Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 32, Issue 7, pp 3191–3199 | Cite as

Optimization of thick wind turbine airfoils using a genetic algorithm

  • Jae-Ho Jeong
  • Soo-Hyun KimEmail author


In this study, we optimized thick airfoils for wind turbines using a genetic algorithm (GA) coupled with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and geometric parameterization based on the Akima curve fitting method. Complex and separated flow fields around the airfoils of each design generation were obtained by performing Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes steady flow simulation based on the in-house code of an implicit high-resolution upwind relaxation scheme for finite volume formulation. Airfoils with 40 % and 35 % thickness values were selected as baseline airfoils. An airfoil becomes thicker toward the blade root area, thereby increasing blade stiffness and lowering its aerodynamic efficiency. We optimized the airfoils to simultaneously maximize aerodynamic efficiency and blade thickness. The design variables and objective function correspond to the airfoil coordinates and the lift-to-drag ratio at a high angle of attack with airfoil thickness constraints. We improved the lift-to-drag ratio by 30 %~40 % compared with the baseline airfoils by performing optimization using GA and CFD. The improved airfoils are expected to achieve a 5 %~11 % higher torque coefficient while minimizing the thrust coefficient near the blade root area.


Wind turbine blade Thick airfoil Genetic algorithm Optimization Computational fluid dynamics Vortex separation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    G. B. Eke and J. I. Onyewudiala, Optimization of wind turbine blades using genetic algorithm, Global Journal of Research in Engineering, 10 (2010) 22–26.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Afzal and K. Y. Kim, Optimization of a micromixer using several optimization algorithms, Proc. of Korean Society for Computational Fluids Engineering (2015) 157–158.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    C. A. C. Coello and G. T. Pulido, A micro-genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 93 (2010) 126–43.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. H. Kim and C. G. Kim, Optimal design of composite stiffened panel with cohesive elements using micro-genetic algorithm, Journal of Composite Materials, 42 (2008) 2259–2273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    K. Deb, Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, 1st Ed., Wiley, Chichester, U.K. (2001).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. H. Kim, J. H. Choi, A. Husain and K. Y. Kim, Multiobjective optimization of a centrifugal compressor impeller through evolutionary algorithms, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 224 (5) (2010) 711–721.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. H. Kim, B. Ovgor, K. H. Cha, J. H. Kim, S. Lee and K. Y. Kim, Optimization of the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performance of an axial-flow fan, AIAA Journal, 52 (9) (2014) 2032–2044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    D. Sasaki, S. Obayashi and K. Nakahashi, Navier-Stokes optimization of supersonic wings with four objectives using evolutionary algorithm, Journal of Aircraft, 39 (2002) 621–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Shahrokhi and A. Jahangirian, A surrogate assisted evolutionary optimization method with application to the transonic airfoil design, Optim. Eng., 42 (2010) 497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Y. Pehlivanoglu and B. Yagiz, Aerodynamic design prediction using surrogate-based modeling in genetic algorithm architecture, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 23 (2011) 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. H. Mohamed, G. Janiga and D. Thevenin, Multiobjective optimization of the airfoil shape of Wells turbine used for wave energy conversion, Journal of Energy, 36 (2011) 438–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. F. P. Ribeiro, A. M. Awruch and H. M. Gomes, An airfoil optimization technique for wind turbine, Journal of Applied Mathematical Modeling, 36 (2012) 4898–4907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    T. Winnemoller and C. P. van Dam, Design and numerical optimization of thick airfoils including blunt trailing edge, Journal of Aircraft, 44 (2007) 232–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    F. Grasso, Development of thick airfoils for wind turbines, Journal of Aircraft, 50 (2013) 975–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Drela and M. B. Giles, Viscous-inviscid analysis of transonic and low reynolds number airfoils, AIAA Journal, 25 (1987) 1347–1355.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. H. Holland, Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, Ann Arbor, Ml: University of Michigan Press (1975).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    D. E. Goldberg, Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley (1989).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Modeling with splines and NURBS, GCC: Art Department, Scholar
  19. [19]
    H. Akima, A new method of interpolation and smooth curve fitting based on local procedures, J. Assoc. Comput., 17 (1970) 589–602.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    F. R. Menter, Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA Journal, 32 (1994) 1598–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    M. Furukawa, T. Nakano and M. Inoe, Unsteady Navier-Stokes simulation of transonic cascade flow using an unfactored implicit upwind relaxation scheme with inner iterations, ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 114 (1992) 599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. Furukawa, M. Yamasaki and M. Inoe, A zonal approach for Navier-Stokes computations of compressible cascade flow fields using a TVD finite volume method, ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 113 (1991) 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    S. R. Chakravarthy, Relaxation method for unfactored implicit upwind schemes, 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting Paper (1982) No. 84–0165.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    W. K. Anderson, J. L. Thomas and B. van Leer, Comparison of finite volume flux vector splitting for the Euler equations, AIAA Journal, 24 (1986) 1453–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    G. D. van Alvada, B. van Leer and W. W. Roberts, A comparative study of computational methods in cosmic gas dynamics, Journal of Aston. Astrophysics, 108 (1982) 76–84.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    D. C. Wilcox, Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models, AIAA Journal, 26 (1988) 1299–1310.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    ANSYS Inc., ANSYS CFX-solver theory guide (2011).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Korea Atomic Energy Research InstituteDaejeonKorea
  2. 2.Korea Institute of Energy ResearchDaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations