Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 1617–1625 | Cite as

Effects of Soaking and Cyclic Wet-dry Actions on Shear Strength of an Artificially Mixed Sand

  • Jun-Jie WangEmail author
  • Yong-Feng Zhou
  • Xiao Wu
  • Hui-Ping Zhang
Hydraulic Engineering
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

This study focuses on the effects of soaking action and wetting-drying cycles on the shear strength of a sandstone-mudstone mixture. This mixture is constantly used as a filler in earth structures along bank of harbor or in a large reservoir. Two-type direct shear tests in laboratory, Soaking Direct Shear Test (SDST) and Wetting-Drying Direct Shear Test (WDDST), were carried out. The experimental data indicate that the shear strength is reduced by the soaking action and wetting-drying cycles. While the period of soaking time (t) increased from 24 to 392 hours, the values of initial angle of shearing resistance (φ0) and reducing angle of shearing resistance (φd) reduced from 45.17° to 40.26° and from 19.68° to 12.28°, respectively, along logarithmic curves. With increment of the number of wetting-drying cycles (N) from 1 to 30, the values of φ0 and φd reduced from 40.99° to 38.84° and from 8.76° to 7.58°, respectively, along logarithmic curves. During the soaking action or wetting-drying cycles, the inevitably lessening of the stiffness of soil particle would happen, and hence the shear strength of mixture is decreased. With increment of t or N value, the rates of effects is instantly reducing.

Keywords

sandstone-mudstone particle mixture shear strength soaking time wetting-drying cycle direct shear test 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ASTM (1998). Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils, D422-63, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  2. ASTM (2000). Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified soil classification system), D2487, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1520/D2487-00.
  3. ASTM (2011). Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions, D3080/D3080M-11, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1520/D3080_D3080M-11.
  4. CGMREDC (2002). Chongqing geological map (Scale 1:500,000), Chongqing Geological and Mineral Resource Exploration and Development Corporation, Chongqing Yangtze River Map Printing Factory, Chongqing, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  5. Chen, Z.-B., Zhu, J.-G., and Jian, W.-B. (2015). “Quick triaxial consolidated drained test on gravelly soil.” Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 985–995, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140213.Google Scholar
  6. Estabragh, A. R., Parsaei, B., and Javadi, A. A. (2015). “Laboratory investigation of the effect of cyclic wetting and drying on the behaviour of an expansive soil.” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 304–314, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao, Y. F., Zhu, D. S., Zhang, F., Lei, G. H., and Qin, H. Y. (2014). “Stability analysis of three-dimensional slopes under water drawdown conditions.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 51, No. 11, pp. 1355–1364, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goh, S. G., Rahardjo, H., and Leong, E. C. (2014). “Shear strength of unsaturated soils under multiple drying-wetting cycles.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 140, No. 2, 06013001, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hyndman, R. J. and Koehler, A. B. (2006). “Another look at measures of forecast accuracy.” International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 679–688, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jia, G. W., Zhan, T. L. T., Chen, Y. M., and Fredlund, D. G. (2009). “Performance of a large-scale slope model subjected to rising and lowering water levels.” Engineering Geology, Vol. 106, pp. 92–103, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim, U.-G., Zhuang, L., Kim, D., and Lee, J. (2017). “Evaluation of cyclic shear strength of mixtures with sand and different types of fines.” Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 447–455, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119x.2014.987891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luo, F. and Zhang, G. (2016). “Progressive failure behavior of cohesive soil slopes under water drawdown conditions.” Environmental Earth Sciences, Vol. 75, No. 11, pp. 1–12, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5802-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - A discussion of principles.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 282–290, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. SL 237-021-1999 (1999). Code for test of soil - Direct shear test, The Ministry of Water Resources Beijing, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  15. SL 237-055-1999 (1999). Code for test of soil - Coarse grained soil compaction test, The Ministry of Water Resources China, Beijing, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  16. Tang, A. M., Vu, M. N., and Cui, Y.-J. (2011). “Effects of the maximum soil aggregates size and cyclic wetting–drying on the stiffness of a lime-treated clayey soil.” Géotechnique, Vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 421–429, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tofallis, and Chris. (2015). “A better measure of relative prediction accuracy for model selection and model estimation.” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 66, No. 8, pp. 1352–1362, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.103.
  18. Vallejo, L. E. (2001). “Interpretation of the limits in shear strength in binary granular mixtures.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 38, pp. 1097–1104, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Xu, W.-J., Xu, Q., and Hu, R.-L. (2011). “Study on the shear strength of soil–rock mixture by large scale direct shear test.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 48, No. 8, pp. 1235–1247, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.09.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhao, D. and Qiu, Z.-F. (2016). “Discussion of “shear strength of an accumulation soil from direct shear test” by J. Wang, H. Zhang, H. Wen, and Y. Liang.” Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 194–197, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2014.987892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jun-Jie Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yong-Feng Zhou
    • 3
  • Xiao Wu
    • 1
  • Hui-Ping Zhang
    • 3
  1. 1.Chongqing Engineering Research Center of Diagnosis Technology and Instruments of Hydro-ConstructionChongqing Jiaotong UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.Chongqing Engineering Research Center of Disaster Prevention & Control for Banks and Structures in Three Gorges Reservoir AreaChongqing Three Gorges UniversityChongqingChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of Ministry of EducationChongqing Jiaotong UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations