Fibers and Polymers

, Volume 19, Issue 7, pp 1548–1555 | Cite as

Electroencephalogram and Psychological Response to Fragrance and Color of Citrus unshiu Scent-Infused Fabrics

  • Myungeun Lee
  • Chunjeong Kim
  • Badmaanyambuu Sarmandakh
  • Gilsoo ChoEmail author
  • Eunjou YiEmail author


This study examined compound sensibilities of fragrance and colors of the fabrics treated with microcapsules containing Citrus unshiu essential oil by electroencephalogram (EEG) responses and psychological evaluation. Cotton woven treated with 7 % (o.w.f.) of the microcapsules and 5 % (o.w.f.) of acrylic binder were used as specimens consisting of the combination of two fragrance intensities (low and high) and three color hues (white, greenish yellow, reddish purple). For EEG experimental, fourteen females participated in the measurement and their EEG responses were recorded before and during the exposure of stimulus. The findings showed that the beta wave was activated by Citrus unshiu-scented fabrics, and both of Citrus unshiu fragrance and color had significant effects of awakening the brain. Precisely, the beta wave was significantly reduced in the strong fragrance fabric with greenish yellow. For the psychological evaluation, thirty-five females including the panels for EEG evaluated with sensibility adjectives using labeled magnitude scale. The Citrus unshiu-scented fabrics were evaluated as natural and comfortable for their fragrance, but the fabric with greenish-yellow was evaluated as providing stronger and fresher fragrance and its beta wave was decreased remarkably. Therefore, Citurs unshiu scent-infused fabrics were felt more refreshing and reduced human’s stress when the fragrance was provided with a color that is reminiscent of the fragrance.


Citrus unshiu Color EEG Fragrance Microcapsule Psychological evaluation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. Shin, “Identification of Three New Flavonoids from the Peels of Citrus unshiu, Jin Pi”, MS Dissertation, Ewha Wonens Univ., Seoul, 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. R. Lee and E. Yi, Fiber. Polym., 14, 1295 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. R. Lee, B. Sarmandakh, and E. Yi, Text. Sci. Eng., 49, 181 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. R. Lee and E. Yi, Fiber. Polym., 14, 2088 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Noh, B. Sarmandakh, and E. Yi, Text. Sci. Eng., 53, 143 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. N. Gilbert, R. Martin, and S. E. Kemp, Am. J. Psych., 109, 335 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. J. Kim, Color Res. Applic., 38, 139 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Choi and Y. Park, J. Ko. Sci. Color Stud., 28, 27 (2014).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Fukumoto and H. Kuroda, Kansei Eng. Int. J., 11 (2012).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. L. Dematte, D. Sanabria, and C. Spence, Chem. Sense., 31, 531 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Woo and G. Cho, Sci. Emot. Sensibil., 6, 37 (2003).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. H. Kim, T. Y. Kim, G. Seo, S. H. Lee, and I. H. Chung, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text., 39, 529 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Kim, M. Jeon, H. Lee, J. Lee, S. Kim, J. Choi, Y. Seo, and S. Lee, “Trend Korea 2018”, pp.264–267, Miraebook Publishing Co., Seoul, 2017.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Lee, Proc. Ann. Conf. Korean Soc. Emotion & Sensibility, 1, 1 (1997).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. S. Lorig, K. B. Herman, G. E. Schwartz, and W. S. Cain, Bul. Psychonomic Soc., 28, 405 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. M. Shepherd, PLOS Biol., 2, e146 (2004).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. MB, “Olfactory Pathway, Hippocampal Formation, and the Amygdala. In: Core Text of Neuroanatomy”, 4th ed., pp.361–389, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1991.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Y. Cho, E. J. Yi, J. H. Shon, and G. S. Cho, Sci. Emot. Sensibil., 4, 79 (2001).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. M. Kim, S. Park, J. W. Hong, E. J. Jang, and C. H. Pak, Korean J. Hortic. Sci. Technol., 34, 472 (2016).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Yoto, T. Katsuura, K. Iwanaga, and Y. Shimomura, J. Physiol. Anthrop., 26, 373 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. K. Kim and H. W. Ryu, Sci. Emot. Sensibil., 14, 311 (2011).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. R. Lee, C. H. Han, and E. Yi, Fiber. Polym., 15, 35 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. G. Green, G. S. Shaffer, and M. M. Gilmore, Chem. Sens., 18, 683 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    B. G. Green, P. Dalton, B. Cowart, K. Rankin, and J. Higgins, Chem. Sens., 323 (1996).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Laparra-Hernández, J. M. Belda-Lois, E. Medina, N. Campos, and R. Poveda, J. Ind. Ergonomic., 39, 326 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    W. Klimesch, Brain Res. Rev., 29, 169 (1999).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. Hugdahl, “Psychophysiology: The Mind-body Perspective”, p.243, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    B. Sarmandakh and E. Yi, Text. Sci. Eng., 54, 1 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Fiber Society and Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clothing and TextilesYonsei UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Institute of Symbiotic Life-TECHYonsei UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.Department of Fashion and TextilesJeju National UniversityJejuKorea

Personalised recommendations