Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 23, Issue 9, pp 3978–3992 | Cite as

Non-probabilistic Integrated Reliability Analysis of Structures with Fuzzy Interval Uncertainties using the Adaptive GPR-RS Method

  • Minghui Liu
  • Xiaoling WangEmail author
  • Xiaobin Zhu
  • Wenlong Chen
  • Xiao Li
Hydraulic Engineering
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Due to its weak dependence on the quantity of variable samples, the non-probabilistic reliability analysis method based on the convex set model is applicable to practical problems in structural engineering with inherent uncertainties. However, when dealing with the black-box limit-state function issues in practical complex structural engineering, the traditional quadratic polynomial response surface (QP-RS) method has the problem of insufficient precision in approximating a highly nonlinear function. Meanwhile, fixing the limits of interval variables is trickier in case of scant samples and meager statistical information. To remedy the above deficiencies, this paper introduces a reasonable integrated reliability analysis approach. First, an adaptive Gaussian process regression response surface (GPR-RS) method that dynamically improves the fitted accuracy near the design point of the black-box limit-state function is formulated. Furthermore, the integrated reliability index with consideration of fuzzy interval uncertainties is presented. Three validation and two application examples are employed, which have justified the approach as a more reasonable assessor of practical complex structural reliability with safer results.

Keywords

structural integrated reliability interval variable non-probabilistic reliability fuzzy set theory adaptive Gaussian process regression response surface method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2018YFC0407101); the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number U1765205); and the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 51439005).

References

  1. Alqadi, A. N. S., Mustapha, K. N. B., Naganathan, S., and Al-cadi, Q. N. S. (2012). “Uses of central composite design and surface response to evaluate the influence of constituent materials on fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 407–416, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1308-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai, Y. C., Han, X., Jiang, C., and Bi, R. G. (2014). “A response-surface-based structural reliability analysis method by using non-probability convex model.” Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 38, Nos. 15–16, pp. 3834–3847, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.11.053.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Haim, Y. (1993). “Convex models of uncertainty in radial pulse buckling of shells.” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 60, No. 3, p. 683, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2900858.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, W. L., Wang, X. L., Liu, M. H., Zhu, Y. S., and Deng, S. H. (2018). “Probabilistic risk assessment of rcc dam considering grey-stochastic-fuzzy uncertainty.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, Vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 4399–4413, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0765-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elshakoff, I. and Elisseeff, P. (1994). “Non-probabilistic convex theoretic modeling of scatter in material properties.” Aiaa Journal, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 843–849, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12062.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Gomes, H. M. and Awruch, A. M. (2004). “Comparison of response surface and neural network with other methods for structural reliability analysis.” Structural Safety, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 49–67, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(03)00022-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guo, S. X. and Lu, Z. Z. (2015). “A non-probabilistic robust reliability method for analysis and design optimization of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters.” Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 39, No. 7, pp. 1985–2002, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.10.026.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hadjmohammadi, M. R. and Kamel, K. (2008). “Response surface methodology and support vector machine for the optimization of separation in linear gradient elution.” Journal of Separation Science, Vol. 31, No. 22, pp. 3864–3870, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200800343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huh, J. (2000). “Reliability analysis of nonlinear structural systems using response surface method.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 135–143, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02830867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hurtado, J. E. and Alvarez, D. A. (2012). “The encounter of interval and probabilistic approaches to structural reliability at the design point.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 225–228, pp. 74–94, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2012.03.020.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang, C., Bi, R. G., Lu, G. Y., and Han, X. (2013). “Structural reliability analysis using non-probabilistic convex model.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 254, No. 2, pp. 83–98, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2012.10.020.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang, C., Han, X., Lu, G. Y., Liu, J., Zhang, Z., and Bai, Y. C. (2011) “Correlation analysis of non-probabilistic convex model and corresponding structural reliability technique.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 200, No. 33, pp. 2528–2546, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2011.04.007.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Jin, S. S. and Jung, H. J. (2016). “Self-adaptive sampling for sequential surrogate modeling of time-consuming finite element analysis.” Smart Structures and Systems, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 611–629, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.4.611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kang, F., Han, S., Salgado, R., and Li, J. (2015). “System probabilistic stability analysis of soil slopes using Gaussian process regression with Latin hypercube sampling.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 63, pp. 13–25, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.08.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keprate, A., Ratnayake, R. M. C., and Sankararaman, S. (2017). “Adaptive Gaussian process regression as an alternative to FEM for prediction of stress intensity factor to assess fatigue degradation in offshore pipeline.” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, Vol. 153, pp. 45–58, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2017.05.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, T. and Yang, X. (2018). “Reliability analysis of tunnel face in broken soft rocks using improved response surface method.” International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 04018021, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luo, Y., Li, A., and Kang, Z. (2011). “Reliability-based design optimization of adhesive bonded steel-concrete composite beams with probabilistic and non-probabilistic uncertainties.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 2110–2119, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marence, M. and Evangeliou, P. (2017). “Reliability assessment of gravity dam block by coupling a directional adaptive response surface full probabilistic method and 3D coupled flow-stress finite element analysis.” 14th ICOLD International Benchmark Workshop on Numerical Analysis of Dams, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  19. Min, T. K. and Huy, P. T. (2010). “A Soil-Water hysteresis model for unsaturated sands based on fuzzy set plasticity theory.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 165–172, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0165-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Okuda, T., Tanaka, H., and Asai, K. (1978) “A formulation of fuzzy decision problems with fuzzy information using probability measures of fuzzy events.” Information and Control, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 135–147, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(78)90151-1.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Park, H. J., Um, J. G., Woo, I., and Kim, J. W. (2012) “Application of fuzzy set theory to evaluate the probability of failure in rock slopes.” Engineering Geology, Vol. 125, No. 1, pp. 92–101, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.11.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Quéau, L. M., Kimiaei, M., and Randolph, M. F. (2015) “Approximation of the maximum dynamic stress range in steel catenary risers using artificial neural networks.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 172–185, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.02.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rasmussen, C. E. and Williams, C. K. I. (2005). Gaussian processes for machine learning, MIT Press, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Richard, B., Cremona, C., and Adelaide, L. (2012). “A response surface method based on support vector machines trained with an adaptive experimental design.” Structural Safety, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 14–21, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rocco, C. M. and Moreno, J. A. (2002). “Fast Monte Carlo reliability evaluation using support vector machine.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 237–243, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00015-7.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Sankararaman, S. (2012). Uncertainty quantification and integration in engineering systems, PhD Thesis, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Su, H. Z., Li, J. Y., Wen, Z. P., and Fu, Z. Q. (2016). “Dynamic non-probabilistic reliability evaluation and service life prediction for arch dams considering time-varying effects.” Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 40, Nos. 15–16, pp. 6908–6923, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.02.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tao, Y. R., Cao, L., and Huang, Z. H. H. (2017). “A novel evidence-based fuzzy reliability analysis method for structures.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 1237–1249, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1570-7.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tomczak, M. and Jaskowski, P. (2018). “Application of type-2 interval fuzzy sets to contractor qualification process” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 2702–2713, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0431-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang, X., Qiu, Z., Elishakoff, I., and Lin, Y. K. (2012). “Non-probabilistic interval reliability analysis of wing flutter.” Aiaa Journal, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 743–748, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, X., Wang, R., Wang, L., Chen, X., and Geng, X. (2018). “An efficient single-loop strategy for reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization under non-probabilistic set theory.” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 73, pp. 148–163, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.11.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang, X., Wang, R., and Xu, C. (2017). “Discovering the relationship between generalization and uncertainty by incorporating complexity of classification.” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 703–715, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2017.2653223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zadeh, L. A. (1968). “Probability measures of fuzzy events.” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 421–427, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(68)90078-4.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang, Z., Jiang, C., Han, X., Hu, D., and Yu, S. (2014). “A response surface approach for structural reliability analysis using evidence theory.” Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 37–45, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao, W., Liu, W., and Yang, Q. (2016). “An improvement of the response surface method based on reference points for structural reliability analysis” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, Vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 2775–2782, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1312-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhou, F., Xu, X., and Zhang, X. (2018) “Numerical integration method for triple integrals using the second kind Chebyshev wavelets and Gauss-Legendre quadrature.” Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 3027–3052, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-017-0494-1.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and SafetyTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations