Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 32, Issue 11, pp 5127–5132 | Cite as

Probabilistic fatigue-creep life reliability assessment of aircraft turbine disk

  • Kossi Mawuena Tomevenya
  • ShuJie LiuEmail author


Life consumption is one of the serious concerns for turbine disk performance and maintenance cost. The low cycle fatigue of turbine disk coming from the creep and their interaction has a direct influence on life and reliability of an aero engine. So, in this paper, the finite element analysis fatigue creep on Nickel base super alloy GH4133 turbine disk at 650 °C is computed based on the material properties, load and performance parameter of the low cycle fatigue as a random factor. The LCF Manson coffin model for cycles to failure (Nf ) and Larson Miller (Nc) are calculated. Damage fraction summation is used to calculate the low cycle fatigue creep life and fitted by two parameter Weibull distribution. Therefore, Monte Carlo simulation is used in random sampling from two parameter Weibull distribution to estimate the reliability assessment of turbine disk.


Turbine disk Finite element analysis Fatigue creep life prediction Reliability analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    G. F. Harrison and W. J. Evans, A review of fatigue assessment procedures for aeroengine fracture critical components, Journal of the Engineering Integrity Society (2000).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    L. Witek, Failure analysis of turbine disc of an aero engine, Engineering Failure Analysis, 13 (1) (2006) 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. A. Meguid, P. S. Kanth and A. Czekanski, Finite element analysis of fir–tree region in the turbine discs, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 35 (4) (2000) 305–317.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Z. Z. Song, Aero engine reliability and fault control engineering, Beijing: Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2002).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    W. G. Wang, Research on prediction model for disk LCF life and experiment assessment methodology, Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2006).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    X. Wu, W. Beres and S. Yandt, Challenges in life prediction of gas turbine critical components, Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal, 54 (2) (2008) 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. P. Zhu, Research on hybrid probabilistic physics of failure modeling and fatigue life estimation of high–temperature structures, Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (2011).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    K. Walker, he effects of stress ratio during crack propagation and fatigue for 2014–t3 and 7075–t6 aluminum, Effect of Environment and Complex Load History on Fatigue life, ASTM STP 462, American Society of Testing and Materials (1970) 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    K. N. Smith, P. Watson and T. H. Topper, A stress–strain function for the fatigue of metals, Journal of Materials, 5 (4) (1970) 767–768.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. E. Melis, E. V. Zaretsky and R. August, Probabilistic analysis of aircraft gas turbine disk life and reliability, Journal of Propulsion and Power, 15 (5) (1999) 658–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. P. Zhu, H. Z. Huang and L. P. He, A generalized energybased fatigue–creep damage parameter for life prediction of turbine disk alloys, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 90 (2012) 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Z. Lv, H.–Z. Huang, H. Gao, F.–J. Zuo and H.–K. Wang, Lifetime prediction for turbine discs based on a modified Walker strain model, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29 (10) (2015) 4143–4152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Q. Zhao, H. Yao, Q. Xu and B. Wen, Prediction method for steady–state response of local rubbing blade–rotor systems, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29 (4) (2015) 1537–1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. Zhou, H.–Z. and Z. Peng, Fatigue life prediction of turbine blades based on a modified equivalent strain model, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31 (9) (2017) 4203–4213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. A. Miner, Cumulative damage in fatigue, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 12 (3) (1945) 159–164.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. Filippini, Creep–fatigue at high temperature of notched single crystal superalloys, ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ., 1539 (6) STP (2011) 348–374.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    T. Aven, On the practical implementation of the Bayesian paradigm in reliability and risk analysis, London: World Scientific (2015).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    P. Jiang, Y. Y. Xing, W. K. Cheng and K. Guo, An introduction to reliability engineering, Beijing: National Defense Industry Press (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    H. Rinne, The Weibull distribution a handbook, Crc Press Boca Raton Fl, 9 (3) (2008) 27–97.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    J. Mi, Y. F. Li, W. Peng and H. Z. Huang, Reliability analysis of complex multi–state system with common cause failure based on evidential networks, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 174 (2018) 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    H. Z. Huang, C. G. Huang, Z. Peng, Y. F. Li and H. Yin, Fatigue life prediction of fan blade using nominal stress method and cumulative fatigue damage theory, International Journal of Turbo & Jet Engines, Doi:–2017–0015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalian, LiaoningChina

Personalised recommendations