Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 315–322 | Cite as

Morphing technology for generating intermediate roughing models in multi-axis machining for complex parts

  • Feiyan HanEmail author
  • Juan Wei
  • Chuanwei Zhang
  • Xianlong Peng
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

In multi-axis milling of the aviation complex parts, establishing accurate machining process model is a key technology to realize intelligent processing. In order to obtain accurate machining process model of the aviation complex parts, a method based on morphing technology to construct intermediate process models of multi-axis roughing is proposed. Firstly, the theoretical basis for morphing technology is introduced, and the mathematical model of three hermite transfinite interpolation for morphing technology is established. Then the process constraint which impacts the geometry of the intermediate process model is analyzed in morphing technology. According to the analysis of the process constraint to design the process parameters, and the process parameters with constraints are introduced to the morphing technology to construct the process models. Finally, a validation is conducted on a complex aviation parts. The example shows that the method can able to construct the intermediate process models of complex structure parts for multi-axis rough machining under the condition of controlling the machining allowance, and also can shorten the total processing time of the complex parts, to a certain extent, the processing efficiency is improved.

Keywords

Complex parts Muti-axis machining Morphing technology Transfinite interpolation Intermediate process model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. P. Duncan and S. G. Mair, Sculptured surfaces in engineering and medicine, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1983).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    R. T. Farouki, The approximation of non-degenerate offset surfaces, Computer Aided Geometric Design, 3 (1) (1986) 15–43.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    L. X. Cao, H. Gong and J. Liu, Research on contact problem of surfaces and contact characteristics of offset surfaces, Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 47 (1) (2007) 39.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. A. Piegl and W. Tiller, Computing offsets of NURBS curves and surfaces, Computer-Aided Design, 31 (2) (1999) 147–156.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    T. Saito and T. Takahashi, NC machining with G-buffer method, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 25 (4) (1991) 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    B. K. Choi, D. H. Kim and R. B. Jerard, C-space approach to tool-path generation for die and mould machining, Computer-Aided Design, 29 (9) (1997) 657–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    B. K. Choi and R. B. Jerard, Sculptured surface machining: Theory and applications, Springer Science & Business Media (2012).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Chen, G. R. Yan, Y. Q. Chen and X. X. Zhu, The intelligent machining based on stock-remaining model, Computer Aided Engineering, 9 (3) (2000) 25–32.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Douglas and J. Gallier, Topological evolution of surfaces, Graphics Interface, 96 (1996) 194–203.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    F. Lazarus and A. Verroust, Three-dimensional metamorphosis: A survey, The Visual Computer, 14 (8) (1998) 373–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    P. P. Lefebvre and B. Lauwers, 3D morphing for generating intermediate roughing levels in multi-axis machining, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 2 (1–4) (2005) 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. R. Han, New unified machining process planning using morphing technology, University of California, Los Angeles (2011).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. R. Han and D. C. Yang, Volume interior parameterization for automated unified machining process of freeform surfaces, Frontiers in Computer Education, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012) 577–584.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    B. Huang, A unified approach for integrated computer-aided design and manufacturing, University of California, Los Angeles (2013).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    T. Lin, J. W. Lee and E. L. Bohez, A new accurate curvature matching and optimal tool based five-axis machining algorithm, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 23 (10) (2009) 2624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Can and A. Ünüvar, A novel iso-scallop tool-path generation for efficient five-axis machining of free-form surfaces, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 51 (9–12) (2010) 1083–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. Can and A. Ünüvar, Five-axis tool path generation for 3D curves created by projection on B-spline surfaces, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 49 (9–12) (2010) 1047–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    J. N. Lee, Tool path generation method for multi-axis machining of helical milling cutter with specific cross-section profile, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 21 (10) (2007) 1644–1650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    H. Jeon, J. Lee and J. Yang, A touch-probe path generation method through similarity analysis between the feature vectors in new and old models, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 30 (10) (2016) 4705–4716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Feiyan Han
    • 1
    Email author
  • Juan Wei
    • 1
  • Chuanwei Zhang
    • 1
  • Xianlong Peng
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Mechanical EngineeringXi’an University of Science and Technology710054China

Personalised recommendations