Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 33, Issue 11, pp 5219–5226 | Cite as

3D printed polycarbonate reinforced acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene composites: Composition effects on mechanical properties, micro-structure and void formation study

  • Mnvrl Kumar
  • R. RamakrishnanEmail author
  • Alnura Omarbekova
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

3D printing is one of the most popular additive manufacturing technique due to its usage in vast applications. The process of 3D printed polycarbonate (PC) reinforced acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) composite increases the mechanical properties and yields higher strength for 3D printed structures/products. In this paper, a comparative study was conducted on PC/ABS polymer composites developed using fused deposition modeling (FDM) and conventional compression molding (CM). The proposed study aims at analyzing 3D printed PC/ABS in terms of their processibility, microstructure, and mechanical performance. Three different specimens were prepared with weight percentages (10 wt%, 20 wt%, and 30 wt%) of PC reinforcement in ABS. Mechanical properties of the specimens are used to find the best composition of the composite using FDM and CM. Similarly, the microstructure of specimens is studied to identify the variations in the strength of the polymer composites. This study proves the compatibility of the two polymers. With an increase in the PC content in the sample, the hardness and strength are improved and can provide an excellent amount of strength to the product at a required concentration of PC reinforcement. This phenomenon was explained based on changes in the void formation using micro-structural study. Knowing the appropriate polymer composition, it contributes to printing complex 3D printed with better rational, aesthetic and economic benefits for different applications such as automotive, marine, and several other fields.

Keywords

3D printing Polycarbonate Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene Micro-structure Mechanical properties Void formation 

Nomenclature

R*

Radius

Wt%

Weight percentage

t**

Thickness

°C

Degree celsius

mm

Millimeters

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. [1]
    D. K. F. Van, Y. Koga, A. Todoroki, M. Ueda, Y. Hirano and R. Matsuzaki, 3D printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermo-plastic (CFRTP) tensile test specimens, Open J. of Composite Materials, 6 (1) (2016) 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Olsson, M. S. Hellsing and A. R. Rennie, New possibilities using additive manufacturing with materials that are difficult to process and with complex structures, Physica Scripta, 92 (2017) 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    O. A. Mohamed, S. H. Masood and J. L. Bhowmik, Characterization and dynamic mechanical analysis of PC-ABS material processed by fused deposition modelling: An investigation through I-optimal response surface methodology, Measurement, 107 (2017) 128–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    H. L. Tekinalp, V. Kunc, G. M. Velez-Garcia, C. E. Duty, L. J. Love, A. K. Naskar, C. A. Blue and S. Ozcan, Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing, Composites Science and Technology, 105 (2014) 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    O. A. Mohamed, S. H. Masood and J. L. Bhowmik, Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: A review of current research and future prospects, Advances in Manufacturing, 3 (2015) 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    X. Tian, T. Liu, C. Yang, Q. Wang and D. Li, Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 88 (2016) 198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. A. Inzana, D. Olvera, S. M. Fuller, J. P. Kelly, O. A. Graeve, E. M. Schwarz and H. A. Awad, 3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration, Biomaterials, 35 (2014) 4026–4034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Christ, M. Schnabel, E. Vorndran, J. Groll and U. Gbureck, Fiber reinforcement during 3D printing, Materials Letters, 139 (2015) 165–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    F. Ning, W. Cong, J. Qiu, J. Wei and S. Wang, Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling, Composites Part B: Engineering, 80 (2015) 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    V. Kovan, G. Altan and E. S. Topal, Effect of layer thickness and print orientation on strength of 3D printed and adhesively bonded single lap joints, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31 (2017) 2197–2201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    H. Li, J. Guiping, F. Qinzhi and W. Tiejun, Experimental investigation on the essential work of mixed-mode fracture of PC/ABS alloy, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29 (2015) 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. E. Lim, N. H. Kim, H.-J. Choi and K. Park, Design for additive manufacturing of customized cast with porous shell structures, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31 (2017) 5477–5483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Chapiro, Current achievements and future outlook for composites in 3D printing, J. of Reinforced Plastics, 60 (2016) 372–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Nikzad, S. H. Masood and I. Sbarski, Thermo-mechanical properties of highly filled polymeric composites for fused deposition modeling, J. of Materials and Design, 32 (2011) 3448–3456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. S. Scholz, J. P. Blanchfield, L. D. Bloom, B. H. Coburn, M. Elkington, J. D. Fuller and J. A. Trevarthen, The use of composite materials in modern orthopedic medicine and prosthetic devices: A review, Composites Science and Technology, 71 (2011) 1791–1803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    D. A. Türk, F. Brenni, M. Zogg and M. Meboldt, Mechanical characterization of 3D printed polymers for fiber reinforced polymers processing, Materials and Design, 118 (2017) 256–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    W. Y. Chiang and Y. S. Chiang, Effect of titanate coupling agent on electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness and mechanical properties of PC–ABS–NCF composite, J. of Applied Polymer Science, 46 (1992) 673–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    V. Petrovic, J. V. H. Gonzalez, O. Jordá Ferrando, J. Delgado Gordillo, J. R. B. Puchades and L. Portolés Griñan, Additive layered manufacturing: Sectors of industrial application shown through case studies, Int. J. of Production Research, 49 (2011) 1061–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Z. Y. Tan, X. F. Xu, S. L. Sun, C. Zhou, Y. H. Ao, H. X. Zhang and Y. Han, Influence of rubber content in ABS in wide range on the mechanical properties and morphology of PC/ABS blends with different composition, Polymer Engineering and Science, 46 (2006) 1476–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    V. Francis and P. K. Jain, A filament modification approach for in situ ABS/OMMT nanocomposite development in extrusion-based 3D printing, Journal of Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 40 (7) (2018) 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    M. Domingo-Espin, J. M. Puigoriol-Forcada, A. A. Garcia-Granada, J. Lluma, S. Borros and G. Reyes, Mechanical property characterization and simulation of fused deposition modeling polycarbonate parts, Materials and Design, 83 (2015) 670–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    R. Greco, M. F. Astarita, L. Dong and A. Sorrentino, Poly-carbonate/ABS blends: Processability, thermal properties, and mechanical and impact behavior, Advances in Polymer Technology, 13 (1994) 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    R. Kumar, R. Singh and I. P. S. Ahuja, Melt processing for enhancing compatibility of aluminum-reinforced acryloni-trile–butadiene–styrene and polyamide 6 for friction welding applications, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 40 (8) (2018) 378–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    M. Ahmad, N. Hayat and F. H. Shah, Rapid development of complex shaped customized products, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 37 (1) (2015) 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    ASTM D638, ASTM Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics, D638-03, West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International (2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© KSME & Springer 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mnvrl Kumar
    • 1
  • R. Ramakrishnan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alnura Omarbekova
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Design and Automation, School of Mechanical EngineeringVellore Institute of Technology (VIT)VelloreIndia
  2. 2.Institut de Recherche en Génie Civil et MécaniqueEcole Centale de NantesNantesFrance

Personalised recommendations