Advertisement

Uses, Knowledge, and Management of the Threatened Pepper-Bark Tree (Warburgia salutaris) in Southern Mozambique

  • Annae M. SenkoroEmail author
  • Charlie M. Shackleton
  • Robert A. Voeks
  • Ana I. Ribeiro
Original Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Uses, Knowledge, and Management of the Threatened Pepper-Bark Tree (Warburgia salutaris) in Southern Mozambique.Warburgia salutaris, the pepper-bark tree, is one of the most highly valued medicinal plant species in southern Africa. Due to its popularity in folk medicine, it is overexploited in many regions and is deemed threatened throughout its range. We identified cultural and social drivers of use, compared knowledge distribution, determined management practices, and explored local ecological knowledge related to the species in the Lebombo Mountains, Tembe River, and Futi Corridor areas in southern Mozambique. Stratified random, semistructured interviews were conducted (182), complemented by 17 focus group discussions in the three study areas. W. salutaris was used medicinally to treat 12 health concerns, with the bark being the most commonly used part. Knowledge of the species varied between the three areas, but not with respondent gender or age. Harvesting was mostly through vertical bark stripping (71% of informants). To promote sustainable use of the species, we suggest multiple conservation approaches, including the use of alternative species with the same application, substitution of bark by leaves, and increases in alternative sources of plant material through cultivation. Additional information on species demography, harvest impact, and post-harvest bark recovery rate area is required. Information obtained in this work can contribute to management guidelines and plans for the species in Mozambique.

Key Words

Folk medicine gender local ecological knowledge quantitative ethnobotany threatened species trade 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the communities in the study area for sharing their knowledge, Mr. Firmino Guiliche for refining of the questionnaire and data organization, and Mr. Hugo Mabilana for the study area map. We are also grateful to the three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments/suggestions.

Funding Information

We are grateful to the Organization for Women in Science for the Developing World (OWSD), Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), Russell E. Train Education for Nature Program, World Wildlife Fund, and Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia through the research unit UID/AGR/04129/2013 (LEAF) for funding.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Authorization for the research was granted by traditional and local leaders, as well as ethics approval by the departmental committee at Rhodes University (November 2015).

Literature Cited

  1. Abdullahi, A. A. 2011. Trends and challenges of traditional medicine in Africa. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine 8(S): 115–123.Google Scholar
  2. Agbani, P. O., K. M. Kafoutchoni, K. V. Salako, R. C. Gbedomon, A. M. Kégbé, H. Karen, and B. Sinsin. 2018. Traditional ecological knowledge-based assessment of threatened woody species and their potential substitutes in the Atakora mountain chain, a threatened hotspot of biodiversity in Northwestern Benin, West Africa. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 14:21.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0219-6.Google Scholar
  3. Agundez, D., S. L. Mahamane, A. Alía, and M. Solino. 2018. Consumer preference for baobab products and implication for conservation and improvement policies of forest food resources in Niger (West Africa). Economic Botany 72(4): 396–410.Google Scholar
  4. Albuquerque, U. P. and R. F. Oliveira. 2007. Is the use-impact on native caatinga species in Brazil reduced by the high species richness of medicinal plants? Journal of Ethnopharmacology 113(1): 156–170.Google Scholar
  5. Atran, S., D. Medin, N. Ross, E. Lynch, V. Vapnarsky, E. Ucan Ek’, J. Coley, C. Timura, and M. Baran. 2002. Folkecology, cultural epidemiology, and the spirit of the commons: A garden experiment in the Maya lowlands, 1991–2001. Current Anthropology 43(3): 421–450.Google Scholar
  6. Bach, H. G., M. L. Wagner, R. A. Ricco, and R. H. Fortunato. 2014. Sale of medicinal herbs in pharmacies and herbal stores in Hurlingham district, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia 24(2): 258–264.Google Scholar
  7. Baldauf, C., C. E. Corrêa, M. Ciampi-Guillardi, J. C. Sfair, D. D. Pessoa, R. C. F. Oliveira, M. F. Machado, C. I. D. Milfono, T. C. H. Sunderland, and F. A. M. dos Santos. 2014. Moving from the ecological sustainability to the participatory management of Janaguba (Himatanthus drasticus, Apocynaceae). In: Ecological sustainability for non-timber forest products: Dynamics and case studies of harvesting, eds. C. M. Shackleton, A. K. Pandey, and T. Ticktin, 144–162. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  8. Barbhuiya, A. R., U. K. Sahoo, and K. Upadhyaya. 2016. Plant diversity in the indigenous home gardens in the eastern Himalayan region of Mizoram, northeast India. Economic Botany 70(2): 115–131.Google Scholar
  9. Berkes, F. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18(3): 621–630.Google Scholar
  10. Botha, J., E. T. F. Witkowski, and C. M. Shackleton 2004. The impact of commercial harvesting on Warburgia salutaris (‘pepper-bark tree’) in Mpumalanga, South Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 13(9): 1675–1698.Google Scholar
  11. Burrows, J., S. Burrows, M. Lotter, and E. Schmidt. 2018. Trees and shrubs: Mozambique. Cape Town: Print Matters Heritage.Google Scholar
  12. Bussmann, R. W., G. G. Gilbreath, J. Solio, M. Lutura, R. Lutuluo, K. Kunguru, N. Wood, and S. G. Mathenge. 2006. Plant use of the Masai of Sekeni Valley, Masai Mara Kenya. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2(22).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-2-22 .
  13. Byg, A. and H. Balslev. 2001. Diversity and use of palms in Zahamena, eastern Madagascar. Biodiversity and Conservation 10(6): 951–970.Google Scholar
  14. Chalmers, N. and C. Fabricius. 2007. Expert and generalist local knowledge about land-cover change on South Africa’s Wild Coast: Can local ecological knowledge add value to science? Ecology and Society 12(1): 10. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art10/ .. Accessed 09 March 2019.
  15. Charnley, S., A. P. Fischer, and E. T. Jones. 2007. Integrating traditional and local ecological knowledge into forest biodiversity conservation in the Pacific northwest. Forest Ecology and Management 246(1): 14–28.Google Scholar
  16. Chen, J. J., J. Zhang, and H. Xin-Qiang. 2014. Tissue regeneration after bark girdling: An ideal research tool to investigate plant vascular development and regeneration. Physiologia Plantarum 151(2): 147–155.Google Scholar
  17. Coates-Palgrave, M. 2002. Trees of southern Africa, 3rd edition, 2nd imp. Cape Town. Struik Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Colding, J. and C. Folke. 2001. Social taboos: “Invisible” system of local resource management and biological conservation. Ecological Applications 11(2): 584–600.Google Scholar
  19. Cunningham, A. B. 1993. African medicinal plants: Setting priorities at the interface between conservation and primary health care. People and Plants Working Paper 1. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2001. Applied ethnobotany: People, wild plant use and conservation. London: Earthscan Publication, Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Das, T. and A. S. Das. 2015. Conservation of plant diversity in rural homegardens with cultural and geographical variation in three districts of Barak Valley, northeast India. Economic Botany 69(1): 57–71.Google Scholar
  22. Delvaux, C., B. Sinsin, and P. van Damme. 2010. Impact of season, stem diameter and intensity of debarking on survival and bark re-growth pattern of medicinal tree species, Benin, West Africa. Biological Conservation 143(11): 2664–2671.Google Scholar
  23. Dludlu, M. N., P. S. Dlamini, G. S. Sibandze, V. S. Vilane, and C. S. Dlamini. 2017. The distribution and conservation status of the endangered pepperbark tree Warburgia salutaris (Canellacaeae) in Swaziland. Oryx 51(3): 441–454.Google Scholar
  24. Dovie, D. B., E. T. F. Witkowski, and C. M. Shackleton. 2008. Knowledge of plant resource use based on location, gender and generation. Applied Geography 28(4): 311–322.Google Scholar
  25. Fonseca, F. N. and M. J. Balick. 2018. Plant-knowledge adaptation in an urban setting: Candomblé ethnobotany in New York City. Economic Botany 72(1): 56–70.Google Scholar
  26. Franco-Maass, S., G. M. Arredondo-Ayala, Y. Cruz-Balderas, and A. Endara-Agramont. 2019. The use of dye plants in a Mazahua community in central Mexico. Economic Botany 73(1): 13–27.Google Scholar
  27. Gandji, K., V. K. Salako, A. B. Fandohan, A. E. Assogbadjo, and R. L. G. Kakaï. 2018. Factors determining the use and cultivation of Moringa oleifera Lam. in the Republic of Benin. Economic Botany 72(3): 332–345.Google Scholar
  28. Gaoue, O. and T. Ticktin. 2007. Patterns of harvesting foliage and bark from the multipurpose tree Khaya senegalensis in Benin: Variation across ecological regions and its impacts on population structure. Biological Conservation 137(3): 424–436.Google Scholar
  29. Gaoue, O. G., M. A. Coe, M. Bond, G. Hart, B. C. Seyler, and H. McMillen. 2017. Theories and major hypotheses in ethnobotany. Economic Botany 71(3): 269–287.Google Scholar
  30. Ghimire, S. K., D. McKey, and Y. Aumeeruddy-Thomas. 2004. Heterogeneity in ethnoecological knowledge and management of medicinal plants in the Himalayas of Nepal: Implications for conservation. Ecology and Society 9(3): 6. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art6/. Accessed 20 September 2015.
  31. Ghorbani, A., G. Langenberger, J. X. Liu, S. Wehnerand, and J. Sauerborn. 2012. Diversity of medicinal and food plants as non-timber forest products in Naban River watershed national nature reserve (China): Implications for livelihood improvement and biodiversity conservation. Economic Botany 66(2): 178–191.Google Scholar
  32. Giday, M., Z. Asfaw, T. Elmqvist, and Z. Woldu. 2003. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the Zay people in Ethiopia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 85(1): 43–52.Google Scholar
  33. GM. Governo de Moçambique. 2011. Decreto no 40/2011 de 2 de Setembro, I Serie nr 35, Boletim da República. Impressa Nacional de Moçambique, E.P.Google Scholar
  34. Governo do Distrito de Matutuine (GDM). 2008. Plano estratégico do desenvolvimento do distrito de Matutuine (2009–2013). Governo do Distrito de Matutuine, Bela Vista.Google Scholar
  35. Grande, J. T., J. R. S. Tabuti, and P. van Damme. 2009. Ethnoveterinary knowledge in pastoral Karamoja, Uganda. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 122(2): 273–293.Google Scholar
  36. Hannweg, K., M. Hofmeyer, and T. Grove. 2015. The pepperbark initiative: Are we closer to efficiently propagating Warburgia salutaris? http://www.sanparks.org/assets/docs/conservation/scientific_new/savanna/ssnm2015/the-pepperbark-initiative-are-we-any-closer-to-efficiently-propagating-warburgia-salutaris.pdf. (15 October 2015).
  37. Hellier, A., A. C. Newton, and S. O. Gaona. 1999. Use of indigenous knowledge for rapidly assessing trends in biodiversity: A case study from Chiapas, Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation 8(7): 869–889.Google Scholar
  38. Huai, H., W. E. Xu, G. Wen, and W. Bai. 2011. Comparison of the homegardens of eight cultural groups in Jinping county, southwest China. Economic Botany 65(4): 345–355.Google Scholar
  39. Hunde, D., C. Abedeta, T. Birhan, and M. Sharma. 2015. Gendered division of labor in medicinal plant cultivation and management in south west Ethiopia: Implication for conservation. Trends in Applied Sciences Research 10(2): 77–87.Google Scholar
  40. INE. Instituto Nacional de Estatística. 2013a. Estatísticas do distrito de Matutuine. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Maputo.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 2013b. Estatísticas do distrito de Namaacha. Instituto Nacional de Estatística.Google Scholar
  42. ——— 2015. Projeções da população 2007–2040. Relatorio final do inquérito ao orçamento familiar 2014/15. Instituto Nacional de Estatística Maputo.Google Scholar
  43. Izidine, S. A. 2003. Licuáti forestry reserve, Mozambique: Flora, utilization and conservation. M.S. thesis, Universtity of Pretoria.Google Scholar
  44. Jann, B., J. Jerke, and I. Krumpal. 2012. Asking sensitive questions using a crosswise model: An experimental model survey measuring plagiarism. Public Opinion Quarterly 76(1): 32–49.Google Scholar
  45. Jansen, P. C. M. and O. Mendes. 1990. Plantas medicinais: Seu uso tradicional em Moçambique Tomo 3. Maputo: Imprensa do Partido, Maputo.Google Scholar
  46. Jones, J. P. G, M. M. Andriamarovololona, N. Hockley, J. M. Gibbons, and E. J. Milner-Gulland. 2008. Testing the use of interviews as a tool for monitoring trends in the harvesting of wild species. Journal of Applied Ecology 45(4): 1205–1212.Google Scholar
  47. Kideghesho, J. R. 2009. The potentials of traditional African cultural practices in mitigating overexploitation of wildlife species and habitat loss: Experience of Tanzania. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management 5(2): 83–94.Google Scholar
  48. Kirkiwood, D. 2014. Southeastern Africa: Mozambique, Swaziland, and so. tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests. https://www.worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/at0119. (25 February 2019).
  49. Kouki, J., K. Arnold, and P. Martikainen. 2004. Long-term persistence of aspen—a key host for many threatened species—is endangered in old-growth conservation areas in Finland. Journal for Nature Conservation 12(1): 41–52.Google Scholar
  50. Krog, M., M. P. Falcão, and C. S. Olsen. 2006. Medicinal plant markets and trade in Maputo, Mozambique. Forest and landscape working papers, No. 16–2006. Copenhagen: Danish Center for Forest, Landscape and Planning, KVL.Google Scholar
  51. Kujawska, M., F. Zamudio, L. Montti, and V. P. Carrillo. 2018. Effects of landscape structure on medicinal plant richness in home gardens: Evidence for the environmental scarcity compensation hypothesis. Economic Botany 72(2): 150–165.Google Scholar
  52. Lima, I. L. P., A. Scariot, and A. B. Giroldo. 2013. Sustainable harvest of mangaba (Hancornia speciosa) fruits in northern Minas Gerais, Brazil. Economic Botany 67(3): 234–243.Google Scholar
  53. Lowore, J., J. Meaton, and A. Wood. 2018. African forest honey: An overlooked NTFP with potential to support livelihoods and forests. Environmental Management 62(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
  54. Lozada, M., A. Ladio, and M. Weigandt. 2006. Cultural transmission of ethnobotanical knowledge in rural community of northwestern Patagonia, Argentina. Economic Botany 60(4): 374–385.Google Scholar
  55. MAE. Ministério de Administração Estatal. 2005a. Perfil do distrito de Matutuine, província de Maputo. Portal do Governo de Moçambique. http://www.portaldogoverno.gov.mz/Informacao/distritos/ (20 July 2011).
  56. ——— 2005b. Perfil do distrito de Namaacha, província de Maputo. Portal do Governo de Moçambique. http://www.portaldogoverno.gov.mz/Informacao/distritos/ (20 July 2011).
  57. Mander, M., N. Diederichs, and N. Steytler. 2006. Marketing of medicinal plants and products. In: Commercialising medicinal plants: A southern African guide, ed. N. Diederichs, 168–192. Stellenbosch: Sun Press.Google Scholar
  58. Maroyi, A. 2012. Community attitudes towards the reintroduction programme for the endangered pepperbark tree Warburgia salutaris: Implications for plant conservation in south-east Zimbabwe. Oryx 46(2): 213–218.Google Scholar
  59. ———. 2013. Warburgia salutaris (Bertol. f.) Chiov.: A multi-use ethnomedicinal plant species. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 7(2): 53–60.Google Scholar
  60. ———. 2014. The genus Warburgia: A review of its traditional uses and pharmacology. Pharmaceutical Biology 52(3): 378–391.Google Scholar
  61. Mathez-Stiefel, S. I. and I. Vanderbroek. 2012. Distribution and transmission of medicinal plants knowledge in the Andeans highlands: A case study from Peru and Bolivia. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. ID 959285:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/959285.Google Scholar
  62. Matthews, W. S., A. E. van Wyk, N. van Rooyen, and G. A. Botha. 2001. Vegetation of the Tembe Elephant Park, Maputaland, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 67: 573–594.Google Scholar
  63. Mbambezeli, G., 2004 Warburgia salutaris (Bertol.f.) Chiov. http://pza.sanbi.org/warburgia-salutaris (5 March 2019).
  64. MITUR. Ministério de Turismo. 2002. Proposta de demarcação do Corredor de Futi., https://www.scribd.com/document/6805952/GEF-Futi-Corridor-Proposal-Part-A (18 March 2019).
  65. Moll, E. J. 1980. Terrestrial plant ecology. In: Studies on the ecology of Maputaland, eds. M. N. Bruton and K. H. Cooper, 52–68. Cape Town: Cape and Transvaal Printers (Pty), Ltd.Google Scholar
  66. Monteiro, J. M., U. P. Albuquerque, E. M. F. Lins-Neto, E. L. Araújo, and E. L. C. Amorim. 2006. Use patterns and knowledge of medicinal species among two rural communities in Brazil’s semi-arid northeastern region. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 105(1–2): 173–186.Google Scholar
  67. Moyo, M., O. Adeyemi, A. O. Aremu, and J. van Staden. 2015. Medicinal plants: An invaluable, dwindling resource in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 174: 595–606.Google Scholar
  68. Mukamuri, B. B. and W. Kozanayi. 2014. Commercialization and institutional arrangements involving tree species harvested for bark by smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. In: Bark use, management and commerce in Africa, eds. A. B. Cunningham, B. M. Campbell, and M. K. Luckert, 247–254. New York: The New York Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
  69. Naah, J.-B. and R. T. Guuroh. 2017. Factors influencing local ecological knowledge of forage resources: Ethnobotanical evidence from West Africa’s savannas. Journal of Environmental Management 188: 297–307.Google Scholar
  70. Nuno, A. and F. A. V. St. John. 2014. How to ask sensitive questions in conservation: A review of specialized questioning technique. Biological Conservation 189: 5–15.Google Scholar
  71. Opperman, E. J., M. I. Cherry, and N. P. Makunga. 2018. Community harvesting of trees used as dens and for food by the tree hyrax (Dendrohyrax arboreus) in the Pirie forest, South Africa. Koedoe 60(1).  https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v60i1.1481
  72. Pandey, A. K. 2015. Sustainable bark harvesting of important medicinal tree species in India. In: Ecological sustainability for non-timber forest products: Dynamics and case studies of harvesting, eds. C. M. Shackleton, A. K. Pandey, and T. Ticktin, 163–178. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  73. Panyadee, P., H. Balslev, P. Wangpakapattanawong, and A. Inta. 2018. Karen homegardens: Characteristics, functions, and species diversity. Economic Botany 72 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
  74. Pérez-Nicolás, M., H. Vibrans, A. Romero-Manzanares, A. Saynes-Vásquez, M. Luna-Cavazos, M. Flores-Cruz, and R. Lira-Saade. 2017. Patterns of knowledge and use of medicinal plants in Santiago Camotlán, Oaxaca, Mexico. Economic Botany 71(3): 209–223.Google Scholar
  75. Phillips, O. and A. H. Gentry. 1993. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional hypothesis testing in quantitative ethnobotany. Economic Botany 47(1): 33–43.Google Scholar
  76. Pieroni, A. and R. Sõukand. 2018. Forest as stronghold of local ecological practices: Currently used wild food plants in Polesia, northern Ukraine. Economic Botany 72(3): 311–331.Google Scholar
  77. Quinlan, M. B., R. J. Quinlan, S. K. Council, and J. W. Roulette. 2016. Children’s acquisition of ethnobotanical knowledge in a Caribbean horticultural village. Journal of Ethnobiology 36(2): 433–456.Google Scholar
  78. Rakotoarisoa, T. F., T. Richter, H. Rakotondramanana, and J. Mantilla-Contrearas. 2016. Turning a problem into profit: Using water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) for making handicrafts at Lake Alaotra, Madagascar. Economic Botany 70(4) 365–379.Google Scholar
  79. Romero, C. 2014. Bark structure and functional ecology. In: Bark use, management and commerce in Africa, eds. A. B. Cunningham, B. M. Campbell, and M. K. Luckert, 5–25. New York: The New York Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
  80. Samie, A. and F. Mashau. 2013. Antifungal activities of fifteen southern African medicinal plants against five Fusarium species. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 7(25): 1839–1848.Google Scholar
  81. Schmidt, I. B. and T. Ticktin. 2012. When lessons from population models and local ecological knowledge coincide—Effects of flower stalk harvesting in the Brazilian savanna. Biological Conservation 152:187–195.Google Scholar
  82. Shackleton, C. M., A. K. Pandey, and T. Ticktin. 2015. Ecologically sustainable harvesting of non-timber forest products: Disarming the narrative and the complexity. In: Ecological sustainability for non-timber forest products: Dynamics and case studies of harvesting, eds. C. M. Shackleton, A. K. Pandey, and T. Ticktin, 260–278. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  83. Shackleton, C. M., A. K. Pandey, T. Ticktin, and A. B. Cunningham. 2018. Nontimber forest products as ecological and biocultural keystone species. Ecology and Society 23(4):22. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss4/art22/.Google Scholar
  84. Silva, A. P. T., P. M. de Medeiros, W. S. F. Júnior, and R. R. V. Silva. 2018. Does forest scarcity affect the collection and use of firewood by rural communities? A case study in the Atlantic forest of northeastern Brazil. Economic Botany 72(1): 71–80.Google Scholar
  85. Souto, T. and T. Ticktin. 2012. Understanding interrelationships among predictors (age, gender, and origin) of local ecological knowledge. Economic Botany 66(2): 149–164.Google Scholar
  86. Stanley, D., R. Voeks, and L. Short. 2012. Is non-timber forest product harvest sustainable in the less developed world? A systematic review of the recent economic and ecological literature. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 1(9).  https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2012-8-1.9-1-39.
  87. Steele, M. Z. and C. M. Shackleton. 2010. Using local experts as benchmarks for household local ecological knowledge: Scoring in South African savannas. Journal of Environmental Management 91(8): 1641–1646.Google Scholar
  88. Stewart, K. 2009. Effects of bark harvest and other human activity on populations of the African cherry (Prunus africana) on Mount Oku, Cameroon. Forest Ecology and Management 258(7): 1121–1128.Google Scholar
  89. Sylvester, O. and G. Alvaro. 2009. Illegal palm heart (Geonoma edulis) harvest in Costa Rican national parks: Patterns of consumption and extraction. Economic Botany 63(2): 179–189.Google Scholar
  90. Terer, T., A. M. Muasya, F. Dahdouh-Guebas, G. G. Ndiritu, and L. Lugwig-Triestr. 2012. Integrating local ecological knowledge and management practices of an isolated semi-arid papyrus swamp (Loboi, Kenya) into a wider conservation framework. Journal of Environmental Management 93: 71–84.Google Scholar
  91. Tewari, D. D. 2012. Promoting non-timber forest products (NTFPs) to alleviate poverty and hunger in rural South Africa: A reflection on management and policy challenges. African Journal of Business Management 6(47): 11635–11647.Google Scholar
  92. Ticktin, T. and T. Johns. 2002. Chinanteco management of Aechmea magoalenae: Implication for the use of TEK and TRM in the management plans. Economic Botany 56(2):177–191.Google Scholar
  93. Tourangeau, R. and T. Yan. 2007. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin 133(5): 859–83.Google Scholar
  94. Turvey, S. T., C. L. Risley, J. E. Moore, L. A. Barrett, H. Yujiang, Z. Xiujiang, Z. Kaiya, and W. Ding. 2013. Can local ecological knowledge be used to assess status and extinction drivers in threatened freshwater cetacean? Biological Conservation 157: 352–360.Google Scholar
  95. van Rooyen, N. 1983. Die plantegroei van die Roodeplaatdam-natuurreservaat II. Die plantgemeenskappe. Suid-Afrikaanse. Tydskrif van Plantkunde 2(2): 115–125.Google Scholar
  96. van Wilgen, N. J., M. Dopolo, A. Symonds, W. Vermeulen, E. Bester, K. Smith, and M. A. McGeoch. 2013. An inventory of natural resources harvested from national parks in South Africa. Koedoe 55(1).  https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v55i1.1096.
  97. van Wyk, B.-E. and M. Wink. 2004. Medicinal plants of the world, 1st ed. Pretoria: Briza Publications.Google Scholar
  98. Veeman, M. M., M. L. Cocks, F. Muwonge, S. K. Chonge, and B. M. Campbell. 2014a. Markets for three bark products in Zimbabwe: A case study of markets for Adansonia digitata, Berchemia discolor and Warburgia salutaris. In: Bark use, management and commerce in Africa, eds. A. B. Cunningham, B. M. Campbell, and M. K. Luckert, 227–245. New York: The New York Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
  99. Veeman, T. S., A. B. Cunningham, and W. Kozanayo. 2014b. The economics of production of rare medicinal species introduced in southwestern Zimbabwe: Warburgia salutaris. In: Bark use, management and commerce in Africa, eds. A. B. Cunningham, B. M. Campbell, and M. K. Luckert, 179–188. New York: The New York Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
  100. Venter, F. and J. Venter. 1996. Making the most of indigenous trees. Pretoria: Briza PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  101. Venter, S. M. and E. T. F. Witkowski. 2010. Baobao (Adansonia digitata L.) density, size-class distribution and population trends between four land-use types in northern Venda, South Africa. Forest Ecology and Management 259(3): 294–300.Google Scholar
  102. Voeks, R. 2004. Disturbance pharmacopoeias: Medicine and myth from the humid tropics. Annals of Association of American Geographers 94(4): 868–888.Google Scholar
  103. ———. 2007. Are women reservoirs of traditional plant knowledge? Gender, ethnobotany and globalization in northeastern Brazil. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 28(1): 7–20.Google Scholar
  104. ———. 2018. The ethnobotany of Eden: Rethinking the jungle medicine narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  105. Wang, Y. H., M. Shi, H. M. Niu, J. Yang, M. Y. Xia, J. F. Luo, Y. J. Chen, Y. P. Zhou, and H. Li. 2018. Substituting one Paris for another? In vitro cytotoxic and in vivo antitumor activities of Paris forrestii, a substitute of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 218(1): 45–50.Google Scholar
  106. Ward, C., G. Holmes, and L. Stringer. 2017. Perceived barriers to and drivers of community participation in protected-area governance. Conservation Biology 32(2): 437–446.Google Scholar
  107. Williams, V. L., K. Balkwill, and E. T. F. Witkowski. 2014a. Estimates of bark mass for six tree species used medicinally in South Africa. In: Bark use, management and commerce in Africa, eds. A. B. Cunningham, B. M. Campbell, and M. K. Luckert, 59–77. New York: The New York Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
  108. Williams, V. L., K. Balkwill, E. T. F Witkowski, and K. Balkwill 2014b. Assessing harvesting impacts for the species used medicinally in South Africa: Estimates of the number of individual trees debarked annually. In: Bark use, management and commerce in Africa, eds. A. B. Cunningham, B. M. Campbell, and M. K. Luckert, 115–135. New York: The New York Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
  109. Williams, N. E., A. R. Carrico, I. Edirisinghe, and P. J. Champika. 2018. Assessing the impacts of agrobiodiversity maintenance on food security among farming households in Sri Lanka’s dry zone. Economic Botany 72 (2): 196–206.Google Scholar
  110. Xaba, P. and R. McVay. 2010. The pepper-bark tree. Veld and Flora 96(1): 40–42.Google Scholar
  111. Zschocke, S., T. Rabe, J. L. S. Taylor, A. K. Jäger, and J. van Staden. 2000. Plant part substitution—A way to conserve endangered medicinal plants? Journal of Ethnopharmacology 71(1–2): 281–292.Google Scholar
  112. Zschocke, S. and J. van Staden. 2000. Cryptocarya species—Substitute plants for Ocotea bullata? A pharmacological investigation in terms of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 inhibition. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 71(3): 473–478.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental ScienceRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Departmento de Ciências BiológicasUniversidade Eduardo MondlaneMaputoMozambique
  3. 3.Department of Geography and the EnvironmentCalifornia State University, FullertonFullertonUSA
  4. 4.Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF)Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  5. 5.Centro de BiotecnologiaUniversidade Eduardo MondlaneMaputoMozambique

Personalised recommendations