Advertisement

Factors influencing successful net promoter score adoption by a nonprofit organization: a case study of the Boy Scouts of America

  • Thomas A. Burnham
  • Jeffrey A. Wong
Original Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

To better manage a far-flung, volunteer-dominated workforce, the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) incorporated a customer feedback metric, the Net Promoter Score (NPS), into its performance management measures in 2012. The customer feedback program collected, analyzed and disseminated NPS scores, loyalty driver question scores and text comments from seven constituency segments throughout the organization. The data and feedback, along with the ability to identify relationships between drivers and constituency NPS ratings, changed the focus of BSA executives and positively influenced organizational practices. However, many of the potential benefits of an NPS program were not realized. This case study identifies factors that facilitated and impeded the BSA’s achieving the full benefits of an NPS program and provides recommendations for nonprofits considering adopting a customer feedback performance metric.

Keywords

Performance measurement Net promoter score NPS Nonprofit management Customer feedback metric Case study Qualitative research 

References

  1. Aksoy, L., Cooil, B., Groening, C., Keiningham, T. L., & Yalçın, A. (2008). The Long-Term Stock Market Valuation of Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balabanis, G., Stables, R., & Phillips, H. (1997). Market Orientation in the Top 200 British Charity Organizations and its Impact on their Performance. European Journal of Marketing, 31(8), 583–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.Google Scholar
  4. NPS Benchmarks, 2016. Web. Dec. 19, 2016. <https://npsbenchmarks.com>.
  5. Boenigk, S., & Helmig, B. (2013). Why do donors donate?: Examining the effects of organizational identification and identity salience on the relationships among satisfaction, loyalty, and donation behavior. Journal of Service Research, 16(4), 533–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bohling, T., Bowman, D., Lavalle, S., Mittal, V., Narayandas, D., Ramani, G., & Varadarajan, R. (2006). CRM implementation: Effectiveness issues and insights. Journal of Service Research, 9(2), 184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, C., & Bozeman, B. (2013). Understanding public and nonprofit Managers' motivation through the Lens of self-determination theory. Public Management Review, 15(4), 584–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi, S. (2014). Learning orientation and market orientation as catalysts for innovation in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2), 393–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.Google Scholar
  10. de Haan, E., Verhoef, P. C., & Wiesel, T. (2015). The predictive ability of different customer feedback metrics for retention. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(2), 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duque-Zuluaga, L. C., & Schneider, U. (2008). Market orientation and organizational performance in the nonprofit context: Exploring both concepts and the relationship between them. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 19(2), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fredrickson, J. W. (1986). The strategic decision process and organizational structure. Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 280–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta, S., & Zeithaml, V. (2006). Customer metrics and their impact on financial performance. Marketing Science, 25(6), 718–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kamakura, W. A., Mittal, V., De Rosa, F., & Mazzon, J. A. (2002). Assessing the service-profit chain. Marketing Science, 21(3), 294–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaplan, R. S. (2001). Strategic performance measurement and Management in Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11(3), 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keiningham, T. L., Cooil, B., Andreassen, T. W., & Aksoy, L. (2007). A longitudinal examination of net promoter and firm revenue growth. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kendall, J., & Knapp, M. (2000). Measuring the performance of voluntary organizations. Public Management Review, 2(1), 105–132.Google Scholar
  22. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leipnitz, S. (2014). Stakeholder performance measurement in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 25(2), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu, G., Takeda, S., & Ko, W. (2014). Strategic orientation and social Enterprise performance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(3), 480–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahmoud, M., & Yusif, B. (2012). Market orientation, learning orientation, and the performance of nonprofit Organisations. International Journal of Producitivity and Performance Management, 61(6), 624–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Markey, R., Reichheld, F., & Dullweber, A. (2009). Closing the customer feedback loop. Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 43–47.Google Scholar
  27. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organisations: A synthesis of the research. New Jersey.Google Scholar
  28. Morgan, N. A., Anderson, E. W., & Mittal, V. (2005). Understanding Firms' customer satisfaction information usage. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pollack, B. L., & Alexandrov, A. (2013). Nomological validity of the net promoter index question. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(2), 118–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 46–54.Google Scholar
  31. Reichheld, F. F., & Markey, R. 2011. The Ultimate Question 2.0: How net promoter companies thrive in a customer-driven world: Harvard business press.Google Scholar
  32. Sawhill, J., & Williamson, D. (2001). Measuring what matters in nonprofits. McKinsey Quarterly, 2 98–107.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. N., & Wagner, J. (1999). A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 36(3), 356–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Williams, S. (2001). Drive your business forward with the balanced scorecard. Management Services, 45(6), 28–30.Google Scholar
  35. Wood, V., Bhuian, S., & Kiecker, P. (2000). Market orientation and organizational performance in not-for-profit hospitals. Journal of Business Research, 48, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zimmermann, J. A. M., & Stevens, B. W. (2006). The use of performance measurement in South Carolina nonprofits. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 16(3), 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NevadaNevadaUSA

Personalised recommendations