Economic Botany

, Volume 72, Issue 4, pp 396–410 | Cite as

Consumer Preferences for Baobab Products and Implication for Conservation and Improvement Policies of Forest Food Resources in Niger (West Africa)

  • Dolores Agúndez
  • Sitou Lawali
  • Ali Mahamane
  • Ricardo Alía
  • Mario SoliñoEmail author


Consumer Preferences for Baobab Products and Implication for Conservation and Improvement Policies of Forest Food Resources in Niger (West Africa).Adansonia digitata L. (African baobab) provides a wide range of market products in Niger. These products are highly important in the traditional dishes and are also a cultural asset for the Nigerien households. The main objective of this study is to assess the local consumers’ preferences for marketed baobab products and to infer key elements in order to design conservation strategies at local and national levels. A total of 432 consumers were surveyed in eight rural and four urban markets in Niger. Results from a contingent valuation application show that 61% of the consumers are willing to pay a mean of 24.7% above the current market prices. These funds would favor the implementation of a conservation and improvement program for assuring the availability of baobab products in the market and conserving the baobab resources. Promoting health and food security based on the development of these products will likely also play a role in favoring the conservation of the species. Préférences des Consommateurs pour les Produits du Baobab et implication pour les Politiques de Conservation et d’Amélioration des Ressources Alimentaires Forestières au Niger (Afrique de l’Ouest).Adansonia digitata L. (baobab africain) fournit une large gamme de produits du marché au Niger. Ces produits sont très importants dans les plats traditionnels et constituent également un atout culturel pour les ménages nigériens. L’objectif principal de cet article est d’évaluer les préférences des consommateurs locaux pour les produits du baobab commercialisés et de déduire des éléments clés afin de concevoir des stratégies de conservation aux niveaux local et national. Au total, 432 consommateurs ont été enquêtés dans 8 marchés ruraux et 4 marchés urbains au Niger. Les résultats de l’application de la méthode d’évaluation contingente montrent que 61% des consommateurs sont prêts à payer 24,7% au-dessus des prix actuels du marché. Ces fonds favoriseraient la mise en place d’un programme de conservation et d’amélioration à fin d’assurer la disponibilité des produits du baobab sur le marché et la conservation des ressources du baobab. La promotion de la santé et de la sécurité alimentaire basée sur le développement de ces produits jouera également un rôle dans la conservation de l’espèce.

Key Words

Adansonia digitata agroforestry contingent valuation willingness to pay 



We would like to thank all the people who have participated in this study: mainly the respondents and the countless people who cooperated selflessly in the field work, including the local interviewers and colleagues at Université Dan Dicko Dankoulodo de Maradi and at Université de Diffa.

Funding Information

This work was financed by Project AECID 2014/ACDE/003520: “Access to, conservation of, management of, and recovery of woody food species in Niger.”

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12231_2018_9427_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (139 kb)
ESM 1 The questionnaire (PDF 139 kb)

Literature Cited

  1. Abasse, T. A., A. Gouzaye, L. Woltering, and D. Pasternak. 2007. The role of indigenous leafy vegetables on daily diet and rural and urban economy of Niger. Acta Horticola 752:35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adenegan, K. O. and R. A. Fatai. 2015. Market potentials for selected organic leafy vegetables. International Journal of Vegetable Science 22(3):251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agúndez, D. 2018. Participation of society in breeding and conservation programs for food tree species in Niger (West Africa). Ph.D. thesis, University of Valladolid, Valladolid.Google Scholar
  4. ———, S. Douma, J. Madrigal, A. Gómez-Ramos, B. Vinceti, R. Alía, and A. Mahamane. 2016. Conservation of food tree species in Niger: Towards a participatory approach in rural communities. Forest Systems 25(3):e080.
  5. Álvarez-Farizo, B., N. Hanley, R. E. Wright, and D. MacMillan. 1999. Estimating the benefits of agri-environmental policy: Econometric issues in open-ended contingent valuation studies. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42:23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amin, A. and I. Koné. 2015. People and protected areas: An assessment of cost and benefits of conservation to local people in Southeastern Ivory Coast. Society and Natural Resources 28:925–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arnold, M., B. Powell, P. Shanley, and T. C. H. Sunderland. 2011. Editorial: Forests, biodiversity and food security. International Forestry Review 13:259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Assogbadjo, A. E. and J. Loo. 2011. Adansonia digitata, African baobab. Conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources of priority food tree species in Sub-Saharan Africa. Biodiversity International (Rome, Italy). 12 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Boedecker, J., C. Termote, A. E. Assogbadjo, P. Van Damme, and C. Lachat. 2014. Dietary contribution of wild edible plants to women’s diets in the buffer zone around the Lama forest, Benin: An underutilized potential. Food Security 6:833–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boffa, J. M. 1999. Agroforestry parklands in Sub-Saharan Africa. FAO conservation guide. Vol. 34. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  11. Carson, R. T. 2012. Contingent valuation: A practical alternative when prices aren’t available. Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(4):27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chadare, F. J., Y. E. Madode, N. Fanou-Fogny, J. M. Kindossi, J. O. G. Ayosso, S. H. Honfo, A. P. P. Kayodé, A. R. Linnemann, and D. J. Hounhouigan. 2018. Indigenous food ingredients for complementary food formulations to combat infant malnutrition in Benin: A review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 98:439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Caluwé, E., S. De Smedt, A. E. Assogbadjo, R. Samson, B. Sinsin, and P. Van Damme. 2009. Ethnic differences in use value and use patterns of baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) in northern Benin. African Journal of Ecology 47:433–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhillion, S. S. and G. Gustad. 2004. Local management practices influence the viability of the baobab (Adansonia digitata Linn.) in different land use types, Cinzana, Mali. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 101:85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Douma, S., R. Chaibou, A. Mahamane, D. H. N’da, and M. Saadou. 2010. État actuel de dégradation des populations de quatre espèces ligneuses fruitières en zone sahelo soudanienne du Niger: Réserve Totale de Faune de Tamou. Revue Ivoirienne de Science et Technologie 16:191–210.Google Scholar
  16. Endamana, D., K. A. Angu, G. Akwah, G. Shepherd, and B. C. Ntumwel. 2016. Contribution of non-timber forest products to cash and non-cash income of remote forest communities in Central Africa. International Forestry Revue 18:280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fady, B., J. Cottrell, L. Ackzell, R. Alia, B. Muys, A. Prada, and S. C. Gonzalez-Martinez. 2016. Forests and global change: What can genetics contribute to the major forest management and policy challenges of the twenty-first century? Regional Environmental Change 16:927–939.Google Scholar
  18. FAO. 2017. Strengthening sector policies for better food security and nutrition results. Policy guidance note n°3. Forestry. Rome, 28 pp.Google Scholar
  19. FAO, FLD, and IPGRI. 2004. Forest genetic resources conservation and management. Vol. 1. Overview, concepts and some systematic approaches. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy. 115 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Fiamohe, R., T. Nakelse, A. Diagne, and P. A. Seck. 2006. Assessing the effect of consumer purchasing criteria for types of rice in Togo: A choice modeling approach. Agribusiness 30:31–45.Google Scholar
  21. Gebauer, J. A., O. Yahia, A. C. Sanchez, D. Darr, E. S. Eltahir, E. M. Fadl, G. Fernsebner, M. Frei, T. Y. Habte, K. Hammer, M. Hunsche, H. Johnson, M. Kordofani, M. Krawinkel, F. Kugler, E. Luedeling, T. E. Mahmoud, A. Maina, D. Mithöfer, C. R. Y. Munthali, G. Noga, R. North, W. O. Owino, K. Prinz, F. K. Rimberia, A. Saied, M. Schüring, A. Sennhem, M. A. Späth, M. E. Taha, A. Triebel, F. Wichern, M. Wiehle, N. Wrage-Mönnig, and K. Kehlenbeck. 2016. Africa’s wooden elephant: The baobab tree (Adansonia digitata L.) in Sudan and Kenya: A review. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 63:377–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haut-Commissariat à l’initiative 3N. 2012. Initiative 3N pour la Sécurité Alimentaire et le Développement agricole Durable « Les nigériens nourrissent les nigériens ». Cadre stratégique. République du Niger. 69 pp. 26 Oct 2018.
  23. Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heubach, K., R. Wittig, E. A. Nuppenau, and K. Hahn. 2013. Local values, social differentiation and conservation efforts: The impact of ethnic affiliation on the valuation of NTFP species in Northern Benin, West Africa. Human Ecology 41:513–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hyarcinthe, T., P. Charles, K. Adama, C. S. Diarra, M. H. Dicki, J. J. Sveigaard, and B. Diawara. 2015. Variability of vitamins B1, B2 and minerals content in baobab (Adansonia digitata) leaves in East and West Africa. Food Science and Nutrition 3(1):17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ickowitz, A., B. Powell, M. Salim, and T. C. H. Sunderland. 2014. Dietary quality and tree cover in Africa. Global Environmental Change 24:287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jama, B. A., A. M. Mohamed, J. Mulatya, and A. N. Njui. 2007. Comparing the “Big Five”: A framework for the sustainable management of indigenous fruit trees in the drylands of East and Central Africa. Ecological Indicators 8(2):170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Langat, D. K., E. K. Maranga, A. A. Aboud, and J. K. Cheboiwo. 2016. Role of forest resources to local livelihoods: The case of East Mau forest ecosystem, Kenya. International Journal of Forestry Research.
  29. Leach, H. B., C. van der Stege, and C. R. Vogl. 2011. Baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) and Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) management strategies in the midst of conflict and change: A Dogon case study from Mali. Human Ecology 39:597–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MESU/DD. 2016. Stratégie et Plan d’Actions de Promotion des Produits Forestiers Non Ligneux (PFNL) au Niger.Google Scholar
  31. Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  32. Moussa, B., E. Nkonya, S. Meyer, E. Kato, T. Johnson, and J. Hawkins. 2016. Economics of land degradation and improvement in Niger. In: Economics of land degradation and improvement—A global assessment for sustainable development, eds. E. Nkonya, A. Mirzabaev, and J. von Braun, 499–539. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mugido, W. and C. M. Shackleton. 2017. The safety net function of NTFPs in different agro-ecological zones of South Africa. Population and Environment 39:107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Muller, J. and A. M. Almedom. 2008. What is “famine food”? Distinguishing between traditional vegetables and special foods for times of hunger/scarcity (Boumba, Niger). Human Ecology 36:599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ndjeunga, J. and C. H. Nelson. 2005. Toward understanding household preference for consumption characteristics of millet varieties: A case study from western Niger. Agricultural Economics 32:151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ngouhouo J., J. Abildtrup, D. Jean, and P. Delacote. 2016. The value of endangered forest elephants to local communities in a transboundary conservation landscape. Ecological Economics 126:70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Onjanantenaina, C., D. Andriafidison, J. Hanta, S. Rabesihanaka, and R. K. B. Jenkins. 2014. Les baobabs de Madagascar: Quel cadre réglementaire pour leur conservation? Madagascar Conservation and Development 9(1):31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pramova, E., B. Locatelli, H. Djoudi, and O. A. Somorin. 2012. Forests and trees for social adaptation to climate variability and change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 3:581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rakotoarivelo, N., A. Razanatsima, , F. Rakotoarivony, L. Rasoaviety, A. V. Ramarosandratana, V. Jeannoda, A. R. Kuhlman, A. Randrianasolo, and R. W. Bussmann. 2014. Ethnobotanical and economic value of Ravenala madagascariensis Sonn. in Eastern Madagascar. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 10:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sanchez, A. C., P. E. Osborne, and N. Haq, N. 2011. Climate change and the African baobab (Adansonia digitata L.): The need for better conservation strategies. African Journal of Ecology 49:234–245.Google Scholar
  41. Schumann, K., R. Wittig, A. Thiombiano, U. Becker, and K. Hahn. 2010. Impact of land-use type and bark- and leaf-harvesting on population structure and fruit production of the baobab tree (Adansonia digitata L.) in a semi-arid savanna, West Africa. Forest Ecology and Management 260:2035–2044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ———, ———, ———, ———, and ———. 2012. Uses, management, and population status of the baobab in eastern Burkina Faso. Agroforestry Systems 85:263–278.Google Scholar
  43. Siddo, S., N. Moula, I. Hamadou, M. Issa, H. Marichatou, P. Leroy, and N. Antoine-Moussiaux. 2015. Breeding criteria and willingness to pay for improved Azawak zebu sires in Niger. Archives Animal Breeding 58:251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Soliño, M., A. Prada, and M. X. Vázquez. 2010. Designing a forest-energy policy to reduce forest fires in Galicia (Spain): A contingent valuation application. Journal of Forest Economics 16:217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suleiman, M. S., V. O. Wasonga, J. S. Mbau, A. Suleiman, and Y. A. Elhadi. 2017. Non-timber forest products and their contribution to households income around Falgore Game Reserve in Kano, Nigeria. Ecological Processes 6:23.
  46. Swanson T., S. Mourato, J. Swierzbinski, and A. Kontoleon. 2002. Conflicts in conservation: The many values of the black rhinoceros. In: Valuing the environment in developing countries—Case studies, eds. D. Pearce, C. Pearce, and C. Palmer, 169–205. UK/USA: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar
  47. Tilahun, M., L. Vranken, B. Muys, J. Deckers, K. Gebregziabher, K. Gebrehiwot, H. Bauer, and E. Mathijs. 2015. Rural households’ demand for frankincense forest conservation in Tigray, Ethiopia: A contingent valuation analysis. Land Degradation and Development 26:642–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. UNEP. 2012. Sahel Atlas of changing landscapes: Tracing trends and variations in vegetation cover and soil condition. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
  49. Vedeld, P., A. Angelsen, J. Bojö, E. Sjaastad, and G. Kobugabe-Berg. 2007. Forest environmental incomes and the rural poor. Forest Policy and Economics 9:869–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Venter, S. M. and E. T. F. Witkowski. 2011. Baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) fruit production in communal and conservation land-use types in Southern Africa. Forest Ecology and Management 261:630–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Waeber, P., L. Reibelt, I. Randriamalala, G. Moser, L. Raveloarimalala, F. Ralainasolo, J. Ratsimbazafy, and L. Woolaver. 2017. Local awareness and perceptions: Consequences for conservation of marsh habitat at Lake Alaotra for one of the world’s rarest lemurs. Oryx 1–10:

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dolores Agúndez
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sitou Lawali
    • 3
  • Ali Mahamane
    • 4
  • Ricardo Alía
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mario Soliño
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Forest Research Centre (CIFOR)National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (INIA)MadridSpain
  2. 2.iuFOR, Sustainable Forest Management Research InstituteUniversity of Valladolid and INIAValladolidSpain
  3. 3.Université Dan Dicko Dankoulodo de MaradiMaradiNiger
  4. 4.Université de DiffaDiffaNiger
  5. 5.Complutense Institute for International Studies (ICEI)Complutense University of MadridPozuelo de AlarcónSpain

Personalised recommendations