Effect of welding residual stress redistribution on the Charpy absorbed energy
Small specimens enclosing the welded joint are cut out when inspection for the welded joint is carried out. The cutting, however, always leads to the redistribution of residual stresses developed in the original welded joint. This study investigated the difference between the primary and secondary absorbed energy of the welded joint. The primary absorbed energy is the absorbed energy when as-weld residual stress (RS) is present. The secondary absorbed energy indicates the absorbed energy when as-weld RS in the welded joint was redistributed by the wire-cutting (WC) process. Finite element (FE) simulation of the plate welding, WC, and Charpy V-notch (CVN) test was performed to examine the effect of residual stress redistribution on the absorbed energy. Results showed that the secondary absorbed energy was, on an average, 7.8 % lower than the primary absorbed energy. This difference indicates that the primary absorbed energy of the welded joint has been underestimated from the perspective of an inspector. The difference in primary and secondary absorbed energy may not be negligible when designing large welded structures such as large pipelines.
KeywordsAs-weld residual stress Redistribution of as-weld residual stress Wire cutting Charpy absorbed energy FE simulation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Stress tech Oy FINLAND, www.Stresstechgroup.com.Google Scholar
- I. C. Noyan and J. B. Cohen, Residual stress-measurement by diffraction and interpretation, Springer (1987).Google Scholar
- ASTM SEC.II SA370, Standard test methods and definetions for mechanical testing of steel products, ASTM (2010).Google Scholar
- Material properties for Davis-Besse Unit 1. RCP suction, RCP discharge, Cold Leg drain and core flood nozzles preemptive weld overlay repairs, Structural Integrity Associates, Inc. (2009).Google Scholar
- H. Brooks and D. Aitchison, Using the finite element method to determine the temperature distributions in hot-wire polystyrene cutting, RDPM 12th (2011).Google Scholar
- G. R. Cowper and P. S. Symonds, Strain hardening and strain rate effects in the impact loading of cantilever beams, Applied Mechanics Report, Brown Univ. (1958) 28.Google Scholar
- B. Tanguy, R. Piques, L. Laiarinandrasana and A. Pineau, Notch stress strain distribution in Charpy V specimen/experiments and modelling, ECF13 Sebastian (2000).Google Scholar
- Y. C. Jang, A study for crack stability assessment of direct vessel injection nozzle of reactor vessel considering crack path, Ph.D. Thesis, Chung-Ang University, Korea (2015).Google Scholar
- V. G. Navas, I. Ferreres, J. A. Maranon, C. Garcia-Rosales and J. G. Sevillano, Electro-discharge machining (EDM) versus hard turning and grinding—Comparison of residual stresses and surface integrity generated in AISI O1 tool steel, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 195 (1) (2008) 186–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar