Advertisement

Deformable Registration of Chest Radiographs Using B-spline Based Method with Modified Residual Complexity

  • Zhikang Xiang (相志康)
  • Min Li (李敏)Email author
  • Liang Xiao (肖亮)
  • Zhichao Lian (练智超)
  • Zhihui Wei (韦志辉)
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Accurate registration of chest radiographs plays an increasingly important role in medical applications. However, most current intensity-based registration methods rely on the assumption of intensity conservation that is not suitable for alignment of chest radiographs. In this study, we propose a novel algorithm to match chest radiographs, for which the conventional residual complexity (RC) is modified as the similarity measure and the cubic B-spline transformation is adopted for displacement estimation. The modified similarity measure is allowed to incorporate the neighborhood influence into variation of intensity in a justified manner of the weight, while the transformation is implemented with a registration framework of pyramid structure. The results show that the proposed algorithm is more accurate in registration of chest radiographs, compared with some widely used methods such as the sum-of-squared-differences (SSD), correlation coefficient (CC) and mutual information (MI) algorithms, as well as the conventional RC approaches.

Key words

deformable registration chest radiograph residual complexity (RC) B-spline 

CLC number

TP 399 

Document code

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    ISHIDA T, KATSURAGAWA S, NAKAMURA K, et al. Iterative image warping technique for temporal subtraction of sequential chest radiographs to detect interval change [J]. Medical Physics, 1999, 26(7): 1320–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    LI M, CASTILLO E, LUO H Y, et al. Deformable image registration for temporal subtraction of chest radiographs [J]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology & Surgery, 2014, 9(4): 513–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    HILL D L G, BATCHELOR P G, HOLDEN M, et al. Medical image registration [J]. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2001, 46(3): 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    ZITOVA B, FLUSSER J. Image registration methods: A survey [J]. Image and Vision Computing, 2003, 21(11): 977–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    HARRIS C G, STEPHENS M. A combined corner and edge detector [C]// Proceedings of the 4th Alvey Vision Conference. Alvey, UK: [s.n.], 1988: 147–151.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    SMITH S M, BRADY J M. SUSAN: A new approach to low level image processing [J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1997, 23(1): 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    MORADI M, ABOLMAESUMI P. Medical image registration based on distinctive image features from scale-invariant (SIFT) key-points [J]. International Congress Series, 2005, 1281: 1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    SANG Q, ZHANG J Z, YU Z Y. Robust non-rigid point registration based on feature-dependant finite mixture model [J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2013, 34(13): 1557–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    CRUM W R, HARTKENS T, HILL D L G. Nonrigid image registration: Theory and practice [J]. The British Journal of Radiology, 2004, 77(Sup 2): 140–153.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    BROIT C. Optimal registration of deformed images [J]. Acta Obstetrica Et Gynaecologica Japonica, 1981, 39(4): 556–562.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    CHRISTENSEN G E, RABBITT R D, MILLER M I. Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 1996, 5(10): 1435–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    THIRION J P. Image matching as a diffusion process: An analogy with Maxwell’s demons [J]. Medical Image Analysis, 1998, 2(3): 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    YANG J, WANG Y T, TANG S Y, et al. Multiresolution elastic registration of X-ray angiography images using thin-plate spline [J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2007, 54(1): 152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    MYRONENKO A, SONG X B. Intensity-based image registration by minimizing residual complexity [J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2010, 29(11): 1882–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    NOCEDAL J, WRIGHT S J. Numerical optimization [M]. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    KLEIN S, STARING M, PLUIM J P W. Evaluation of optimization methods for nonrigid medical image registration using mutual information and B-splines [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2007, 16(12): 2879–2890.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    PENNEY G P, WEESE J, LITTLE J A, et al. A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2D-3D medical image registration [C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1998: 1153–1161.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    STRANG G. The discrete cosine transform [J]. SIAM Review, 1999, 41(1): 135–147.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    BROWN L G. A survey of image registration techniques [J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 1992, 24(4): 325–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    MAES F, COLLIGNON A, VANDERMEULEN D, et al. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information [J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1997, 16(2): 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    CHEN Z, HAYKIN S. On different facets of regularization theory [J]. Neural Computation, 2002, 14(12): 2791–2846.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    RUECKERT D, SONODA L I, HAYES C, et al. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images [J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1999, 18(8): 712–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    HOLDEN M. A review of geometric transformations for nonrigid body registration [J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2008, 27(1): 111–128.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhikang Xiang (相志康)
    • 1
  • Min Li (李敏)
    • 1
    Email author
  • Liang Xiao (肖亮)
    • 1
  • Zhichao Lian (练智超)
    • 1
  • Zhihui Wei (韦志辉)
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations