Use of Validity Indicators on the Personality Assessment Inventory to Detect Feigning of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
This study examined the ability of several Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) validity indicators to detect feigning of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Participants included 491 individuals recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTURK): 44 participants were asked to feign PTSD, 25 participants carried a diagnosis of PTSD and demonstrated at least moderate levels of current symptom, and 422 served as control subjects. Results indicated that all of the PAI negative distortion validity indicators significantly distinguished the true PTSD from the feigned PTSD group. The indicators with the largest effect sizes were the Hong Malingering Function and the Multiscale Feigning Index, both of which demonstrated moderate sensitivity to feigned PTSD with specificity above 90%.
KeywordsMalingering Feigning Personality assessment inventory Post-traumatic stress disorder
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Leslie Morey is the author of the Personality Assessment Inventory and receives royalties from its sale. Duncan Russell declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- Bowen, C., & Bryant, R. A. (2006). Malingering posttraumatic stress on the Personality Assessment Inventory. International Journal of Forensic Psychology, 1, 22–28.Google Scholar
- Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for Administration and Scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Drury, P., Calhoun, P. S., Boggs, C., Araujo, G., Dennis, M. F., & Beckham, J. C. (2009). Influences of comorbid disorders on Personality Assessment Inventory profiles in women with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fairbank, J. A., McCaffrey, R. J., & Keane, T. M. (1985). Psychometric detection of fabricated symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 142(4), 501–503. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.142.4.501.
- Hong, S. H., & Kim, Y. H. (2001). Detection of random response and impression management in the PAI: II. Detection indices. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, 751–761.Google Scholar
- Lees-Haley, P., & Dunn, J. T. (1994). The ability of naive subjects to report symptoms of mild brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, major depression, and generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50(2), 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199403)50:2<252:AID-JCLP2270500217>3.0.CO;2-T.
- McCredie, M. N., & Morey, L. C. (2018). Who are the Turkers? A characterization of MTurk workers using the Personality Assessment Inventory. Assessment, 1073191118760709.Google Scholar
- McDevitt-Murphy, M., Weathers, F. W., Flood, A. M., Eakin, D. E., & Benson, T. A. (2007). The utility of the PAI and the MMPI-2 for discriminating PTSD, depression, and social phobia in trauma-exposed college students. Assessment, 14(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106295914.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morey, L. C. (1991). The Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Morey, L. C. (1996). An interpretive guide to the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Morey, L. C. (2003). Essentials of PAI assessment. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Mozley, S. L., Miller, M. W., Weathers, F. W., Beckham, J. C., & Feldman, M. E. (2005). Personality assessment inventory (PAI) profiles of male veterans with combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27(3), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-005-0634-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scragg, P., Robert, B., & Mendham, M.-C. (2000). Feigning post-traumatic stress disorder on the PAI. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 7(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(200005)7:2<155:AID-CPP237>3.0.CO;2-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar