Effect of Strain Rate on Impact Behavior of Aluminum Foam
- 68 Downloads
Due to increase of terrorist threats and attacks, reasonable and economical designs for impact resistant protective structures are necessary. To ensure the appropriate use of aluminum foam panels as sacrificial panels, the compressive behavior of aluminum foam must be investigated. This work presents broad experimental and numerical investigations of the strain rate sensitivity of closed-cell aluminum foam and its effect on the strength parameters of foam. Air gun tests for direct impact testing and split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests were performed to investigate the deformation and energy absorption characteristics of aluminum foam with an increase in strain rate. Along with these experiments, numerical finite element analyses for both air gun and SHPB tests were performed with LS-DYNA. For the explicit analysis, the strain rate was considered in the material model, and the experimental work was verified by the numerical approach. The deformations and yield strengths of the aluminum foam were investigated with increasing strain rate. Parametric analyses were also conducted to determine the minimum required thickness of aluminum foam and an equation is proposed to calculate the minimum foam thickness while considering the effect of the strain rate. Moreover, to ensure realistic and economical designs for protective structures, a recommendation was provided for the aluminum foam thickness. This concept is compared with another study where strain rate effect was not considered for a close range blast load resistant protective structure. The pressure transmitted through the aluminum foam to the attached concrete wall was measured and the magnitude of reflected and mitigated transmitted pressure was observed. Consideration of strain rate effect leads to a lower required foam thickness and a lower magnitude of the pressure transmitted to the structure.
Keywordsstrain rate aluminum foam air gun test SHPB test explicit analysis parametric analyses energy absorption
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The first author would like to acknowledge the publication support of the University of Newcastle, Australia through Postgraduate Research Support Scheme.
- Ashby, M. F., Evans, T., Fleck, N. A., Hutchinson, J. W., Wadley, H. N. G., and Gibson, L. J. (2000). Metal foams: A design guide, Elsevier, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7219-1.X5000-4.
- Banthia, N., Chokri, K., and Trottier, J. F. (1995). “Impact tests on cement-based fiber reinforced composites.” ACI Special Publication, Vol. 155, pp. 171–188.Google Scholar
- CYMAT (2009). Technical manual for CYMAT smart metal, CYMAT Technologies Ltd., Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
- Hopkinson, B. (1914). “A method of measuring the pressure produced in the detonation of high explosives or by the impact of bullets.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, Vol. 89, No. 612, pp. 437–456, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1914.0008.Google Scholar
- LS-DYNA R11 (2018a). LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual, Volume I, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, California, USA.Google Scholar
- LS-DYNA R11 (2018b). LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual, Volume II: Material Models, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, California, USA.Google Scholar
- Mukai, T., Kanahashi, H., Miyoshi, T., Mabuchi, M., Nieh, T. G., and Higashi, K. (1999). “Experimental study of energy absorption in a close-celled aluminum foam under dynamic loading.” Scripta Materialia, Vol. 40, No. 8, pp. 921–927, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00038-X.Google Scholar
- Müllerschön, H., Franz, U., Münz, T., and Stander, N. (2001). “The identification of rate-dependent material properties in foams using LS-OPT.” Proc. of 3rd European LS-DYNA Users Conference, Paris, France.Google Scholar
- Murali, G., Venkatesh, J., Lokesh, N., Nava, T. R., and Karthikeyan, K. (2018). “Comparative experimental and analytical modeling of impact energy dissipation of ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 3112–3119, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1678-3.Google Scholar
- Reid, S. R., Reddy, T. Y., and Peng, C. (1993). “Dynamic compression of cellular structures and materials.” Structural Crashworthiness and Failure, pp. 295–340.Google Scholar
- Sadot, O., Anteby, I., Harush, S., Levintant, O., Nizri, E., Ostraich, B., Shenker, A., Gal, E., Kivity, Y., and Ben-Dor, G. (2005). “Experimental investigation of dynamic properties of aluminum foams.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 8, pp. 1226–1232, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:8(1226).Google Scholar
- Schenker, A., Anteby, I., Nizri, E., Ostraich, B., Kivity, Y., Sadot, O., Haham, O., Michaelis, R., Gal, E., and Ben-Dor, G. (2005). “Foam-protected reinforced concrete structures under impact: Experimental and numerical studies.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 8, pp. 1233–1242, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:8(1233).Google Scholar
- Tabatabaei, Z. S., Volz, J. S., Baird, J., Gliha, B. P., and Keener, D. I. (2013). “Experimental and numerical analyses of long carbon fiber reinforced concrete panels exposed to blast loading.” International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 57, pp. 70–80, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.01.006.Google Scholar
- Yun, N. R., Park, S. D., Muhit, I. B. and Shim, C. S. (2014a). “Impact tests on aluminum foams.” Proc. of the 4th International Technical Conference, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar