Advertisement

Psychological Injury and Law

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 370–376 | Cite as

Why “Trauma-Related Dissociation” Is a Misnomer in Courts: a Critical Analysis of Brand et al. (2017a, b)

  • Harald Merckelbach
  • Lawrence Patihis
Article

Abstract

Forensic psychologists are sometimes faced with the task of educating triers of fact about the evidential weight of dissociative experiences reported by claimants in litigation procedures. In their two-part essay, Brand et al. (Psychological Injury and Law, 10, 283–297, 2017a; Psychological Injury and Law, 10, 298–312, 2017b) provide advice to experts who find themselves in such situation. We argue that the Brand et al. approach is problematic and might induce confirmation bias in experts. Their approach is not well connected to the extant literature on recovered memories, dissociative amnesia, memory distortions, and symptom validity testing. In some instances, Brand et al. (Psychological Injury and Law, 10, 283–297, 2017a; Psychological Injury and Law, 10, 298–312, 2017b) simplify the current body of knowledge about dissociation; in other instances, they ignore relevant empirical studies to an extent that is worrisome.

Keywords

Dissociative symptoms Symptom validity Biases Expert witness testimony 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

No informed consent was needed for this commentary.

Animal Rights

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this commentary.

References

  1. Bass, E., & Davis, L. (1988). The courage to heal. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  2. Bourget, D., Gagne, P., & Wood, S. F. (2017). Dissociation: defining the concept in criminal forensic psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 45, 147–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brand, B. L., Schielke, H. J., & Brams, J. S. (2017a). Assisting the courts in understanding and connecting with experiences of disconnection: addressing trauma-related dissociation as a forensic psychologist, part I. Psychological Injury and Law, 10, 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brand, B. L., Schielke, H. J., Brams, J. S., & DiComo, R. A. (2017b). Assessing trauma-related dissociation in forensic contexts: addressing trauma-related dissociation as a forensic psychologist, part II. Psychological Injury and Law, 10, 298–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brand, B. L., Vissia, E. M., Chalavi, S., Nijenhuis, E. R. S., Webermann, A. R., Draijer, N., & Reinders, A. A. T. S. (2016). DID is trauma based: further evidence supporting the trauma model of DID. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 134, 560–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Briere, J., & Runtz, M. (2015). Dissociation in individuals denying trauma exposure: findings from two samples. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 203, 439–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cima, M., Merckelbach, H., Hollnack, S., & Knauer, E. (2003). Characteristics of psychiatric prison inmates who claim amnesia. Personality & Individual Differences, 35, 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dalenberg, C. J., Brand, B. L., Gleaves, D. H., Dorahy, M. J., Loewenstein, R. J., Cardeña, E., Frewen, P. A., Carlson, E. B., & Spiegel, D. (2012). Evaluation of the evidence for the trauma and fantasy models of dissociation. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 550–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dorahy, M. J., & Huntjens, R. J. C. (2007). Memory and attentional processes in dissociative identity disorder: A review of the empirical literature. In E. Vermetten, M. Dorahy, & D. Spiegel (Eds.), Traumatic dissociation: Neurobiology and treatment (pp. 55–75). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Dror, I. E., & Murrie, D. C. (2018). A hierarchy of expert performance applied to forensic psychological assessments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duffy, C. (2000). Prevalence of undiagnosed dissociative disorders in an inpatient setting [Doctoral dissertation]. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT No. 3041898).Google Scholar
  12. Engelhard, I. M., & McNally, R. J. (2015). Metacognitive appraisal of memory inconsistency for traumatic events in Dutch veterans. Memory, 23, 972–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engelhard, I. M., van den Hout, M. A., & McNally, R. J. (2008). Memory consistency for traumatic events in Dutch soldiers deployed to Iraq. Memory, 16, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farrell, H. M. (2011). Dissociative identity disorder: medicolegal challenges. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39, 402–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Grove, W. M., & Barden, R. C. (1999). Protecting the integrity of the legal system: the admissibility of testimony from mental health experts under Daubert/Kumho analyses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 224–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huntjens, R. J., Verschuere, B., & McNally, R. J. (2012). Inter-identity autobiographical amnesia in patients with dissociative identity disorder. PLoS One, 7(7), e40580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iverson, G. L. (1995). Qualitative aspects of malingered memory deficits. Brain Injury, 9, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson, G. (2000). The scientist and the scales of justice. Science & Justice, 40, 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jenkins, K. G., Kapur, N., & Kopelman, M. D. (2009). Retrograde amnesia and malingering. Current Opinion in Neurology, 22, 601–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kilpatrick, D. G., Resnick, H. S., Milanak, M. E., Miller, M. W., Keyes, K. M., & Friedman, M. J. (2013). National estimates of exposure to traumatic events and PTSD prevalence using DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26, 537–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kunst, M. J. J., & Winkel, F. W. (2015). PTSD symptom reporting and persistent malingering in recipients of state compensation for violent crime victimization: an exploratory study. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 26, 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Larsen, S. E., Pacella, M. L., Garfin, D., Mota, N. P., Hunt, J., & deRoon-Cassini, T. A. (2017). Inconsistencies in the reporting of perceived trauma severity among acute physical injury survivors. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26, 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leger, D., & Poursain, B. (2005). An international survey of insomnia: under-recognition and under-treatment of a polysymptomatic condition. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 21, 1785–1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lilienfeld, S. O., & Landfield, K. (2008). Science and pseudoscience in law enforcement: a user-friendly primer. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1215–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loftus, E. F. (1993). The Reality of Repressed Memories. American Psychologist, 48, 518–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loftus, E. F., & Pickrell, J. E. (1995). The formation of false memories. Psychiatric Annals, 25, 720–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lynn, S. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Merckelbach, H., Giesbrecht, T., McNally, R., Loftus, E., … Malaktaris, A. (2014). The trauma model of dissociation: Inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions: Comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012). Psychological Bulletin, 140, 896–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lynn, S. J., Lock, T. G., Myers, B., & Payne, D. G. (1997). Recalling the unrecallable: should hypnosis be used to recover memories in psychotherapy? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maran, M. (2010). My lie: a true story of false memory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Marcopulos, B. A., Hedjar, L., & Arredondo, B. C. (2016). Dissociative amnesia or malingered amnesia? A case report. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 16, 106–117.Google Scholar
  31. Mazzoni, G. A., Loftus, E. F., Seitz, A., & Lynn, S. J. (1999). Changing beliefs and memories through dream interpretation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McNally, R. J. (2005). Debunking myths about trauma and memory. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 817–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McSherry, B. (2004). Criminal responsibility, “fleeting” states of mental impairment, and the power of self-control. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27, 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Merckelbach, H. (2004). Telling a good story: Fantasy proneness and the quality of fabricating memories. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1371–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Merckelbach, H., Boskovic, I., Pesy, D., Dalsklev, M., & Lynn, S. J. (2017). Symptom overreporting and dissociative experiences: a qualitative review. Consciousness and Cognition, 49, 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Merckelbach, H., Giesbrecht, T., van Heugten-van der Kloet, D., Jong, J. D., Meyer, T., & Rietman, K. (2015). The overlap between dissociative symptoms and symptom over-reporting. European Journal of Psychiatry, 29, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 1094–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murrie, D. C., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2015). Adversarial allegiance among expert witnesses. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11, 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neal, T., & Grisso, T. (2014). The cognitive underpinnings of bias in forensic mental health evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 200–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ost, J. (2017). Adults’ retractions of childhood sexual abuse allegations: high-stakes and the (in) validation of recollection. Memory, 25, 900–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patihis, L., & Lynn, S. J. (2017). Psychometric comparison of dissociative experiences scales II and C: a weak trauma-dissociation link. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 392–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Patihis, L., & Pendergrast, M. H. (2018). Reports of recovered memories of abuse in therapy in a large age-representative U.S. national sample: therapy type and decade comparisons. Clinical Psychological Science.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618773315.
  43. Peace, K. A., & Masliuk, K. A. (2011). Do motivations for malingering matter? Symptoms of malingered PTSD as a function of motivation and trauma type. Psychological Injury and Law, 4, 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pendergrast, M. (1996). Victims of memory: Incest accusations and shattered lives (2nd ed.). Hinesburg: Upper Access, Inc.Google Scholar
  45. Pendergrast, M. (2017). The repressed memory epidemic: how it happened and what we need to learn from it. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piper, A., & Merskey, H. (2004). The persistence of folly: a critical examination of dissociative identity disorder. Part I. The excesses of an improbable concept. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 592–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pope, H. G., Poliakoff, M. B., Parker, M. P., Boynes, M., & Hudson, J. I. (2007). Is dissociative amnesia a culture-bound syndrome? Findings from a survey of historical literature. Psychological Medicine, 37, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rettew, D. C., Lynch, A. D., Achenbach, T. M., Dumenci, L., & Ivanova, M. Y. (2009). Meta-analyses of agreement between diagnoses made from clinical evaluations and standardized diagnostic interviews. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 18, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Richards, P. M., Geiger, J. A., & Tussey, C. M. (2015). The dirty dozen: 12 sources of bias in forensic neuropsychology with ways to mitigate. Psychological Injury and Law, 8, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Risinger, D. M., Saks, M. J., Thompson, W. C., & Rosenthal, R. (2002). The Daubert/Kumho implications of observer effects in forensic science: hidden problems of expectation and suggestion. California Law Review, 90, 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sar, V., Akyüz, G., & Dogan, O. (2007). Prevalence of dissociative disorders among women in the general population. Psychiatry Research, 149, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schelleman-Offermans, K., & Merckelbach, H. (2010). Fantasy proneness as a confounder of verbal lie detection tools. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schrag, A., Brown, R. J., & Trimble, M. R. (2004). Reliability of self-reported diagnoses in patients with neurologically unexplained symptoms. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 75, 608–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tan, J. E., Slick, D. J., Strauss, E., & Hultsch, D. F. (2002). How’d they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thomas, A. K., & Loftus, E. F. (2002). Creating bizarre false memories through imagination. Memory & Cognition, 30, 423–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tysse, J. E. (2005). Note: The right to an imperfect trial: amnesia, malingering, and competency to stand trial. William Mitchell Law Review, 32, 353–387.Google Scholar
  57. Van der Kloet, D., Merckelbach, H., Giesbrecht, T., & Lynn, S. J. (2012). Fragmented sleep, fragmented mind: the role of sleep in dissociative symptoms. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B., Serpa, J. G., Buehler, J., & Ziegler, E. A. (2009). Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Woody, R. H. (2016). Psychological testimony and the Daubert standard. Psychological Injury and Law, 9, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Young, G. (2015). Malingering in forensic disability-related assessments: prevalence 15±15%. Psychological Injury and Law, 8, 188–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Young, G. (2016). Psychiatric/psychological forensic report writing. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 49, 214–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zago, S., Sartoir, G., & Scarlato, G. (2004). Malingering and retrograde amnesia: the historic case of the Collegno amnesic. Cortex, 40, 519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forensic Psychology Section, Faculty of Psychology and NeuroscienceMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA

Personalised recommendations