Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 32, Issue 11, pp 5055–5061 | Cite as

Effects of work hardening models on low-cycle fatigue evaluations of coiled tubing with CT-100 steel

  • Tae-Young Ryu
  • Jae-Boong Choi
  • Nam-Su Huh
  • Soo-Chang Kang
  • Ki-Seok Kim
Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study, low-cycle fatigue life of a coiled tubing (CT) with a CT-100 steel was evaluated by using various work hardening models. Tensile and low-cycle fatigue tests were performed, and experimental results were used to calibrate material model constants. A nonlinear finite element model was constructed in the ABAQUS program by using a CT fatigue test machine. During the test cycles, bending and straightening conditions were repeated and histories of strains were collected. The multiaxial low-cycle fatigue life was calculated by using Manson–Coffin relation and Tresca criterion. The kinematic and combined hardening models can be used to evaluate the fatigue life of CT, and their results are conservative compared with the fatigue test results. Results of the present study can be used as the basic data in establishing CT fatigue analysis.

Keywords

Coiled tubing Life prediction Low-cycle fatigue Work hardening model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    S. M. Tipton, Multiaxial plasticity and fatigue life prediction in coiled tubing, Fatigue Lifetime Predictive Techniques, ASTM STP 1292, 3 (1996) 283–304.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    X. Tian, H. Zhang, Q. Duan and Y. Ji, Establishment and application of fatigue life prediction models for coiled tubing, Proc. of the ASME 2015 PVP Conference, PVP2015–45130, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (2015).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    K. R. Newman, P. A. Brown and S. Dowell, Development of a stadard coiled–tubing fatigue test, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Proc. of 68th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 26539, Huston, Texas, USA (1993) 303–309Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. A. Bannantine, J. J. Comer and J. L. Handrock, Fundamentals of metal fatigue analysis, Prentice–Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA (1990).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. M. Collin, T. Parenteau, G. Mauvoisin and P. Pilvin, Material parameters identification using experimental continuous spherical indentation for cyclic hardening, Computational Material Science, 46 (2009) 333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    C. O. Frederick and P. J. Armstrong, A mathematical representation of the multiaxial bauschinger effect, Materials at High Temperatures, 24 (2007) 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    G. H. Koo and J. H. Lee, Investigation of ratcheting characteristics of modified 9Cr–1Mo steel by using the chaboche constitutive model, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 84 (2007) 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tae-Young Ryu
    • 1
  • Jae-Boong Choi
    • 1
  • Nam-Su Huh
    • 2
  • Soo-Chang Kang
    • 3
  • Ki-Seok Kim
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan UniversityNatural Science CampusSuwonKorea
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical System and Design EngineeringSeoul National University of Science and TechnologySeoulKorea
  3. 3.Global R&D Center, POSCOIncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations