Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 4675–4686 | Cite as

Empirical Factors for Miniature Cone and T-bar Penetrometers for Kaolin Clay

  • Shemelyn M. Sespeñe
  • Yun Wook ChooEmail author
Geotechnical Engineering
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Undrained shear strength is a key parameter of clay and is popularly determined by penetrometers. Miniature penetrometers are preferred to estimate the undrained shear strength of clay for small-size model tests. In order to estimate undrained shear strength, an empirical factor should be established to correlate the tip resistance to the undrained shear strength. However, published data on miniature penetrometers are limited. This paper aims to evaluate empirical factors on miniature cone and T-bar penetrometers using a cylindrical chamber. Kaolin clay specimens were prepared in the chamber under five pre-consolidation pressures to control their undrained shear strength. Two miniature cones with diameters of 10 mm and 16 mm and a T-bar penetrometer with 10-mm diameter and 40-mm length were used to investigate penetration rate, boundary, and empirical factor. Unconsolidated-undrained triaxial tests and vane shear tests were carried out to measure undrained shear strength. Finally, empirical factors for the penetrometers were constructed to correlate tip resistance to undrained shear strength. The empirical factors established at 20 mm/s of a penetration rate for 10-mm-diameter cone, 16-mm-diameter cone and T-bar penetrometer are 18.33, 13.09 and 12.5, respectively.

Keywords

miniature T-bar penetrometer miniature cone penetrometer empirical factor undrained shear strength kaolin clay 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the research grant of the Kongju National University in 2018.

References

  1. Ajmera, B., Tiwari, B., and Shrestha, D. (2012). “Effect of mineral composition and shearing rates on the undrained shear strength of expansive clays.” Proceedings of the 2012 GeoCongress, Oakland, CA, USA, pp. 1185–1194, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412121.122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida, M. S., Oliveira, J. R., Rammah, K. I., and Trejo, P. C. (2013). “Investigation of bearing capacity factor of T-bar penetrometer at shallow depths in clayey soils.” Journal of Geo-Engineering Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1–12, DOI: 10.3233/JGS-13005.Google Scholar
  3. Bolton, M. D. and Gui, M. W. (1993). The study of relative density and boundary effects for cone penetration tests in centrifuge, Report No. CUED/D-SOILS/TR256, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Chung, S. F. and Randolph, M. F. (2004). “Penetration resistance in soft clay for different shaped penetrometers.” In Proc. 2nd International Conference on Site Characterisation, Porto, Portugal, Vol. 1, pp. 671–678.Google Scholar
  5. DeJong, J. T., Yafrate, N. J., and DeGroot, D. J. (2011). “Evaluation of undrained shear strength using full-flow penetrometers.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering, Vol. 137, No. 1, pp. 14–26, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eid, H. T. and Stark, T. D. (1998). “Undrained shear strength from cone penetration test.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Site Characterization-ISC, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 1021–1025.Google Scholar
  7. Einav, I. and Randolph, M. F. (2005). “Combining upper bound and strain path method for evaluating penetration resistance.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 63, No. 14, pp. 1991–2016, DOI: 10.1002/nme.1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Finnie, I. M. and Randolph, M. F. (1994). “Bearing response of shallow foundations in uncemented calcareous soil.” In Proc., Int. Conf. Centrifuge, Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, pp. 535–540.Google Scholar
  9. Gui, M. W. and Bolton, M. D. (1998). “Geometry and scale effects in CPT and pile design.” Geotechnical Site Characterization, Vol. 2, pp. 1063–1068.Google Scholar
  10. House, A. R., Oliveira, J. R. M. S., and Randolph, M. F. (2001). “Evaluating the coefficient of consolidation using penetration tests.” International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 17–26, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2001.010302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim, J. H., Choo, Y. W., Kim, D. J., and Kim, D. S. (2015). “Miniature cone tip resistance on sand in a centrifuge.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering, Vol. 142, No. 3, p. 04015090, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001425.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim, K., Prezzi, M., Salgado, R., and Lee, W. (2008). “Effect of penetration rate on cone penetration resistance in saturated clayey soils.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering, Vol. 134, No. 8, pp. 1142–1153, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:8(1142).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kjekstad, O., Lunne, T., and Clausen, C. J. (1978). “Comparison between in situ cone resistance and laboratory strength for overconsolidated North Sea clays.” Marine Geo-resources & Geotechnology, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 23–36, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/10641197809379792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lima, D. C. D. and Tumay, M. T. (1991). “Scale effects in cone penetration tests.” In Geotechnical Engineering Congress, ASCE, Boulder, CO, USA, pp. 38–51.Google Scholar
  15. Lunne, T., Andersen, K. H., Low, H. E., Randolph, M. F., and Sjursen, M. (2011). “Guidelines for offshore in situ testing and interpretation in deepwater soft clays.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 543–556, DOI: 10.1139/t10-088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lunne, T., Randolph, M. F., Chung, S. F., Andersen, K. H., and Sjursen, M. (2005). “Comparison of cone and T-bar factors in two onshore and one offshore clay sediments.” In Proceedings of the InternationalSymposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, Perth, Australia, pp. 19–21.Google Scholar
  17. Nanda, S., Sivakumar, V., Hoyer, P., Bradshaw, A., Gavin, K. G., Gerkus, H., and Fanning, J. (2017). “Effects of strain rates on the undrained shear strength of kaolin.” Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 951–962, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20160101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pooley, E. J. (2015). Centrifuge modelling of ground improvement for double porosity clay, PhD Dissertation, Institute of Geotechnical Engineering (IGT), ETH Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  19. Powell, J. J. M. and Quarterman, R. S. T. (1988). “The interpretation of cone penetration tests in clays, with particular reference to rate effects.” Penetration Testing 1988, Vol. 2, pp. 903–909.Google Scholar
  20. Randolph, M. F. (2004). “Characterization of soft sediments for offshore applications.” Proc. ISC-2 on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization, Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  21. Randolph, M. F. and Hope, S. (2004). “Effect of cone velocity on cone resistance and excess pore pressures.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Engineering Practice and Performance of Soft Deposits, Toyonaka, Japan, pp. 147–152.Google Scholar
  22. Rocha Filho, P. and Alencar, J. A. (1985). “Piezocone tests in the Rio de Janeiro soft clay deposit.” Proc., 11th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Found Eng., A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, San Francisco, CA, USA, Vol. 2, pp. 859–862.Google Scholar
  23. Sweeney, B. (1987). Liquefaction evaluation using a miniature cone penetrometer and a scale calibration chamber, PhD Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Tani, K. and Craig, W. (1995). “Bearing capacity of circular foundations on soft clay of strength increasing with depth.” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 21–35, DOI: 10.3208/sandf.35.4_21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tumay, M. T., Kurup, P. U., and Boggess, R. L. (1998). “A continuous intrusion electronic miniature cone penetration test system for site characterization.” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Site Characterization-ISC, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 1183–1188.Google Scholar
  26. Weemees, I., Howie, J., Woeller, D., Sharp, J., Cargill, E., and Greig, J. (2006). “Improved techniques for in situ determination of undrained shear strength in soft clays.” In Sea to Sky Geotechnics, Proceedings of the 59th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  27. Yafrate, N. J., DeJong, J. T., DeGroot, D. J., and Randolph, M. F. (2009). “Evaluation of remolded shear strength and sensitivity of soft clay using full-flow penetrometers.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 135, No. 9, pp. 1179–1189, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zein, A. K. M. (2017). “Estimation of undrained shear strength of fine-grained soils from cone penetration resistance.” International Journal of Geo-Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 1, 9, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-017-0046-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Civil and Environmental EngineeringKongju National UniversityCheonanKorea
  2. 2.Dept. of Civil and Environmental EngineeringKongju National UniversityCheonanKorea

Personalised recommendations