Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 4662–4674 | Cite as

Effect of Grain Gradation on the Permeability Characteristics of Coarse-grained Soil Conditioned with Foam for EPB Shield Tunneling

  • Shuo Huang
  • Shuying WangEmail author
  • Changjie Xu
  • Yufeng Shi
  • Fei Ye
Geotechnical Engineering

Abstract

To avoid water spewing out of the screw conveyor, foam is often used to reduce the permeability coefficient of the soil during earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunneling. Whether foam can effectively reduce the permeability or not strongly depends on soil gradation characteristics. A series of permeability tests were carried out on foam-conditioned soil with changing effective grain size (d10), curvature coefficient (Cc), and uniformity coefficient (Cu), further, three characteristic times were defined to evaluate the permeation safety of the conditioned soil, including critical time (tc), flow rate safety time (ta) and flow quantity safety time (ts). The test results show that with an increase in d10, the initial permeability coefficient of the conditioned soil increased greatly, however, it only changed slightly with increases in Cc and Cu. In addition, permeability coefficient was still much lower than that of the unconditioned soil, even though entered the slow growth period for a long time. It is shown that as the Cc and Cu increased, the ta and ts changed slightly, however, as the d10 increased, the ta and ts decreased significantly. The results indicate that d10 can greatly affect the permeability characteristics of conditioned soil, more specifically, the initial permeability coefficient and the permeation safety. By contrast, Cc and Cu have less effects. In addition, it is not reasonable to consider that the permeability coefficient of the conditioned soil will reach or be close to that of unconditioned soil when most, or all, of foam in the foam-conditioned soil dissipates.

Keywords

foam soil conditioning EPB shield permeability grain gradation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51778637) and National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFB1201204) is acknowledged and appreciated. The authors are also grateful for the recommendations from Xibao Zhang and Zhenyu Gong in China Railway No. 5 Engineering Group Co., LTD.

References

  1. Alyamani, M. S. and Sen, Z. (1993). “Determination of hydraulic conductivity from complete grain-size distribution curves.” Ground Water, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 551–555, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(94)92939-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM (2006). Standard test method for permeability of granular soils (constant head), D2434-68, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1520/D2434-68R06.Google Scholar
  3. ASTM (2009). Standard practice for description and identification of soils, D2488-09, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1520/d2488-09.Google Scholar
  4. Bernard, G. G. and Holm, L. (1964). “Effect of foam on permeability of porous media to gas.” Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 267–274, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2118/983-pa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bezuijen, A. (2005). “The influence of soil permeability on the properties of a foam mixture in a TBM.” In Tunneling. A Decade of Progress. GeoDelft 1995–2005, CRC Press, pp. 50–57, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439834268.ch6.Google Scholar
  6. Bezuijen, A. (2012). “Foam used during EPB tunneling in saturated sand, parameters determining foam consumption.” Proc., WWTC 2012, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 267–269.Google Scholar
  7. Bezuijen, A., Schaminee, P. E. L., and Kleinjan, J. A. (1999). “Additive testing for earth pressure balance shields.” Proc. 12th Eur. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Eng., Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 1991–1996.Google Scholar
  8. Borio, L. and Peila, D. (2010). “Study of the permeability of foam conditioned soils with laboratory tests.” American Journal of Environmental Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 365–370, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2010.365.370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Budach, C. (2012). Untersuchungen zum erweiterten Einsatz von Erddruckschilden in grobkörnigem Lockergestein [Investigations for extended use of EPB Shields in coarse-grained soils], Ph.D. Thesis, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (in German).Google Scholar
  10. Budach, C. and Thewes, M. (2015). “Application ranges of EPB shields in coarse ground based on laboratory research.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 50, pp. 296–304, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EFNARC (2005). Specifications and guidelines for the use of specialist products for mechanized tunnelling (TBM) in Soft ground and hard rock, recommendation, Farnham, UK, http://www.efnarc.org/publications.html.
  12. Hajialilue-Bonab, M., Sabetamal, H., and Bezuijen, A. (2014). “Experimental study on foamed sandy soil for EPBM tunneling.” Advances in Railway Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 27–40, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203879986.ch36.Google Scholar
  13. Hazen, A. (1892). “Some physical properties of sands and gravels, with special reference to their use in filtration.” 24th Annual Report, Massachusetts State Board of Health, Pub. Doc. No. 34, pp. 539–556.Google Scholar
  14. Huang, J. and Sun, Q. (2007). “Advances in the mechanism of liquid foam percolation.” Advances in Mechanics, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 269–278, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.6052/1000-0992-2007-2-J2006-007 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  15. Kim, T. H., Kim, B. K., Lee, K. H., and Lee, I. M. (2019). “Soil conditioning of weathered granite soil used for EPB Shield TBM: A laboratory scale study.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 1829–1838, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1484-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, P., Wang, S., Ge, L., Thewes, M., Yang, J., and Xia, Y. (2018). “Changes of Atterberg limits and electrochemical behaviors of clays with dispersants as conditioning agents for EPB shield tunneling.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 73, pp. 244–251, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.12.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu, P., Wang, S., Shi, Y., Yang, J., Fu, J., and Yang, F. (2019). “Tangential adhesion strength between clay and steel for various soil softnesses.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 5, p. 04019048, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mori, L., Alavi, E., and Mooney, M. (2017). “Apparent density evaluation methods to assess the effectiveness of soil conditioning.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 67, pp. 175–186, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nagy, L. (2011). “Permeability of well graded soils.” Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 199–204, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.ci.2011-2.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Onur, E. M. and Shakoor, A. (2015). “Relationships between grain size distribution indexes and permeability of sands.” Engineering Geology for Society and Territory, Vol. 3, pp. 287–290, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09054-259.Google Scholar
  21. Peila, D. (2014). “Soil conditioning for EPB shield tunneling.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 831–836, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0023-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Psomas, S. (2001). Properties of foam/sand mixtures for tunneling applications, MSc Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Qiao, G. (2009). Development of new foam agent for EPB shield machine and foamed-soil modification, PhD Thesis, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  24. Qu, T., Wang, S., Fu, J., Hu, Q., and Zhang, X. (2019). “Numerical examination of EPB shield tunneling-induced responses at various discharge ratios.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 33, No. 3, p. 04019035, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Quebaud, S., Sibai, M., and Henry, J. P. (1998). “Use of chemical foam for improvements in drilling by earth-pressure balanced shields in granular soils.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 173–180, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00045-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., and Mesri, G. (1964). Soil mechanics in engineering practice, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Wiebenga, W. A., Ellis, W. R., and Kevi, L. (1970). “Empirical relations in properties of unconsolidated quartz sands and silts pertaining to water flow.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 1154–1161, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1029/wr006i004p01154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhu, W., Qin, J., and Wei, K. (2004). “Research on the mechanism of the spewing in the EPB shield tunneling.” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 589–593, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2004.05.003 (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuo Huang
    • 1
  • Shuying Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Changjie Xu
    • 2
  • Yufeng Shi
    • 2
  • Fei Ye
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.School of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureEast China Jiaotong UniversityNanchangChina
  3. 3.School of HighwayChang’an UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations