gobler 2009b), there is little comparative information (i.e., species- and size-specific) and few reports describing lethal or sub-lethal effects in ecosystem settings.
Blooms of C. polykrikoides are now annual occurrences in many temperate zones of the Northern Hemisphere (Gobler et al. 2008; Kudela et al. 2008; Kudela and Gobler 2012) and commonly occur in areas with widespread aquaculture within the northwest Atlantic (Gobler et al. 2008; Mulholland et al. 2009; Li et al. 2012) and Pacific (Kim et al. 1999, 2000). To date, approximately 50% of the global seafood production is aquaculture-sourced, with more than half of that production being attributed to shellfish (NMFS 2015; FAO 2016a). Within C. polykrikoides—afflicted regions of the northeastern US, bivalve shellfish represent a large and increasing portion of fisheries landings (Shumway et al. 2003; Ekstrom et al. 2015; NMFS 2015) and are a key economic resource in some coastal communities (Neiland et al. 1991; Shumway et al. 2003; Grabowski et al. 2012). In addition to their economic value, bivalve shellfish provide essential ecosystem services through the control of eutrophication (Officer et al. 1982; Dame 1996; Newell 2004; Burkholder and Shumway 2011), stabilization of coastlines (Coen et al. 2007; Grabowski and Peterson 2007), establishment of critical habitat (Tolley and Volety 2005; Coen et al. 2007; Abeels et al. 2012), and removal of particulates from the water column (Newell 2004; Wall et al. 2011).
Daily vertical movement of C. polykrikoides has been documented in Korean coastal waters (Park et al. 2001; Kim et al. 2010), with high concentrations reported at the surface during daylight hours and greater abundances at depth (< 20 m) during the night. Diel vertical migration is common in many dinoflagellate species, enabling cells to exploit nutrient-rich bottom waters in areas where surface-nutrients are depleted (Smayda and Reynolds 2003; Doblin et al. 2006). The ability of C. polykrikoides to form chains of two or more cells enhances motility (Fraga et al. 1989; Smayda and Reynolds 2003), helps to maintain surface positions in warm, low-viscosity waters (Fraga et al. 1989), and deters grazers (Jiang et al. 2009, 2010). Fish kills associated with C. polykrikoides along the east coast of Korea have been reported at depth, at night, presumably as C. polykrikoides cells migrate deeper into the water column (Kim et al. 2010). While diel movements of C. polykrikoides have been partly characterized in Asia, they have never been described along the east coast of the USA. Nonetheless, movements are likely dependent upon the hydrographic conditions in bloom-exposed areas and/or strain-specific (Kudela et al. 2008) with the ribotype (e.g., East Asian) of C. polykrikoides forming blooms in Korea being distinct from the American/Malaysian ribotype (Iwataki et al. 2008). Regardless, vertical movement within the water column could influence impacts of C. polykrikoides on aquaculture in areas where blooms are present.
The purpose of this study was to identify species-, age-, and position-specific effects of C. polykrikoides on the growth and survival of three commercially and ecologically significant bivalve shellfish, the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica), the northern quahog (= hard clam; Mercenaria mercenaria), and the bay scallop (Argopecten irradians). Two age-classes of each species (first- and second-year) were deployed at bloom-prone locations in Long Island (NY, USA) estuaries at surface and bottom positions prior to and during annual bloom events in 2014 and 2015. Survival and growth of shellfish were quantified weekly as blooms initiated, peaked, and waned. In addition to quantifying growth and survival of bivalves, surface and bottom chlorophyll a, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and C. polykrikoides densities were measured at each site.
Materials and Methods
Shellfish Collection and Maintenance
To assess the age- and species-specific effects of C. polykrikoides exposure at varying vertical positions within the water column, multiple species of shellfish of different age classes (first- and second-year; all diploid) were deployed at multiple locations within Shinnecock and Peconic Bays during C. polykrikoides bloom events on Long Island (NY, USA). In 2014, responses among two size-classes of each shellfish species (C. virginica, M. mercenaria, and A. irradians) were examined. First-year shellfish (all species) were obtained from the East Hampton Town Shellfish Hatchery (EHTSH; Montauk, NY, USA). Second-year clams and oysters were obtained from EHTSH and second-year size-class bay scallops were collected from eastern Shinnecock Bay (40.8647° N, 72.4913° W). In 2015, juvenile scallops (first-year only) were obtained from the Cornell University Cooperative Extension (Southold, NY). Prior to deployments, all shellfish were maintained in flow-through sea tables (~23 °C) for ~2 weeks at the Stony Brook—Southampton Marine Science Center which circulates water from eastern Shinnecock Bay.
An additional series of experiments was conducted during the summer of 2015 with first-year scallops (~15 mm) only. Scallops, obtained from the Cornell University Cooperative Extension Marine Program (Southold, NY), were deployed within OFP and at Tiana Beach (TB; 40.8289° N, 72.5305° W; Fig. 1) within western Shinnecock Bay, a site historically void of C. polykrikoides. Shellfish were deployed in grow-out rafts (15 mm mesh size; n = 3 rafts site−1 position−1; n = 100 scallops raft−1; see above for description) at surface and at depth prior to the occurrence of C. polykrikoides blooms (e.g., 2 Sept 2015). Shellfish were monitored for survival and temperature and DO monitored as described for 2014. Experiments lasted ~1 week due to a mass mortality event associated with a C. polykrikoides bloom and thus growth was not quantified.
Assessment of Diel Vertical Migration
Multiple diurnal water collections were conducted over 72 h within OFP during the peak of the 2014 bloom (9–12 Sept 2014) to identify spatial and temporal patterns of cell densities among surface and bottom positions. At 2- and 3-h intervals, water samples were collected from the surface and bottom using a horizontal Van Dorn water sampler. Samples were preserved in Lugol’s iodine and cell densities determined using a compound light microscope.
All statistical analyses were conducted using R® (www.r-project.org,Version 3.4.4) software. To compare differences in the growth and survival of shellfish, a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for each age-class with ‘species,’ ‘site,’ and ‘position’ included as the main, fixed effects. Surface and bottom bags, within each site, were maintained independent from one another and thus it was assumed that effects at one position did not carry-over to concurrently deployed shellfish at the same position or to individuals at other positions. Maximum cell densities between sites and positions were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA. All data was verified to conform to a normal distribution with equal variance using Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodness-of-Fit and Levene’s (http://cran.r-project/package=car) tests respectively. When significant differences were detected, a Tukey’s honest significant difference (Tukey HSD) test was performed to identify the source of variance and to adjust p values for multiple comparisons. Differences in levels of environmental variables (e.g., mean temperature, dissolved oxygen, and chlorophyll a) between sites and among surface and bottom positions within each site during deployments were analyzed using a linear mixed effect model (LME; https://cran.r-project.org/package=nlme) with ‘site’ and ‘position’ included as fixed effects in addition to a random effect of ‘time’ to account for non-independence (i.e., repeated measures) of measurements over time. Assumptions of a normal distribution were confirmed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov’s test. Unequal variances of environmental parameters between sites and among position within sites were observed and as such, site- and position-specific variances were included in model parameters. Pairwise comparisons of environmental conditions within and between shellfish deployment sites were analyzed using least-square means (http://cran.r-project.org/packag=lsmean) and p values adjusted as per Tukey’s method. All results were deemed significant at α ≤ 0.05.
Progression of Blooms During 2014 and 2015
Shellfish Survival—Summer 2014
Mean (± S.D) temperature (°C), dissolved oxygen (DO; mg L−1), chlorophyll a (5 μm; μg L−1), and peak C. polykrikoides cell densities (cells mL−1) at deployments sites
Chlorophyll a 5 μm
Peak cell densities
22.71 ± 2.33
7.37 ± 2.08
26.10 ± 14.52
34,950 ± 2404
22.99 ± 2.26
5.20 ± 2.17
19.26 ± 6.06
4810 ± 240
22.63 ± 2.27
7.04 ± 1.79
28.31 ± 32.98
2215 ± 120
22.50 ± 2.28
5.80 ± 1.88
13.16 ± 13.82
267 ± 88
22.64 ± 1.95
8.03 ± 1.03
3.14 ± 2.37
18 ± 3
22.53 ± 1.85
7.36 ± 1.45
4.11 ± 0.48
44 ± 6
Shellfish Survival—Summer 2015
For the 2015 experiment, surface mortality was observed again (Fig. 5). When the C. polykrikoides bloom emerged in OFP, significant (p < 0.05; two-way ANOVA; Fig. 5) scallop mortality followed at surface positions only, with 100% of scallops perishing. In contrast, scallops deployed at depth exhibited only 3% mortality. There was no effect of position or site on the survival of scallops deployed at TB where final survival was 97 and 93% at surface and bottom positions, respectively (p > 0.05; two-way ANOVA; Fig. 5). Growth rates for 2015 deployments were not quantified since mortality was 100% in surface positions after 1 week.
Shellfish Growth—First-Year—Summer 2014
Shellfish Growth—Second-Year—Summer 2014
For second-year shellfish, again, species-specific differences (p < 0.001; three-way ANOVA; see Suppl. Table 4 for all pairwise comparisons) were observed with hard clams and bay scallops, regardless of position and site, growing slower than oysters (Fig. 7d–f). Significant interactive effects between site and position (p < 0.01; three-way ANOVA) were observed whereby hard clams grown among bottom positions of NS grew significantly (p = 0.0342; Tukey HSD), albeit slightly (e.g., 0.053 mm day−1), slower than those cultivated among bottom positions of OFP (Fig. 7d). For second-year oysters, growth rates among the surface of OFP were significantly (all p < 0.01; Tukey HSD) reduced relative to those cultivated at the surface of NS and among bottom positions of OFP, NS, and EC (Fig. 7e). Similarly, oysters among surface positions of EC grew slower relative to oysters among bottom positions of OFP and NS (Fig. 7e). There were no differences observed between the surviving scallops among any other sites or position within any site (Fig. 7f); however, survival of bay scallops was low (both age-classes, see “Shellfish Survival 2014—Summer 2014” section) at OFP; hence mean growth rates for this site were based upon the final lengths of the few surviving individuals within each raft.
Environmental Conditions During Bloom Events
Diel Vertical Migration—2014
Blooms of C. polykrikoides have long been known to be lethal to marine life, primarily cultured fish (Kim et al. 1999, 2000; Kudela and Gobler 2012). Results of this study demonstrate that blooms of C. polykrikoides, in addition to laboratory-based settings (Gobler et al. 2008; Tang and Gobler 2009a, 2009b), are lethal to shellfish in natural settings, posing a threat to multiple species and age-classes of bivalve molluscs. Differences in temperature were found to vary within and between deployment locations, but did not correspond directly with reduced survival or growth of shellfish. Effects were species-specific resulting in significantly reduced survival of bay scallops as well as the reduced growth of first-year scallops and oysters at bloom-prone sites. Scallop mortality, where present, was restricted to surface positions corresponding with maximum C. polykrikoides cell densities (Figs. 2a, b, 5, and 6e, f). Among commercially and ecologically significant North Atlantic bivalve shellfish, bay scallops appear to be at greater risk than oysters which appear more sensitive to blooms than clams and shellfish cultured at surface locations appear more vulnerable than those deployed at depth during C. polykrikoides blooms.
Implications for Shellfish Aquaculture
Aquaculture is a rapidly growing industry (FAO 2008, 2016b). Greater than half of the global seafood production now originates from cultured sources (FAO 2016b, a), supporting a growing demand for seafood that is an important source of protein and nutrition in many coastal communities (Mos et al. 2004; Hibbeln et al. 2007; Smith et al. 2010). Shellfish aquaculture in particular is growing in popularity due to its associated environmental benefits and its recognition as a ‘sustainable’ practice (Shumway et al. 2003; Burkholder and Shumway 2011). Results from this study, as well as others (see Ho and Zubkoff 1979; Gobler et al. 2008; Mulholland et al. 2009; Tang and Gobler 2009a, 2009b; Li et al. 2012), suggest that C. polykrikoides blooms represent a threat to shellfish aquaculture and that the impacts are species-specific.
Beyond mortality, oysters and scallops displayed significant reductions in growth at sites where C. polykrikoides was present. Specifically, first-year oysters at surface positions displayed slower growth at bloom prone sites (OFP and EC) relative to the control location (NS), a finding consistent with prior studies of bivalves and C. polykrikoides in North America (Gobler et al. 2008; Li et al. 2012). Further reductions in first-year oysters were observed among bottom-deployed first-year oysters deployed at OFP and EC, possibly a result of low DO. Levels of DO at both OFP and EC were significantly lower than the control site (NS) with both sites exhibiting extended excursions below 5 mg L−1 (Fig. 9), levels that are known to slow the growth of shellfish (Vaquer-Sunyer and Duarte 2008; Levin et al. 2009; Gobler et al. 2014; Clark and Gobler 2016). Lower DO, however, at locations where elevated C. polykrikoides densities were observed may be linked, indirectly, to the presence of blooms (Bauman et al. 2010; Morse et al. 2011). For example, blooms occurring at the surface may limit light levels reaching the bottom and provide large quantities of organic matter, a scenario that would favor enhanced rates of microbial respiration that reduce DO levels and slow shellfish growth (Kim et al. 2010; Bauman et al. 2010; Morse et al. 2011). The concurrent effects of HAB and other environmental stressors have been poorly studied, but may yield interactions that inhibit the performance of shellfish. For example, Talmage and Gobler (2012) reported that bay scallop larvae concurrently exposed to the HAB-forming pelagophyte Aureococcus anophagefferens and low pH displayed synergistically low survival, i.e., mortality was greater than would have been predicted based upon individual exposures to each stressor. Hence, aquaculture locales where multiple additional stressors are present may be highly vulnerable to HAB.
Results presented here have implications regarding the species-specific management of commercially produced shellfish. Bay scallops and first-year oysters that are negatively affected by dense C. polykrikoides blooms may benefit from relocation to grow-out sites or facilities where blooms are less likely to occur or are less intense. Clams (both year-classes) and second-year oysters were resistant to C. polykrikoides and thus may withstand moderate bloom events at grow-out sites and culture facilities. At grow-out sites where relocation of shellfish is not feasible, shellfish deployed at depth may be exposed to lower densities of C. polykrikoides than shellfish deployed at the surface and thus would be less apt to suffer mortality due to blooms, but may experience slowed growth at locations prone to low levels of dissolved oxygen.
Recent investigations have demonstrated that increases in sea surface temperatures, since the early 1980s, have contributed to increased growth and abundance of several HAB in areas where aquaculture is prominent (i.e., northwest Atlantic; Gobler et al. 2017). Additionally, warming can stimulate C. polykrikoides growth (Jeong et al. 2004; Lee and Lee 2006; Griffith and Gobler 2016) contributing to an increase in bloom intensities. Recently, such warming along the northeastern US has expanded the realized niche of C. polykrikoides (Griffith et al., in prep) with blooms now occurring annually in several locations including Chesapeake Bay (multiple tributaries; Marshall et al. 2006; Mulholland et al. 2009), Long Island (NY; Gobler et al. 2008, 2012), Rhode Island (Narragansett Bay; Hargraves and Maranda 2002), and Massachusetts (Buzzards Bay and Cap Cod; Kudela and Gobler 2012; Rheuban et al. 2016). Where present, blooms have been attributed to marine animal die-offs (Gobler et al. 2008; Mulholland et al. 2009; Morse et al. 2011) and in terms of shellfish mortality, there are reports of widespread mortality among shellfish populations following blooms of Cochlodinium (Curtiss et al. 2008; Gobler et al. 2008). Hence, as climate changes continue to expand within the Northern Hemisphere, the subsequent risk posed by these blooms will increase.
Species-Specific Effects of Exposure
The extreme sensitivity of bay scallops to C. polykrikoides is consistent with prior studies involving environmental stressors and these bivalves. Bay scallops are generally more sensitive to elevated temperatures (Tettelbach and Rhodes 1981; Brun et al. 2008; Talmage and Gobler 2011), acidification (Talmage and Gobler 2009), low dissolved oxygen (Bricelj et al. 1987; Chun-de and Fu-sui 1995; Clark and Gobler 2016), and exposure to other harmful algal species (Leverone et al. 2006, 2007) than other bivalves. Bay scallops rely upon carbohydrate reserves within adductor muscle tissue during periods of reduced food supplies (Barber and Blake 1981, 1983) and have a lower capacity for energy storage than other bivalves (Epp et al. 1988) making them more sensitive to stressors as food quality diminishes. Within the northwest Atlantic, bay scallop fisheries have been greatly diminished in recent decades due to over harvesting (Barber and Davis 1997; Oreska et al. 2017), habitat loss (Bowen and Valiela 2001; Serveiss et al. 2004; Orth et al. 2006), and recurrent harmful algal blooms (Cosper et al. 1987; Summerson and Peterson 1990). While some bay scallop restoration efforts have exhibited some success (Tettelbach et al. 2013), the current results indicate the annual recurrence of C. polykrikoides blooms may make restoration of bay scallops in bloom-exposed areas along the northeast US a significant challenge.
While the impacts of C. polykrikoides on oysters in the current study (slowed growth) were less severe than those exhibited by bay scallops (mortality), previous investigations from both the field and laboratory have described lethal effects of C. polykrikoides for oysters. Gobler et al. (2008) observed increased mortality among juvenile oysters and scallops following prolonged (9-day) laboratory exposures to bloom water. Similarly, Li et al. (2012) noted decreases in feeding activity, slow/no growth, and reduced survival of juvenile oysters following a prolonged (> 1 month) bloom of C. polykrikoides at a bloom-exposed oyster nursery. Differences between the sensitivities of oysters reported here and elsewhere may be due to the duration of bloom exposure. In the current study, oysters were exposed to short-term (< 9 days) but intense blooms (>30,000 cells mL−1), whereas reports of oyster mortality reported elsewhere (Gobler et al. 2008; Li et al. 2012) followed a more prolonged exposure to bloom conditions (≥ 9 days). To date, no study, including the present one, has reported on the harmful effects of C. polykrikoides for juvenile hard clams. Collectively, results presented here and elsewhere suggest that oysters and scallops are more vulnerable to C. polykrikoides blooms than clams and that the bay scallops are at greater risk than oysters.
Diel Vertical Migration
Previous investigations with East Asian ribotypes of C. polykrikoides from the field have indicated this alga undergoes diel movement throughout the water column over a 24-h period with greater cell densities quantified at the surface during daylight hours and dense subsurface maximums (e.g., 5–15 m) occurring at night (Park et al. 2001; Kim et al. 2010). In the current study, vertical movement was observed, but surface cell densities were consistently higher than bottom cell densities where levels were often an order of magnitude or more lower than surface concentrations. Differences in the magnitude of diel movements between this current study and observations elsewhere may be due to strain-specific variability or differences in hydrographic conditions among the study sites. In shallow well-mixed bays, cells may be more likely to aggregate at the surface during the daytime and simply disperse during the night or migrate onto or in sediments. Sites for the current study were shallower (~2 m) than those included in prior investigations (Park et al. 2001; Kim et al. 2010), and were in semi-enclosed bays rather than open seas. Nutrient levels, among shallow, tidally mixed, embayments studied here are similar at surface and at depth (Suffolk County Department of Health Services, suffolkcountyny.gov, 1976–2016) which may diminish diel movement of phytoplankton (Doblin et al. 2006) as vertical movement may not offer nutritional advantages. In larger, deeper, embayments where stratification of the water column is more pronounced, complete vertical migration of C. polykrikoides cells may be more pronounced.
Environmental Factors Influencing Toxicity
Environmental factors that influence the lethality of C. polykrikoides have yet to be fully investigated. For example, the impacts of irradiance on toxicity are currently unknown. While some controversy regarding the toxic mechanism of this HAB remains, the majority of evidence suggests that the toxic effects are, at least in part, related to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS; Kim et al. 1999; Tang and Gobler 2009a; Griffith and Gobler 2016). Production of ROS, a by-product of photosynthetic processes (Yu 1994; Wise 1995), would likely be greater during periods of adequate irradiance (i.e., surface positions during the daytime) and minimized during periods of low light (i.e., night or at depth). In addition to light effects, the effects of carbon dioxide (pCO2) on the growth and toxicity of C. polykrikoides have yet to be studied. In many temperate, net-heterotrophic estuaries, microbial respiration in bottom waters at night can elevate pCO2 levels (Wallace et al. 2014; Baumann et al. 2015). Such conditions may down-regulate photosynthetic machinery within phytoplankton and reduce ROS production (Sobrino et al. 2014), a phenomenon that may also diminish the toxicity of C. polykrikoides. Finally, while warmer temperatures are known to render C. polykrikoides less toxic (Griffith and Gobler 2016), there were no significant differences among surface temperatures during this study.
Blooms of the dinoflagellate C. polykrikoides pose a significant and growing threat to native and commercially produced shellfish within temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere. During field experiments with three commercially and ecologically significant bivalves, species-specific reductions in growth and survival were observed. While hard clams were resistant to blooms, first-year oysters and scallops that survived blooms displayed significant reductions in growth and among the species deployed, only first- and second-year bay scallops exhibited significant declines in survivorship during blooms. Lethal effects, where observed, coincided with maximum C. polykrikoides cell densities and were restricted to surface positions only. Findings suggest that current restoration efforts and aquaculture involving bay scallops are vulnerable to recurring C. polykrikoides blooms and that risks posed to aquaculture may be greatest among surface-deployed shellfish where cell densities are likely to be greatest.
- Bowen, J.L., and I. Valiela. 2001. The ecological effects of urbanization of coastal watersheds: historical increases in nitrogen loads and eutrophication of Waquoit Bay estuaries. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 1489–1500. https://doi.org/10.1139/f01-094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brun, N.T., V.M. Bricelj, T.H. MacRae, and N.W. Ross. 2008. Heat shock protein responses in thermally stressed bay scallops, Argopecten irradians, and sea scallops, Placopecten magellanicus. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 358: 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2008.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Epp, J., V.M. Bricelj, and R.E. Malouf. 1988. Seasonal partitioning and utilization of energy reserves in two age classes of the bay scallop Argopecten irradians irradians (Lamarck). Journal of experimental biology and ecology 121.Google Scholar
- FAO. 2008. The state of the world fisheries and aquaculture. Rome 2009.Google Scholar
- FAO. 2016a. FishStat plus—universal software for the fishery statistical time series. Fisheries and Aquaculture Department: Food and Agriculutra Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- FAO (2016b) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Rome 200 pp.Google Scholar
- Fraga, S., S.M. Gallager, and D.M. Anderson. 1989. Chain-forming dinoflagellates: an adaptation to red tides. In Red tides: biology, environmental science, and toxicology, ed. T. Okaichi, D.M. Anderson, and T. Nemoto, 281–284. Inc.: Evesier Science Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Glibert, P.M., J. Icarus Allen, Y. Artioli, et al. 2014. Vulnerability of coastal ecosystems to changes in harmful algal bloom distribution in response to climate change: projections based on model analysis. Global Change Biology 20: 3845–3858. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gobler, C.J., E.L. DePasquale, A.W. Griffith, and H. Baumann. 2014. Hypoxia and acidification have additive and synergistic negative effects on the growth, survival, and metamorphosis of early life stage bivalves. PLoS One 9: e83648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gobler, C.J., O.M. Doherty, T.K. Hattenrath-Lehman, et al. 2017. Ocean warming since 1982 has expanded the niche of toxic algal blooms in the North Atlantic and North Pacific Oceans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences In press.Google Scholar
- Hégaret, H., G. Wikfors, S. Shumway, and G. Rodrick. 2009. Biotoxin contamination and shellfish safety. Shellfish safety and quality: 43–80.Google Scholar
- Ho M-S, Zubkoff PL (1979) The effects of a Cochlodinium heterolobatum [algae] bloom on the survival and calcium uptake by larvae of the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica [Virginia]. Developments in marine biology.Google Scholar
- Jeong, H.J., Y.D. Yoo, J.S. Kim, et al. 2004. Mixotrophy in the phototrophic harmful alga Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Dinophycean): prey species, the effects of prey concentration, and grazing impact. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 51: 563–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00292.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim, H.G. 1997. Recent harmful algal blooms and mitigation strategies in Korea. Ocean and Polar Research 19: 185–192.Google Scholar
- Kim, Y.S., C.S. Jeong, G.T. Seong, et al. 2010. Diurnal vertical migration of Cochlodinium polykrikoides during the red tide in Korean coastal sea waters. Journal of Environmental Biology 31: 687–693.Google Scholar
- Morse, R.E., J. Shen, J.L. Blanco-Garcia, et al. 2011. Environmental and physical controls on the formation and transport of blooms of the dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides Margalef in the lower Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. Estuaries and Coasts 34: 1006–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-011-9398-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mos, L., J. Jack, D. Cullon, et al. 2004. The importance of marine foods to a near-urban first nation community in Coastal British Columbia, Canada: toward a risk-benefit assessment. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A 67: 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390490428224a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neiland, A.E., S.A. Shaw, and D. Bailly. 1991. The social and economic impact of quaculture: a European review. In Aquaculture and the environment, ed. N. De Pauw and J. Joyce. Gent, Belgium: European Aquacluture Soceity Special Publication.Google Scholar
- Newell, R.I. 2004. Ecosystem influences of natural and cultivated populations of suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs: a review. Journal of Shellfish Research 23: 51–62.Google Scholar
- NMFS (2015) Fisheries of the United States 2014. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA current fishery statistics no. 2014. National Marine Fisheries Service.Google Scholar
- Oreska, M.P.J., B. Truitt, R.J. Orth, and M.W. Luckenbach. 2017. The bay scallop (Argopecten irradians) industry collapse in Virginia and its implications for the successful management of scallop-seagrass habitats. Marine Policy 75: 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.10.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Orth, R.J., T.J.B. Carruthers, W.C. Dennison, et al. 2006. A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. Bioscience 56: 987–996. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[987:Agcfse]2.0.Co;2.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T.R., Y. Maita, and C. Lalli. 1984. A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
- Richlen, M.L., S.L. Morton, E.A. Jamali, et al. 2010. The catastrophic 2008–2009 red tide in the Arabian gulf region, with observations on the identification and phylogeny of the fish-killing dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides. Harmful Algae 9: 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2009.08.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schütt, F. 1895. Die Peridineen der Plankton-Expedition. Leipzig: Lipsius & Tischer.Google Scholar
- Shumway, S.E. 1990. A review of the effects of algal blooms on shellfish and aquaculture. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 21: 65–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1990.tb00529.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shumway, S.E., C. Davis, R. Downey, et al. 2003. Shellfish aquaculture–in praise of sustainable economies and environments. World Aquaculture 34: 8–10.Google Scholar
- Talmage, S.C., and C.J. Gobler. 2009. The effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentrations on the metamorphosis, size, and survival of larval hard clams (Mercenaria mercenaria), bay scallops (Argopecten irradians), and eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica). Limnology and Oceanography 54: 2072–2080. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6.2072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tolley, S.G., and A.K. Volety. 2005. The role of oysters in habitat use of oyster reefs by resident fishes and decapod crustaceans. Journal of Shellfish Research 24: 1007–1012. https://doi.org/10.2983/0730-8000(2005)24[1007:trooih]2.0.co;2.Google Scholar
- Wall, C.C., B.J. Peterson, and C.J. Gobler. 2011. The growth of estuarine resources (Zostera marina, Mercenaria mercenaria, Crassostrea virginica, Argopecten irradians, Cyprinodon variegatus) in response to nutrient loading and enhanced suspension feeding by adult shellfish. Estuaries and Coasts 34: 1262–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-011-9377-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.