Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 205–211 | Cite as

Experimental and numerical investigation of transversal damage in carbon fiber reinforced composites using X-FEM analysis

  • R. F. Swati
  • L. H. Wen
  • Hassan Elahi
  • A. A. Khan
  • S. Shad
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Damage modelling along with crack behavior carbon fiber resin reinforced composites under tensile and three-point bending loading were simulated in this study for different variables and cases. Extensive experimentation was performed for carbon fiber composites by grouping them into different categories of layup, orientations and boundary conditions accordingly. The specimen dimensions and the loading conditions were evaluated in the mentioned categories for the transversal damage as a primary objective of the study. The composite models for single layer and multilayer were modelled in extended finite element method (XFEM) module in ABAQUS software, and interaction subroutines were included for the mentioned models and experimental behavior and response were studied. The damage progress was investigated and then the criteria of stress-strain as well as stress distributions/intensity factor in the fiber and matrix were the outputs. The purpose of the study was to validate the numerical and simulation outputs with experimental results for XFEM as a framework for the crack initiation, propagation along an arbitrary, mesh-independent, solution-dependent path, which is being widely used. The key parameters and critical aspects of convergence of the results, while carrying out damage and fracture analysis when using numerical simulation in comparison with the experimentation setup, required precise and accurate understanding towards modelling the above-mentioned cases. The study offers novel methodology and pre-development of framework for crack modelling from single to multi-crack for carbon fibers. The study started with the results from previous studies of both transversal cracks and delamination followed by the study of fracture in the material. Different specimens were studied and tested, and the results were in close convergence between experimental and numerical data for multiple cases.

Keywords

Extended FEM CFRC ABAQUS Cohesive zone Progressive damage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. L. Curiel Sosa and N. Karapurath, Delamination modelling of GLARE using the extended finite element method, Compos. Sci. Technol., 72 (7) (2012) 788–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    X. Su, Z. Yang and G. Liu, Finite element modelling of complex 3D static and dynamic crack propagation by embedding cohesive elements in abaqus, Acta Mech. Solida Sin., 23 (3) (2010) 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. C. Baietto, E. Pierres and A. Gravouil, A multi-model XFEM strategy dedicated to frictional crack growth under cyclic fretting fatigue loadings, Int. J. Solids Struct., 47 (10) (2010) 1405–1423.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    P. Hauseux, E. Roubin, D. M. Seyedi and J. B. Colliat, FE modelling with strong discontinuities for 3D tensile and shear fractures: Application to underground excavation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 309 (2016) 269–287.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. F. Swati, L. H. Wen, H. Elahi, A. A. Khan and S. Shad, Extended finite element method (XFEM) analysis of fiber reinforced composites for prediction of micro-crack propagation and delaminations in progressive damage: A review, Microsyst. Technol. (2018) 1–17.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    L. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Gong, N. Hu and N. Li, XFEM-based model for simulating zigzag delamination growth in laminated composites under mode I loading, Eng. Fract. Mech., 192 (2018) 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    P. Kanouté, D. P. Boso, J. L. Chaboche and B. A. Schrefler, Multiscale methods for composites: A review, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 16 (1) (2009) 31–75.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    K. Dong, J. Zhang, L. Jin, B. Gu and B. Sun, Multi-scale finite element analyses on the thermal conductive behaviors of 3D braided composites, Compos. Struct., 143 (2016) 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. Lesiuk, M. Katkowski, J. Correia, A. M. de Jesus and W. Błażejewski, Fatigue crack growth rate in CFRP reinforced constructional old steel, Int. J. Struct. Integr. (2018).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    S. P. A. Bordas et al., Strain smoothing in FEM and XFEM, Computers and Structures (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Li, M. D. Thouless, A. M. Waas, J. A. Schroeder and P. D. Zavattieri, Mixed-mode cohesive-zone models for fracture of an adhesively bonded polymer-matrix composite, Eng. Fract. Mech. (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    I. G. García, M. Paggi and V. Mantic, Fiber-size effects on the onset of fiber-matrix debonding under transverse tension: A comparison between cohesive zone and finite fracture mechanics models, Eng. Fract. Mech. (2014).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    H. Elahi, A. Israr, M. Z. Khan and S. Ahmad, Robust vehicle suspension system by converting active & passive control of a vehicle to semi-active control system analytically, J. Autom. Control Eng., 4 (4) (2016) 300–304.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    D. Lee and S. Shin, Extended-finite element method as analysis model for Gauss point density topology optimization method, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    P. P. Camanho, C. G. Davila and M. F. de Moura, Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials, J. Compos. Mater. (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Turon, P. P. Camanho, J. Costa and C. G. Dávila, A damage model for the simulation of delamination in advanced composites under variable-mode loading, Mech. Mater. (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    P. Broumand and A. R. Khoei, X-FEM modeling of dynamic ductile fracture problems with a nonlocal damage-viscoplasticity model, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 99 (2015) 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    X. Li and J. Chen, The implementation of the extended cohesive damage model for multicrack evolution in laminated composites, Compos. Struct., 139 (2016) 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    N. A. Abdullah, J. L. Curiel-Sosa, Z. A. Taylor, B. Tafazzolimoghaddam, J. L. Martinez Vicente and C. Zhang, Transversal crack and delamination of laminates using XFEM, Compos. Struct., 173 (2017) 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    E. Giner, N. Sukumar, J. E. Tarancón and F. J. Fuenmayor, An Abaqus implementation of the extended finite element method, Eng. Fract. Mech., 76 (3) (2009) 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. Shi, D. Chopp, J. Lua, N. Sukumar and T. Belytschko, Abaqus implementation of extended finite element method using a level set representation for three-dimensional fatigue crack growth and life predictions, Eng. Fract. Mech., 77 (14) (2010) 2840–2863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. F. Swati
    • 1
    • 2
  • L. H. Wen
    • 1
  • Hassan Elahi
    • 2
    • 3
  • A. A. Khan
    • 2
  • S. Shad
    • 1
  1. 1.School of AstronauticsNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Institute of Space TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.La Sapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations