Folia Microbiologica

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 189–195 | Cite as

Comparative restriction enzyme mapping of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from turkeys and broilers based on flaA flagellar gene using HpyF3I endonuclease

  • Elham Atefi Tabar
  • Hamid StajiEmail author
  • Ali Mahdavi
Original Article


Turkeys and broilers have been identified as important reservoirs for Campylobacter jejuni which is of public health significance. The evaluation of the genotypes among C. jejuni strains within different reservoirs is critical for our understanding of the epidemiology of this infectious agent. The present study aimed to compare the genetic diversity and differences of C. jejuni isolates from turkeys and broilers using flagellin PCR-RFLP typing (flaA typing) technique, in terms of the ease of use and discriminatory power. Sixty C. jejuni isolates were detected biochemically and confirmed by duplex-PCR from turkeys and broilers (30 strains from each bird species). Then, a flaA gene fragment (1725 bp) of C. jejuni isolates was amplified and amplicons were digested with HpyF3I enzyme. Restriction analysis by HpyF3I gave four different flaA patterns (H1, H2, H3, H4) among all tested C. jejuni isolates. In broiler isolates, all four patterns were observed but in turkey isolates, only H2 and H4 patterns were present. The results clearly demonstrated that distribution of the flaA typing patterns differed depending on the host species (broiler/turkey). H1 and H3 flaA types are more prevalent in broiler than turkey isolates, while H2 type is significantly more prevalent within isolates from turkey (p < 0.05). The flaA typing technique by digestion with HpyF3I enzyme can almost give us a clue to the source of infection in local outbreaks.



The authors gratefully acknowledge the staff of laboratory of microbiology, faculty of veterinary medicine, University of Semnan (Iran), especially Mrs. Behnaz Raeisian and Mrs. Birgani Farhani. This study was carried out in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a DVM student’s thesis (Elham Atefi Tabar). We deeply thank Dr. Masoumeh Estaji (Allameh Tabataba’i University) for English revision of the manuscript.

Funding information

We acknowledge Semnan University for funding the study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Adkin A, Hartnett E, Jordan L, Newell D, Davison H (2006) Use of a systematic review to assist the development of Campylobacter control strategies in broilers. J Appl Microbiol 100:306–315. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Amri A, Senok AC, Ismaeel AY, Al-Mahmeed AE, Botta GA (2007) Multiplex PCR for direct identification of Campylobacter spp. in human and chicken stools. J Med Microbiol 56:1350–1355. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alter T, Weber RM, Hamedy A, Glünder G (2011) Carry-over of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. between sequential and adjacent poultry flocks. Vet Microbiol 147:90–95. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ansari-Lari M, Hosseinzadeh S, Shekarforoush SS, Abdollahi M, Berizi E (2011) Prevalence and risk factors associated with Campylobacter infections in broiler flocks in Shiraz, southern Iran. Int J Food Microbiol 144:475–479. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behringer M, Miller WG, Oyarzabal OA (2011) Typing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from live broilers and retail broiler meat by flaA-RFLP, MLST, PFGE and REP-PCR. J Microbiol Methods 84:194–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrique-Mas JJ et al (2014) An epidemiological investigation of Campylobacter in pig and poultry farms in the Mekong delta of Vietnam. Epidemiol Infect 142:1425–1436. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eberle K, Kiess A (2012) Phenotypic and genotypic methods for typing Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in poultry. Poult Sci 91:255–264. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. El-Adawy H, Hotzel H, Tomaso H, Neubauer H, Taboada EN, Ehricht R, Hafez HM (2013) Detection of genetic diversity in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from a commercial turkey flock using flaA typing, MLST analysis and microarray assay. PLoS One 8:e51582. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ertaş HB, Çetinkaya B, Muz A, Öngör H (2004) Genotyping of broiler-originated Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates using fla typing and random amplified polymorphic DNA methods. Int J Food Microbiol 94:203–209.
  10. Fitzgerald C, Helsel LO, Nicholson MA, Olsen SJ, Swerdlow DL, Flahart R, Sexton J, Fields PI (2001) Evaluation of methods for subtyping Campylobacter jejuni during an outbreak involving a food handler. J Clin Microbiol 39:2386–2390. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fukuda H, Kojima F, Fujimoto S (2017) New identification of three or more Campylobacter species on the basis of a degenerate PCR–RFLP method targeting gyrB gene. Curr Microbiol 74:1160–1168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giombelli A, Gloria MBA (2014) Prevalence of Salmonella and Campylobacter on broiler chickens from farm to slaughter and efficiency of methods to remove visible fecal contamination. J Food Prot 77:1851–1859. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gürtler M, Alter T, Kasimir S, Fehlhaber K (2005) The importance of Campylobacter coli in human campylobacteriosis: prevalence and genetic characterization. Epidemiol Infect 133:1081–1087. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hajieh GS, Mohammad J, Ahad H, Tahmineh N, Ali S, Ebrahim R (2011) The prevalence of bacterial contamination of table eggs from retails markets by Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter jejuni and Escherichia coli in Shahrekord, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol 4(4):249–253Google Scholar
  15. Humphrey S, Chaloner G, Kemmett K, Davidson N, Williams N, Kipar A, Humphrey T, Wigley P (2014) Campylobacter jejuni is not merely a commensal in commercial broiler chickens and affects bird welfare. MBio 5:e01364–e01314. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jonker A, Picard J (2010) Antimicrobial susceptibility in thermophilic Campylobacter species isolated from pigs and chickens in South Africa. J S Afr Vet Assoc 81:228–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khoshbakht R, Tabatabaei M, Shirzad Aski H, Hosseinzadeh S (2014) Occurrence of virulence genes and strain diversity of thermophilic Campylobacters isolated from cattle and sheep faecal samples. Iran J Vet Res 15:138–144. Google Scholar
  18. Lajhar SA, Jennison A, Patel B, Duffy L (2015) Comparison of epidemiologically linked Campylobacter jejuni isolated from human and poultry sources. Epidemiol Infect 143:3498–3509. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lauwers S, Penner J (1984) Serotyping Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli on the basis of thermostable antigensGoogle Scholar
  20. Ma L, Wang Y, Shen J, Zhang Q, Wu C (2014) Tracking Campylobacter contamination along a broiler chicken production chain from the farm level to retail in China. Int J Food Microbiol 181:77–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meinersmann R, E Dingle K, Maiden M (2003) Genetic exchange among Campylobacter species. Genome Letters 2:48–52. Google Scholar
  22. Nachamkin I, Bohachick K, Patton C (1993) Flagellin gene typing of Campylobacter jejuni by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. J Clin Microbiol 31:1531–1536Google Scholar
  23. Oh J-Y, Kwon Y-K, Wei B, Jang H-K, Lim S-K, Kim C-H, Jung S-C, Kang M-S (2017) Epidemiological relationships of Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from humans and chickens in South Korea. J Microbiol 55:13–20. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Organization WH (2015) Investing to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases: third WHO report on neglected tropical diseases: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  25. Osmundson TW, Eyre CA, Hayden KM, Dhillon J, Garbelotto MM (2013) Back to basics: an evaluation of NaOH and alternative rapid DNA extraction protocols for DNA barcoding, genotyping, and disease diagnostics from fungal and oomycete samples. Mol Ecol Resour 13:66–74. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ozawa M, Hiki M, Kawanishi M, Abo H, Kojima A, Asai T, Hamamoto S (2016) Molecular typing of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni isolated from broilers in Japan using multilocus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Foodborne Pathog Dis 13:1–7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Patton CM, Wachsmuth I, Nachamkin I, Blaser M, Tompkins L (1992) Typing schemes: are current methods useful? American Society for Microbiology, WASHINGTON, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Pendleton S, Hanning I, Biswas D, Ricke S (2013) Evaluation of whole-genome sequencing as a genotyping tool for Campylobacter jejuni in comparison with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and flaA typing 1. Poult Sci 92:573–580. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petersen L, Newell D (2001) The ability of Fla-typing schemes to discriminate between strains of Campylobacter jejuni. J Appl Microbiol 91:217–224. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Platts-Mills JA, Kosek M (2014) Update on the burden of Campylobacter in developing countries. Curr Opin Infect Dis 27:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ragimbeau C, Schneider F, Losch S, Even J, Mossong J (2008) Multilocus sequence typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and fla short variable region typing of clonal complexes of Campylobacter jejuni strains of human, bovine, and poultry origins in Luxembourg. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:7715–7722. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rivera N et al (2011) Genotipificación y resistencia antibacteriana de cepas de Campylobacter spp aisladas en niños y en aves de corral. Rev Chil Infectol 28:555–562. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sandberg M, Sørensen L, Steenberg B, Chowdhury S, Ersbøll A, Alban L (2015) Risk factors for Campylobacter colonization in Danish broiler flocks, 2010 to 2011. Poult Sci 94:447–453. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sheppard SK, Maiden MC (2015) The evolution of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7:a018119. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Skarp C, Hänninen M-L, Rautelin H (2016) Campylobacteriosis: the role of poultry meat. Clin Microbiol Infect 22:103–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stabler RA, Larsson JT, Al-Jaberi S, Nielsen EM, Kay E, Tam CC, Higgins CD, Rodrigues LC, Richardson JF, O’brien SJ (2013) Characterization of water and wildlife strains as a subgroup of Campylobacter jejuni using DNA microarrays. Environ Microbiol 15:2371–2383. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Takahashi R, Shahada F, Chuma T, Okamoto K (2006) Analysis of Campylobacter spp. contamination in broilers from the farm to the final meat cuts by using restriction fragment length polymorphism of the polymerase chain reaction products. Int J Food Microbiol 110(3):240–245Google Scholar
  38. Torralbo A, Borge C, Allepuz A, García-Bocanegra I, Sheppard SK, Perea A, Carbonero A (2014) Prevalence and risk factors of Campylobacter infection in broiler flocks from southern Spain. Prev Vet Med 114:106–113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tresierra-Ayala A, Fernández H, Bendayán ME, Pereyra G, Bernuy A (1995) Aislamiento de especies termotolerantes de Campylobacter en dos poblaciones de pollos criados con y sin confinamiento. Rev Saude Publica 29:389–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vinueza-Burgos C, Wautier M, Martiny D, Cisneros M, Van Damme I, De Zutter L (2017) Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance and genetic diversity of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni in Ecuadorian broilers at slaughter age. Poult Sci 96:2366–2374. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wassenaar TM, Newell DG (2000) Genotyping of Campylobacter spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1–9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zbrun MV, Romero-Scharpen A, Olivero C, Rossler E, Soto LP, Rosmini MR, Sequeira GJ, Signorini ML, Frizzo LS (2013) Occurrence of thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. at different stages of the poultry meat supply chain in Argentina. New Zealand Vet J 61:337–343. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zendehbad B, Khayatzadeh J, Alipour A (2015) Prevalence, seasonality and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. isolates of retail broiler meat in Iran. Food Control 53:41–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zumbado-Gutiérrez L, Arévalo-Madrigal A, Donado-Godoy MP, Romero-Zúniga JJ (2014) Diagnóstico molecular de Campylobacter en la cadena avícola destinada para consumo humano en Costa Rica. Agronomía Mesoamericana 25(2):357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Veterinary MedicineSemnan UniversitySemnanIran
  2. 2.Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineSemnan UniversitySemnanIran
  3. 3.Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineSemnan UniversitySemnanIran

Personalised recommendations