Advertisement

Study on Oxidation Activity of CuCeZrOx Doped with K for Diesel Engine Particles in NO/O2

  • Kexin Wang (王可欣)
  • Bin Guan (管斌)
  • Ke Li (李珂)
  • Rijing Zhan (湛日景)
  • He Lin (林赫)
  • Zhen Huang (黄震)
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

CuCeZrOx and KCuCeZrOx catalysts were synthesized and coated on the blank diesel particulate filter (DPF) substrate and a particulate matter (PM) loading apparatus was used for soot loading. The catalytic performances of soot oxidation were evaluated by temperature programmed combustion (TPC) test and characterization tests were conducted to investigate the physicochemical properties of the catalysts. The reaction mechanism in the oxidation process was analyzed with diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy. The results demonstrated that CuCeZrOx catalyst exhibited high activities of soot oxidation at low temperature and the best results have been attained with Cu0.9Ce0.05Zr0.05Ox over which the maximum soot oxidation rate decreased to 410 °C. Characterization tests have shown that catalysts containing 90% Cu have uniformly distributed grains and small particle sizes, which provide excellent oxidation activity by providing more active sites and forming a good bond between the catalyst and the soot. The low-temperature oxidation activity of soot could be further optimized due to the excellent elevated NO’s conversion rate by partially substituting Cu with K. The maximum particle oxidation rate can be easily realized at such a low temperature as 347°C.

Key words

self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) Mn and Ce substitution low temperature activity N2 selectivity H2O and SO2 poisoning in situ diffused reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) 

CLC number

TK 421.5 

Document code

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    AISSAT A, SIFFERT S, COURCOT D. Investigation of Cs–Cu/ZrO2 systems for simultaneous NOx reduction and carbonaceous particles oxidation [J]. Catalysis Today, 2012, 191: 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    ANEGGI E, BOARO M, LEITENBURG C D, et al. Insights into the redox properties of ceria-based oxides and their implications in catalysis [J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2006, 408/409/410/411/412: 1096–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    ANEGGI E, LEITENBURG C D, LLORCA J, et al. Higher activity of Diesel soot oxidation over polycrystalline ceria and ceria–zirconia solid solutions from more reactive surface planes [J]. Catalysis Today, 2012, 197: 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    BAI S Z, TANG G, WANG G H, et al. Soot loading estimation model and passive regeneration characteristics of DPF system for heavy-duty engine [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 100: 1292–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    BECERRA M E, ARIAS N P, GIRALDO O H, et al. Soot combustion manganese catalysts prepared by thermal decomposition of KMnO4 [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2011, 102: 260–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    ATRIBAK I, BUENO-LOPEZ A, GARCIA-GARCIA A. Combined removal of diesel soot particulates and NOx over CeO2–ZrO2 mixed oxides [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2008, 259: 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    AZAMBRE B, COLLURA S, DARCY P, et al. Effects of a Pt/Ce0.68Zr0.32O2 catalyst and NO2 on the kinetics of diesel soot oxidation from thermogravimetric analyses [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2011, 92: 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    BENAQQA C, GOMINA M, BEUROTTE A, et al. Morphology, physical, thermal and mechanical properties of the constitutive materials of diesel particulate filters [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 62: 599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    BENSAID S, RUSSO N. Low temperature DPF regeneration by delafossite catalysts [J]. Catalysis Today, 2011, 176: 417–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    BRUNEEL E, VAN BRABANT J, LE M T, et al. Deposition of a Cu/Mo/Ce catalyst for diesel soot oxidation on a sintered metal fiber filter with a CeO2 anti corrosion coating [J]. Catalysis Communications, 2012, 25: 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    BUENO-LOPEZ A, KRISHNA K, MAKKEE M, et al. Enhanced soot oxidation by lattice oxygen via La3+-doped CeO2 [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2005, 230: 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    BUENO-LOPEZ A, KRISHNA K, MAKKEE M, et al. Active oxygen from CeO2 and its role in catalysed soot oxidation [J]. Catalysis Letters, 2005, 99(3/4): 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    CHENG L, MEN Y, WANG J G, et al. Crystal facetdependent reactivity of α-Mn2O3 microcrystalline catalyst for soot combustion [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 204: 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    DU W, YIN L B, ZHUO Y Q, et al. Performance of CuOx–neutral Al2O3 sorbents on mercury removal from simulated coal combustion flue gas [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 131: 403–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    BIN F, SONG C L, LV G, et al. Soot low-temperature combustion on Cu–Zr/ZSM-5 catalysts in O2/He and NO/O2/He atmospheres [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34: 2303–2311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    GIMENEZ-MANOGIL J, BUENO-LOPEZ A, GARCIA-GARCIA A. Preparation, characterisation and testing of CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 catalysts for NO oxidation to NO2 and mild temperature diesel soot combustion [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2014, 152/153: 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    CAO J L, WANG Y, ZHANG T Y, et al. Preparation, characterization and catalytic behavior of nanostructured mesoporous CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 catalysts for low-temperature CO oxidation [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2008, 78: 120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    DAS D, LLORCA J, DOMINGUEZ M, et al. Methanol steam reforming behavior of copper impregnated over CeO2–ZrO2 derived from a surfactant assisted coprecipitation route [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(33): 10463–10479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    GALVEZ M E, ASCASO S, SUELVES I, et al. Soot oxidation in the presence of NO over alumina-supported bimetallic catalysts K–Me (Me=Cu, Co, V) [J]. Catalysis Today, 2011, 176: 361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    GROSS M S, ULLA M A, QUERINI C A. Diesel particulate matter combustion with CeO2 as catalyst. Part I: System characterization and reaction mechanism [J]. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2012, 352: 86–94.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    GUO X L, LI J, ZHOU R X. Catalytic performance of manganese doped CuO–CeO2 catalysts for selective oxidation of CO in hydrogen-rich gas [J]. Fuel, 2016, 163: 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    HOSSEINI S A, NIAEI A, SALARI D, et al. Study of correlation between activity and structural properties of Cu-(Cr, Mn and Co)2 nano mixed oxides in VOC combustion [J]. Ceramics International, 2014, 40: 6157–6163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    JEGUIRIM M, TSCHAMBER V, EHRBURGER P. Catalytic effect of platinum on the kinetics of carbon oxidation by NO2 and O2 [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2007, 76: 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    LI H C, LI K Z, WANG H, et al. Soot combustion over Ce1−xFexO2−δ and CeO2/Fe2O3 catalysts: Roles of solid solution and interfacial interactions in the mixed oxides [J]. Applied Surface Science, 2016, 390: 513–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    LI Q, MENG M, DAI F F, et al. Multifunctional hydrotalcite-derived K/MnMgAlO catalysts used for soot combustion, NOx storage and simultaneous soot–NOx removal [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 184: 106–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    LIANG Q, WU X D, WENG D, et al. Oxygen activation on Cu/Mn–Ce mixed oxides and the role in diesel soot oxidation [J]. Catalysis Today, 2008, 139: 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    FINO D, BENSAID S, PIUMETTI M, et al. A review on the catalytic combustion of soot in Diesel particulate filters for automotive applications: From powder catalysts to structured reactors [J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2016, 509: 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    GUAN B, ZHAN R, LIN H, et al. Review of the stateof-the-art of exhaust particulate filter technology in internal combustion engines [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 154: 225–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    JOHANSEN K. Multi-catalytic soot filtration in automotive and marine applications [J]. Catalysis Today, 2015, 258: 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    KONSOLAKIS M, IOAKEIMIDIS Z. Surface/structure functionalization of copper-based catalysts by metal-support and/or metal–metal interactions [J]. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 320: 244–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    KUMAR P A, TANWAR M D, BENSAID S, et al. Soot combustion improvement in diesel particulate filters catalyzed with ceria nanofibers [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 207/208: 258–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    LEE K O, SEONG H, CHOI S M. Detailed analysis of kinetic reactions in soot oxidation by simulated diesel exhaust emissions [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34: 3057–3065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    LIM C B, KUSABA H, EINAGA H, et al. Catalytic performance of supported precious metal catalysts for the combustion of diesel particulate matter [J]. Catalysis Today, 2011, 175: 106–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    LAVERSIN H, COURCOT D, ZHILINSKAYA E A, et al. Study of active species of Cu-K/ZrO2 catalysts involved in the oxidation of soot [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2006, 241: 456–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    WARNER J R, DOBSON D A, SHAH S D, et al. Verification of accelerated PM loading for DPF qualification studies [C]//SAE World Congress & Exhibition. [s.l.]: SAE, 2009: 1–9.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    SETIABUDI A, CHEN J L, MUL G, et al. CeO2 catalysed soot oxidation: The role of active oxygen to accelerate the oxidation conversion [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2004, 51: 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    KÜCÜKKAL M U. Identification, stability, and reactivity of NOx species adsorbed on Titania-supported manganese catalysts [D]. Turkey: Bilkent University, 2001.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    HADJIIVANOV K I. Identification of neutral and charged NxOy surface species by IR spectroscopy [J]. Catalysis Reviews, 2000, 42(1/2): 71–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    HADJIIVANOV K, KNOZINGER H, IVANOVA E, et al. FTIR study of low-temperature CO and 15N2 adsorption on a CaNaY zeolite: Formation of sitespecified Ca2+(CO)3 and Ca2+(15N2)3 complexes [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2001, 3: 2531–2536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    GUGLIELMINOTTI E, BOCCUZZI F. Nitric oxide adsorption and nitric oxide-carbon monoxide interaction on Ru/ZnO catalyst [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1993, 141: 486–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    MARTINEZ-ARIAS A, FERNANDEZ-GARCIA M, HUNGRIA A B, et al. Redox interplay at copper oxide-(Ce, Zr)Ox interfaces: Influence of the presence of NO on the catalytic activity for CO oxidation over CuO/CeZrO4 [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2003, 214: 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Jiaotong University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kexin Wang (王可欣)
    • 1
  • Bin Guan (管斌)
    • 1
  • Ke Li (李珂)
    • 1
  • Rijing Zhan (湛日景)
    • 1
  • He Lin (林赫)
    • 1
  • Zhen Huang (黄震)
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations