Advertisement

Opportunistic Replacement Optimization for Multi-Component System Based on Programming Theory

  • Lei Xiao (肖雷)Email author
  • Tangbin Xia (夏唐斌)
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

It is widely accepted that too excessive or too insufficient maintenance actions on a system are consumptive or potentially risky. This paper focuses on the optimization of opportunistic replacement for a multicomponent system in which no failure or suspension histories can be used for prediction of all the critical components in the system. Firstly, the remaining useful life (RUL) is predicted using the real-time sensor data, which is based on an “individual-based lifetime inference” method. Then a failure risk estimation method is introduced, which is based on the degradation extent and service time of components. Subsequently, the possible replacement combinations of components are compared, which is based on a proposed current-term cost rate. Finally, the best replacement scheduling is selected. The proposed framework is validated by the simulation dataset and PHM-2012 competition bearing dataset. Group replacement and individual replacement are conducted for comparison, and sensitivity analysis is discussed.

Key words

remaining useful life (RUL) prediction opportunistic replacement cost rate long task horizon 

CLC number

TH 16 TP 207 

Document code

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    JARDINE A K S, LIN D M, BANJEVIC D. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006, 20(7): 1483–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    XIA T B, DONG Y F, XIAO L, et al. Recent advances in prognostics and health management for advanced manufacturing paradigms [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2018, 178: 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    BARALDI P, MAIO F D, AL-DAHIDI S, et al. Prediction of industrial equipment remaining useful life by fuzzy similarity and belief function theory [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 83: 226–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    AL-DAHIDI S, MAIO F D, BARALDI P, et al. Remaining useful life estimation in heterogeneous fleets working under variable operating conditions [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2016, 156: 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    TIAN Z G, WONG L, SAFAEI N. A neural network approach for remaining useful life prediction utilizing both failure and suspension histories [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2010, 24(5): 1542–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    TAO F L, YANG C, CHENG Y J, et al. Machine component health prognostics with only truncated histories using geometrical metric approach [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2018, 113: 168–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    WANG D, YANG F F, TSUI K L, et al. Remaining useful life prediction of lithiumion batteries based on spherical cubature particle filter [J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2016, 65(6): 1282–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    SI X S. An adaptive prognostic approach via nonlinear degradation modeling: Application to battery data [J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2015, 62(8): 5082–5096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    XIAO L, CHEN X H, ZHANG X H, et al. A novel approach for bearing remaining useful life estimation under neither failure nor suspension histories condition [J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2017, 28(8): 1893–1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    TIAN Z G, JIN T D, WU B R, et al. Condition based maintenance optimization for wind power generation systems under continuous monitoring [J]. Renewable Energy, 2011, 36(5): 1502–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    XIAO L, SONG S L, CHEN X H, et al. Joint optimization of production scheduling and machine group preventive maintenance [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2016, 146: 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    SHAFIEE M, FINKELSTEIN M, BÉRENGUER C. An opportunistic condition-based maintenance policy for offshore wind turbine blades subjected to degradation and environmental shocks [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2015, 142: 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    XIA T B, TAO X Y, XI L F. Operation process rebuilding (OPR)-oriented maintenance policy for changeable system structures [J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2017, 14(1): 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    ZHANG C, GAO W, GUO S, et al. Opportunistic maintenance for wind turbines considering imperfect, reliability-based maintenance [J]. Renewable Energy, 2017, 103: 606–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    SARKER B R, FAIZ T I. Minimizing maintenance cost for offshore wind turbines following multi-level opportunistic preventive strategy [J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 85: 104–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    ABDOLLAHZADEH H, ATASHGAR K, ABBASI M. Multi-objective opportunistic maintenance optimization of a wind farm considering limited number of maintenance groups [J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 88: 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    YILDIRI M M, GEBRAEEL N Z, SUN X A. Integrated predictive analytics and optimization for opportunistic maintenance and operations in wind farms [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2017, 32(6): 4319–4328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    VERBERT K, SCHUTTER B D, BABUˇSKA R. Timely condition-based maintenance planning for multi-component systems [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2017, 159: 310–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    ZHANG X H, KANG J S, JIN T D. Degradation modeling and maintenance decisions based on Bayesian Belief Networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2014, 63(2): 620–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    NECTOUX P, GOURIVEAU R, MEDJAHER K, et al. PRONOSTIA: An experimental platform for bearings accelerated degradation tests [C]//IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management. Denver, Colorado, USA: IEEE, 2012: 1–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Jiaotong University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mechanical EngineeringDonghua UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations