Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 32, Issue 11, pp 5521–5532 | Cite as

Evaluation of the ventilation safety requirements for the fuel gas supply system room of a gas-fueled vessel: Simulated leaks of methane and propane

  • Joon-Ho Kim
  • Deog-Hee Doh
  • Byung Chul Choi
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

This study conducted the ventilation and gas dispersion analysis using fire dynamics simulator (FDS) for fuel gas supply system (FGSS) room of a 50000 dead weight tonnage (DWT) gas-fueled vessel sailing at a constant velocity, under the assumption that methane and propane gases leak in the fuel preparation room containing the FGSS. To assess the transient flammable extents for representative risk scenarios, four gaseous leak scenarios with the same mass flux were selected as follows: Propane at–30 °C and at 20 °C, and methane at–150 °C and at 20 °C. The same ventilation capacity was applied in each of these scenarios, with different inlet/outlet configurations. As a result, all cases satisfied the international code requirements for the hazardous areas of ventilation inlet/outlet and the gas detector locations. However, only the ventilation capacity requirement was insufficient to ensure optimum ventilation performance of the FGSS room. Therefore, a safety design procedure considering ventilation efficiency was required to determine the most appropriate number and location of ventilation inlets/outlets in the FGSS room beyond the international code.

Keywords

Gas fueled vessel FGSS room Dispersion Ventilation Methane Propane 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    B. C. Choi and Y. M. Kim, Thermodynamic analysis of a dual loop heat recovery system with trilateral cycle applied to exhaust gases of internal combustion engine for propulsion of the 6800 TEU container ship, Energy, 58 (2013) 404–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    B. C. Choi, Thermodynamic analysis of a transcritical CO2 heat recovery system with 2–stage reheat applied to cooling water of internal combustion engine for propulsion of the 6800 TEU container ship, Energy, 107 (2016) 532–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    International Maritime Organization, http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Pages/Default.aspx.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. Woo, B. C. Choi and A. F. Ghoniem, Experimental and numerical studies on NOx emission characteristics in laminar non–premixed jet flames of ammonia–containing methane fuel with oxygen/nitrogen oxidizer, Energy, 114 (2016) 961–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    B. C. Choi, S. K. Choi, S. H. Chung, J. S. Kim and J. H. Choi, Experimental and numerical investigation of fuel mixing effects on soot structures in counterflow diffusion flames, Int. J. Auto. Tech.–Kor., 12 (2) (2011) 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. Jafarzadeh, N. Paltrinieri, I. B. Utne and H. Ellingsen, LNG–fuelled fishing vessels: A systems engineering approach, Transp. Res. D, 50 (2017) 202–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    International Maritime Organization, International code of safety for ships using gases or other low–flashpoint fuels (IGF Code), Resolution MSC, 391 (95) (2015).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    B. U. Jeong, B. S. Lee and P. Zhou, Quantitative risk assessment of fuel preparation room having high–pressure fuel gas supply system for LNG fuelled ship, Ocean Eng., 137 (1) (2017) 450–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Thunderhead Engineering, Pyrosim user manual (2016).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    K. McGrattan, S. Hostikka, R. McDermott, J. Floyd, C. Weinschenk and K. Overholt, Fire dynamic simulator user’s guide, NIST special publication 1019, 6th edition (2017).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    B. C. Choi, K. H. Park and D. H. Doh, Impacts of cold gas temperature and cylindrical obstacles on the dispersing flammable limits of accidental methane releases in an LNG bunkering terminal, J. Hazard Mater., 355 (2018) 104–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    K. McGrattan, S. Hostikka, R. McDermott, J. Floyd, C. Weinschenk and K. Overholt, Fire dynamic simulator technical reference guide volume 1: Mathematical model, NIST special publication 1018–1, 6th edition (2017).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    MATLAB R2015a, The MathWorks, Inc. (2015).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ocean Science and Technology SchoolKorea Maritime & Ocean UniversityBusanKorea
  2. 2.Division of Mechanical EngineeringKorea Maritime & Ocean UniversityBusanKorea
  3. 3.R&D CenterKorean Register of ShippingBusanKorea

Personalised recommendations