Effect of Grain Gradation on the Permeability Characteristics of Coarse-grained Soil Conditioned with Foam for EPB Shield Tunneling
- 48 Downloads
To avoid water spewing out of the screw conveyor, foam is often used to reduce the permeability coefficient of the soil during earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunneling. Whether foam can effectively reduce the permeability or not strongly depends on soil gradation characteristics. A series of permeability tests were carried out on foam-conditioned soil with changing effective grain size (d10), curvature coefficient (Cc), and uniformity coefficient (Cu), further, three characteristic times were defined to evaluate the permeation safety of the conditioned soil, including critical time (tc), flow rate safety time (ta) and flow quantity safety time (ts). The test results show that with an increase in d10, the initial permeability coefficient of the conditioned soil increased greatly, however, it only changed slightly with increases in Cc and Cu. In addition, permeability coefficient was still much lower than that of the unconditioned soil, even though entered the slow growth period for a long time. It is shown that as the Cc and Cu increased, the ta and ts changed slightly, however, as the d10 increased, the ta and ts decreased significantly. The results indicate that d10 can greatly affect the permeability characteristics of conditioned soil, more specifically, the initial permeability coefficient and the permeation safety. By contrast, Cc and Cu have less effects. In addition, it is not reasonable to consider that the permeability coefficient of the conditioned soil will reach or be close to that of unconditioned soil when most, or all, of foam in the foam-conditioned soil dissipates.
Keywordsfoam soil conditioning EPB shield permeability grain gradation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51778637) and National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFB1201204) is acknowledged and appreciated. The authors are also grateful for the recommendations from Xibao Zhang and Zhenyu Gong in China Railway No. 5 Engineering Group Co., LTD.
- Bezuijen, A. (2012). “Foam used during EPB tunneling in saturated sand, parameters determining foam consumption.” Proc., WWTC 2012, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 267–269.Google Scholar
- Bezuijen, A., Schaminee, P. E. L., and Kleinjan, J. A. (1999). “Additive testing for earth pressure balance shields.” Proc. 12th Eur. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Eng., Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 1991–1996.Google Scholar
- Budach, C. (2012). Untersuchungen zum erweiterten Einsatz von Erddruckschilden in grobkörnigem Lockergestein [Investigations for extended use of EPB Shields in coarse-grained soils], Ph.D. Thesis, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (in German).Google Scholar
- EFNARC (2005). Specifications and guidelines for the use of specialist products for mechanized tunnelling (TBM) in Soft ground and hard rock, recommendation, Farnham, UK, http://www.efnarc.org/publications.html.
- Hazen, A. (1892). “Some physical properties of sands and gravels, with special reference to their use in filtration.” 24th Annual Report, Massachusetts State Board of Health, Pub. Doc. No. 34, pp. 539–556.Google Scholar
- Huang, J. and Sun, Q. (2007). “Advances in the mechanism of liquid foam percolation.” Advances in Mechanics, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 269–278, DOI: https://doi.org/10.6052/1000-0992-2007-2-J2006-007 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Liu, P., Wang, S., Ge, L., Thewes, M., Yang, J., and Xia, Y. (2018). “Changes of Atterberg limits and electrochemical behaviors of clays with dispersants as conditioning agents for EPB shield tunneling.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 73, pp. 244–251, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.12.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu, P., Wang, S., Shi, Y., Yang, J., Fu, J., and Yang, F. (2019). “Tangential adhesion strength between clay and steel for various soil softnesses.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 5, p. 04019048, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Psomas, S. (2001). Properties of foam/sand mixtures for tunneling applications, MSc Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Qiao, G. (2009). Development of new foam agent for EPB shield machine and foamed-soil modification, PhD Thesis, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Qu, T., Wang, S., Fu, J., Hu, Q., and Zhang, X. (2019). “Numerical examination of EPB shield tunneling-induced responses at various discharge ratios.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 33, No. 3, p. 04019035, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Quebaud, S., Sibai, M., and Henry, J. P. (1998). “Use of chemical foam for improvements in drilling by earth-pressure balanced shields in granular soils.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 173–180, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00045-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., and Mesri, G. (1964). Soil mechanics in engineering practice, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.Google Scholar
- Zhu, W., Qin, J., and Wei, K. (2004). “Research on the mechanism of the spewing in the EPB shield tunneling.” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 589–593, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2004.05.003 (in Chinese).Google Scholar