Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 33, Issue 9, pp 4511–4519 | Cite as

Numerical investigation of plume dispersion characteristics for various ambient flow velocities

  • Selvakumar Kumaresh
  • Man Young KimEmail author
  • Chongmin Kim
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Floating LNG bunkering offshore terminal (FLBT) has been adopted as a floating unit by the marine industry equipped with the natural gas liquefaction plant on the ship’s deck with the practical interest in controlling the plume emission discharged from the ship. The downwash of emitted plumes has adverse consequences on the ship’s engine intake and ventilation system followed by the interference of the smoke with helicopter operations. Owing to this fact, understanding of the plume behavior is considered to be so significant in the aspect of ship design and thereby, flow visualization techniques assist to study the plume path ensuring the safety of the personnel and functioning system. The unignited flare gas emitted from the tower invites heat transfer due to the temperature difference between the atmospheric wind and the ship’s exhaust, which follows the examination of mixing enhancement of fluid mediums as well as the mitigation of plume concentration depending upon wind speeds. The parametric study is intended to investigate the plume dispersion pattern around a ship based on the flare motion and bending angle for light and strong wind speeds. It is observed that the plume gas rises higher and disperses over the larger area with wider streamline separation due to the effect of buoyancy for light wind speeds. On the other hand, the motion of flare gas is found to be narrow for strong winds restricting vertical movements due to dominant inertial forces than gravity pull. Thus, the current numerical investigation facilitates in understanding the configuration and plume distribution by the variation in streamline behavior with contours plots. In this work, the calculated results are analyzed systematically in pretty realistic conditions and simple measures are obtained, which will be applied to the preliminary design of plume stack depending on the ship’s deck arrangement.

Keywords

Liquefaction plant Offshore terminal Plume dispersion Unignited flare gas 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the WC300 R&D project (S2307213) and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (No. NRF-2018R1D1A1 B070 48355).

References

  1. [1]
    E. Dobrucali, A brief review on examination of exhaust gas dispersion on marine ships, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8 (2) (2012) 46–56.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. A. Suardin, A. J. McPhate Jr, A. Sipkema, M. Childs and M. S. Mannan, Fire and explosion assessment on oil and gas floating production storage offloading (FPSO): An effective screening and comparison tool, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 87 (2009) 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. K. Paik, J. Czujko, B. J. Kim, J. K. Seo, H. S. Ryu, Y. C. Ha, P. Janiszewski and B. Musial, Quantitative assessment of hydrocarbon explosion and fire risks in offshore installations, Marine Structures, 24 (2011) 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Dana, C. J. Lee, J. Park, D. Shin and E. S. Yoon, Quantitative risk analysis of fire and explosion on the top-side LNG-liquefaction process of LNG-FPSO, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92 (2014) 430–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    K. H. Sung, J. W. Bang, L. Li, J. Choi, D. Kim, H. S. Ryou, K. B. Yoon and S. H. Lee, Effect of crack size on gas leakage characteristics in a confined space, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 30 (7) (2016) 3411–3419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    L. Li, J. Choi, J. Bang, S. Lee, S. H. Lee and D. Kim, Numerical investigation of LNG gas dispersion in a confined space: An engineering model, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31 (9) (2017) 4533–4540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. M. Tauseef, D. Rashtchian and S. A. Abbasi, CFD-based simulation of dense gas dispersion in presence of obstacles, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24 (2011) 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    B. R. Cormier, R. Qi, G. Yun, Y. Zhang and M. S. Mannan, Application of computational fluid dynamics for LNG vapor dispersion modeling: A study of key parameters, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22 (2009) 332–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Riddle, D. Carruthers, A. Sharpe, C. McHugh and J. Stocker, Comparisons between FLUENT and ADMS for atmospheric dispersion modelling, Atmospheric Environment, 38 (2004) 1029–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    K. D. Singh, P. Gangadharan, D. H. Chen, H. H. Lou, X. Li and P. Richmond, Computational fluid dynamics modeling of laboratory flames and an industrial flare, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 64 (11) (2014) 1328–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    H. K. Kang, An examination on the dispersion characteristics of boil-off gas in vent mast exit of membrane type LNG carriers, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, 19 (2) (2013) 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. K. Wee and I. S. Park, Plume dispersion characteristics in various ambient air temperature gradient conditions, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A, 56 (2009) 807–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. Ohba, A. Kouchi, T. Hara, V. Vieillard and D. Nedelka, Validation of heavy and light gas dispersion models for the safety analysis of LNG tank, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 17 (2004) 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    R. Sklavounos and F. Rigas, Validation of turbulence models in heavy gas dispersion over obstacles, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 108 (2004) 09–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Y. K. Park and S. C. Wu, Two-dimension numerical simulation of stack flue gas dispersion, Journal of Korean Oil Chemists’ Soc., 29 (1) (2012) 33–39.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    S. M. A. A. Hasnine, M. H. Rahman and A. K. M. Sadrul Islam, Numerical modeling of wind effect on plume dispersion from a point source around buildings, Proceedings of the 13th Asian Congress of Fluid Mechanics (2010).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    K. Ashrafi, M. Shafiepour and H. Abbaszadeh, Numerical simulation of plume rise in neutral atmospheric stability condition, Journal of Environmental Studies, 40 (1) (2014) 237–246.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    A. Guenther and B. Lamb, Three-dimensional numerical simulation of plume downwash with a k - ε turbulence model, Journal of Applied Metrology, 292 (7) (1990) 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    O. Măruntălu, G. Lăzăroiu, E. E. Manea, D. A. Bondrea and L. D. Robescu, Numerical simulation of the air pollutants dispersion emitted by CHP using ANSYS CFX, International Journal of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, 9 (9) (2015) 1058–1064.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    C. Kim and B. C. Choi, Dispersion analysis of the unignited flare gas in an LNG-FPSO vessel, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Engineering, 41 (8) (2017) 753–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    ANSYS Inc., Help documentation ‘ANSYS 17.0’ software.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    The Swiss Wind Power Data Website, https://wind-data.ch/tools/profile.php?lng=en.
  23. [23]
    O. Zavila, Physical modeling of gas pollutant motion in the atmosphere, Advances in Modeling of Fluid Dynamics, INTECH (2017) Chapter 3.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    P. Gousseau, B. Blocken, T. Stathopoulos and G. J. F. van Heijst, CFD simulation of near-field pollutant dispersion on a high-resolution grid: A case study by LES and RANS for a building group in downtown Montreal, Atmospheric Environment, 45 (2) (2011) 428–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    T. Ming, C. Peng, T. Gong and Z. Li, Heat transfer and pollutant dispersion in street canyons, Pollutant Dispersion in Built Environment (2017) 17–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    I. R. Ilaboya, E. Atikpo, L. Umukoro, F. E. Omofuma and M. O. Ezugwu, Analysis of the effects of mixing height & other associated factors on the effective dispersion of plume, Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment, 2 (2) (2011) 153–160.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    C. D. Cooper and F. C. Alley, Air Pollution Control - A Design Approach, 3rd Edition, Waveland Press, Inc. (2002).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    R. K. Velamati, M. Vivek, K. Goutham, G R. Sreekanth, S. Dharmarajan and M. Goel, Numerical study of a buoyant plume from a multi-flue stack into a variable temperature gradient atmosphere, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22 (21) (2015) 16814–16829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KSME & Springer 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Selvakumar Kumaresh
    • 1
  • Man Young Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chongmin Kim
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringChonbuk National UniversityChonbukKorea
  2. 2.R&D Center, Technical DivisionKorean RegisterBusanKorea

Personalised recommendations