Volunteers’ perspective on online volunteering - a qualitative approach

  • Filipa Silva
  • Teresa Proença
  • Marisa R. FerreiraEmail author
Original Article


Since the creation of the Internet as an information technology, it has become a tool which exerts its influence on virtually all aspects of human life, including pro-social behavior (Amichai-Hamburger, 2008). An online context is a place of pro-social promise (Wright and Li 2012), and as Non-Profit Organizations (NPOs) face increasing challenges (such as resource scarcity) the Internet has become an important resource for involving and recruiting volunteers and creating opportunities for participation through online volunteering (Pinho and Macedo, 2006). Online volunteering is understood as a particular form of volunteering whose main distinction lies in procedure, since it occurs partially or totally on the Internet. This study seeks to understand the factors that cause and sustain online volunteerism from the volunteer’s perspective, namely the motivations that lead the individual to volunteer online, as well as the resulting experiences and consequences/benefits. We did twenty-four interviews with volunteers of several nationalities. The results contribute to the understanding and development of new knowledge about the online volunteering process, more precisely for a better understanding of how NPOs can best use this resource, namely in the management, recruiting and retaining of volunteers. The main conclusions show that altruistic motivations and learning/career rewards are the most common motivations. Regarding the intention for permanence, the satisfaction associated with the experience and the initial motivations are shown to be decisive. The consequences/benefits are essentially associated with the acquired learning which volunteers consider to be a valuable future asset, and the intrinsic reward of self-actualization and e-empowerment.


Internet Online volunteering Motivations Experiences Consequences 


  1. Ackermann, K., & Manatschal, A. (2018). Online volunteering as a means to overcome unequal participation? The profiles of online and offline volunteers compared. New Media and Society, 1–20.
  2. Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2008). Potential and promise of online volunteering. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 544–562. Scholar
  3. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Samuel-Azran, T. (2008). E-empowerment: Empowerment by the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1776–1789. Scholar
  4. Antoni, G. D. (2009). Motivations to volunteer and social capital: The role of intrinsic motivations in promoting networks of cooperative relation. Working Paper EconomEtica.Google Scholar
  5. Ballard, P. J., Malin, H., Porter, T. J., Colby, A., & Damon, W. (2015). Motivations for civic participation among diverse youth: More similarities than differences. Research in Human Development, 12(1–2), 63–83. Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1990). Reflections on Nonability Determinants of Competence. In Competence considered (pp. 315–362).Google Scholar
  7. Briggs, E., Peterson, M., & Gregory, G. (2010). Toward a better understanding of volunteering for nonprofit organizations: Explaining volunteers’ pro-social attitudes. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(1), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burns, D. J., Reid, J. S., & Anderson, C. (2006). Motivations to volunteer: The role of altruism. International Review on Public and NonProfit Marketing, 3(2), 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bussell, H., & Forbes, D. (2002). Understanding the volunteer market: The what, where, who and why of volunteering. International Journal of Nonprofit Volunteer Sector Marketing, 7(3), 244–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter, J., & Myers, C. K. (2007). Why volunteer? Evidence on the role of altruism, reputation, and incentives. Discussion Paper, 3021, 1–33.Google Scholar
  11. Castells, M. (2000). A Sociedade Em Rede - A Era da Informação (3rd ed.). Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
  12. Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1991). A functional analysis of volunteers’ motivations. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 119–148.Google Scholar
  13. Clary, E. G., Ridge, R. D., Stukas, A., Snyder, M., Copeland, J., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and Assessing the Motivations of Volunteers: A Functional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516–1530.Google Scholar
  14. Cox, J., Oh, E. Y., Simmons, B., Graham, G., Greenhill, A., Lintott, C., Masters, K., & Woodcock, J. (2018). Doing good online: The changing relationships between motivations, activity, and retention among online volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(5), 1031–1056. Scholar
  15. Cravens, J. (2000). Virtual volunteering: Online volunteers providing assistance to human service agencies. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 17(2–3), 119–136. Scholar
  16. Cravens, J. (2006). Involving international online volunteers: Factors for Success,Organizational benefits and new views of community. The International Journal of Volunteer Administration, XXIV(1), 15–23.Google Scholar
  17. Delicado, A. (2002). Caracterização do voluntariado em Portugal. Intervenção Social, 25/26(1), 127–140 Retrieved from Scholar
  18. Dhebar, B. B., & Stokes, B. (2008). A nonprofit manager’s guide to online volunteering. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(4), 497–506. Scholar
  19. Ferreira, M. R., Proença, T., & Proença, J. F. (2012). Motivation among hospital volunteers: An empirical analysis in Portugal. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 9(2), 137–152. Scholar
  20. Finkelstien, M. A. (2009). Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivational orientations and the volunteer process. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(5–6), 653–658. Scholar
  21. Gomes, R., & Knowles, P. A. (2001). Strategic internet and E-commerce applications for local nonprofit organizations. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 9(1–2), 215–245. Scholar
  22. Holdsworth, C. (2010). Why volunteer? Understanding motivations for student volunteering. British Journal of Educational Studies, 58(4), 421–437. Scholar
  23. Hossain, M., & Kauranen, I. (2015). Crowdsourcing: A comprehensive literature review. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 8(1), 2–22. Scholar
  24. Hustinx, L., Cnaan, R. a., & Handy, F. (2010). Navigating theories of volunteering: A hybrid map for a complex phenomenon. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40(4), 410–434. Scholar
  25. Ihm, J. (2017). Classifying and relating different types of online and offline volunteering. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(1), 400–419. Scholar
  26. Jaskyte, K. (2012). Exploring potential for information technology innovation in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(2), 118–127. Scholar
  27. Karr, L. B., Meijs, L. C. P. M., & Lerner, M. J. (2006). Sustaining the motivations to volunteer in organizations. In D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, B. Buunk, & S. Lindenberg (Eds.), Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior (pp. 157–172). Groningen - Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the Dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Reviews Psychology, 56, 485–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, Y., & Brudney, J. L. (2012). Participation in formal and informal volunteering: Implications for volunteer recruitment. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23(2), 159–180. Scholar
  30. Medina, R. D. (2011). Manual on the measurement of volunteer work. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  31. Meier, S., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Is Volunteering Rewarding in Itself? IZA Discussion Paper, 1045(0), 1–32.Google Scholar
  32. Moon, J. Y., & Sproull, L. S. (2008). The role of feedback in managing the internet-based volunteer work force. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 494–515. Scholar
  33. Mukherjee, D. (2010). An exploratory study of older adults’ engagement with virtual volunteerism. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 28(3), 188–196. Scholar
  34. Mukherjee, D. (2011). Participation of older adults in virtual volunteering: A qualitative analysis. Ageing International, 36(2), 253–266. Scholar
  35. Olson, D. L., & Rosacker, K. (2013). Crowdsourcing and open source software participation. Service Business, 7(4), 499–511. Scholar
  36. Omoto, A., & Snyder, M. (2002). Considerations of community: The context and process of volunteerism. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 846–867. Scholar
  37. Oomen, J., & Aroyo, L. (2011). Crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage domain. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies - C&T ‘11, (July), 138.
  38. Paço, A., & Agostinho, D. (2012). Does the kind of bond matter? The case of food bank volunteer. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 9(2), 105–118. Scholar
  39. Parboteeah, K. P., Cullenb, J. B., & Lim, L. (2004). Formal volunteering: A cross-National Test. Journal of World Business, 39, 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Penner, L. A. (2002). Dispositional and Organizacional influences on sustained volunteerism: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 447–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Penner, D., Piliavin, & Schroeder. (2005). Prosocial Behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pinho, J. C., & Macedo, I. M. (2006). The benefits and barriers associated with the use of the internet within the non-profit sector. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 16(1/2), 171–193. Scholar
  43. Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accountung & Management., 8, 238–264. Scholar
  44. Reuter, C., Heger, O., & Pipek, V. (2013). Combining Real and Virtual Volunteers through Social Media. In Proceedings of the Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM) (pp. 1–10).Google Scholar
  45. Rowley, J. (2012). Conducting research interviews. Management Research Review, 35(3/4), 260–271. Scholar
  46. Sampson, S. E. (2006). Optimization of volunteer labor assignments. Journal of Operations Management, 24(4), 363–377. Scholar
  47. Shye, S. (2011). The motivation to volunteer: A systemic quality of life theory. Social Indicators Research, 98(2), 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (2008). Volunteerism: Social issues perspectives and social policy implications. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2(1), 1–36. Scholar
  49. Sproull, L. (2011). Prosocial behavior on the net. Daedalus, 140(4), 140–153 Retrieved from Scholar
  50. Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2011). "Voluntweeters”: Self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis.Google Scholar
  51. Stiver, A., Barroca, L., Minocha, S., Richards, M., & Roberts, D. (2015). Civic crowdfunding research: Challenges, opportunities, and future agenda. New Media & Society, 17(2), 249–271. Scholar
  52. Stukas, A., Hoye, R., Nicholson, M., Brown, K. M., & Aisbett, L. (2016). Motivations to volunteer and their associations with volunteers’ well-being. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 112–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tuckman, H. P., Chatterjee, P., & Muha, D. (2004). Nonprofit websites: Prevalence, usage and commercial activity. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 12(1), 49–67. Scholar
  54. United Nations Volunteers. (2015). State of the world’s volunteerism report.Google Scholar
  55. Vázquez, J., Lanero, A., & Gutiérrez, P. (2015). Expressive and instrumental motivations explaining youth participation in non-profit voluntary associations : An application in Spain. International Review on Public and NonProfit Marketing, 12(3), 237–251. Scholar
  56. Walczuch, R., Van Braven, G., & Lundgren, H. (2000). Internet adoption barriers for small firms in the Netherlands. European Management Journal, 18(5), 561–572. Scholar
  57. Wang, C. C., & Wang, C. H. (2008). Helping others in online games: Prosocial behavior in cyberspac. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11(3), 344–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Waters, R. D. (2007). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the internet sites of the philanthropy 400. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(1), 59–76. Scholar
  59. Wright, M., & Li, Y. (2012). Prosocial behaviors in the cyber context. In Z. Yan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Cyber Behavior (Vol. 1). IGI Global.Google Scholar
  60. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Case study research design and methods.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of Porto, PortugalPortoPortugal
  2. 2.CEF.UP, Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of Porto, PortugalPortoPortugal
  3. 3.School of Management and Technology - Porto Polytechnic Institute, CIICESIFelgueirasPortugal

Personalised recommendations