Advertisement

Residual Chart with Hidden Markov Model to Monitoring the Auto-Correlated Processes

  • Yaping Li (李亚平)Email author
  • Mengdie Huang (黄梦蝶)
  • Ershun Pan (潘尔顺)
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Autocorrelations exist in real production extensively, and special statistical tools are needed for process monitoring. Residual charts based on autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models are typically used. However, ARIMA models need a quite amount of experience, which sometimes causes inconveniences in the implementation. With a good performance under less experience or even none, hidden Markov models (HMMs) were proposed. Since ARIMA models have many different performances in positive and negative autocorrelations, it is interesting and essential to study how HMMs affect the performances of residual charts in opposite autocorrelations, which has not been studied yet. Therefore, we extend HMMs to negatively auto-correlated observations. The cross-validation method is used to select the relatively optimal state number. The experiment results show that HMMs are more stable than Auto-Regressive of order one (AR(1) models) in both cases of positive and negative autocorrelations. For detecting abnormalities, the performance of HMMs approach is much better than AR(1) models under positive autocorrelations while under negative autocorrelations both methods have similar performances.

Key words

auto-correlations hidden Markov models statistical process control 

CLC number

F 273 

Document code

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    BERTHOUEX P M, HUNTER W G, PALLESEN L. Monitoring sewage treatment plants: Some quality control aspects [J]. Journal of Quality Technology, 1978, 10(4): 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    MONTGOMERY D C, MASTRANGELO C M. Some statistical process control methods for autocorrelated data [J]. Journal of Quality Technology, 1991, 23(3): 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    MARAGAH H D, WOODALL W H. The effect of autocorrelation on the retrospective X-chart [J]. Journal of Statistical Computation & Simulation, 1992, 40(1/2): 29–42.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    MONTGOMERY D C. Statistical quality control: A modern introduction [M]. 6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    VASILOPOULOS A V, STAMBOULIS A P. Modification of control chart limits in the presence of data correlation [J]. Journal of Quality Technology, 1978, 10(1): 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    WARDELL D G, MOSKOWITZ H, PLANTE R D. Control charts in the presence of data correlation [J]. Management Science, 1992, 38(8): 1084–1105.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    JIANG W, TSUI K L, WOODALL W H. A new SPC monitoring method: The ARMA chart [J]. Technometrics, 2000, 42(4): 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    LU C W, REYNOLDS M R Jr. CUSUM charts for monitoring an autocorrelated process [J]. Journal of Quality Technology, 2001, 33(3): 316–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    YASHCHIN E. Performance of CUSUM control schemes for serially correlated observations [J]. Technometrics, 1993, 35(1): 37–52.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    CASTAGLIOLA P, TSUNG F. Autocorrelated SPC for non-normal situations [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2005, 21 (2): 131–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    SCHMID W. On the run length of a Shewhart chart for correlated data [J]. Statistical Papers, 1995, 36(2): 111–130.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    GARZA-VENEGAS J A, TERCERO-GOMEZ V G, HO LEE L, et al. Effect of autocorrelation estimators on the performance of the ¯X -control chart [J]. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 2018, 88(13): 2612–2630.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    YANG S F, YANG C M. An approach to controlling two dependent process steps with autocorrelated observations [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2006, 29(1): 170–177.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    DAVOODI M, NIAKI S T A. Estimating the stepchange time of the location parameter in multistage processes using MLE [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2012, 28: 843–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    PAN J N, LI C I, WU J J. A new approach to detecting the process changes for multistage systems [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2016, 62: 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    MASTRANGELO C M, MONTGOMERY D C. SPC with correlated observations for the chemical and process industries [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 1995, 11 (2): 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    LU C W, REYNOLDS M R Jr. EWMA control charts for monitoring the mean of autocorrelated processes [J]. Journal of Quality Technology, 1999, 31(2): 166–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    ALWAN L C, ROBERTS H V. Time-series modeling for statistical process control [J]. Journal of Business & Economics Statistics, 1988, 6(1): 87–95.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    MONTGOMERY D C, MASTRANGELO C M. Some statistical process control methods for autocorrelated data [J]. Journal of Quality Technology, 1991, 23 (3): 200–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    WARDELL D G, MOSKOWITZ H, PLANTE R D. Run-length distributions of special-cause control charts for correlated processes [J]. Technometrics, 1994, 36(1): 3–17.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    ZHANG N F. Detection capability of residual control chart for stationary process data [J]. Journal of Applied Statistics, 1997, 24(4): 475–492.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    VANHATALO E, KULAHCI M. The effect of autocorrelation on the Hotelling T 2 control chart [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2015, 31(8): 1779–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    CHIU C C, CHEN M K, LEE K M. Shifts recognition in correlated process data using a neural network [J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2001, 32(2): 137–143.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    ARKAT J, NIAKI S T A, ABBASI B. Artificial neural networks in applying MCUSUM residuals charts for AR(1) processes [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2007, 189(2): 1889–1901.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    PACELLA M, SEMERARO Q. Using recurrent neural networks to detect changes in autocorrelated processes for quality monitoring [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2007, 52(4): 502–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    CAMARGO M E, FILHO W P, RUSSO S L, et al. Control charts for monitoring autocorrelated processes based on neural networks model [C]//International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering. Troyes, France: IEEE, 2009: 1881–1884.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    YU J L, HAN Y, MIAO M X, et al. Self-related process residual control chart based on neural network [C]//International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling. London, UK: Atlantis Press, 2015: 41–43.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    YANG H H, HUANG M L, YANG S W. Integrating auto-associative neural networks with Hotelling T 2 control charts for wind turbine fault detection [J]. Energies, 2015, 8: 12100–12115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    RAI A, UPADHYAY S H. The use of MD-CUMSUM and NARX neural network for anticipating the remaining useful life of bearings [J]. Measurement, 2017, 111: 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    ALSHRAIDEH H, RUNGER G. Process monitoring using hidden Markov models [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2015, 30(8): 1379–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    ROSS S M. Introduction to probability models [M]. 11th ed. Beijing: Posts & Telecom Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    CHEN Z, XIA T B, LI Y P, et al. Degradation modeling and classification of mixed populations using segmental continuous hidden Markov models [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2018, 34(5): 807–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Jiaotong University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yaping Li (李亚平)
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mengdie Huang (黄梦蝶)
    • 2
  • Ershun Pan (潘尔顺)
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Economics and ManagementNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations