Advertisement

Catalytic Combustion of Lean Methane Assisted by Electric Field over Pd/Co3O4 Catalysts at Low Temperature

  • Ke Liu (刘柯)
  • Ke Li (李珂)
  • Dejun Xu (许得隽)
  • He Lin (林赫)
  • Bin Guan (管斌)Email author
  • Ting Chen (陈婷)
  • Zhen Huang (黄震)
Article

Abstract

A series of Pd/Co3O4 catalysts were prepared by Self-Propagating High-Temperature Synthesis (SHS) method in this study, and electric field was applied for catalytic combustion of lean methane over Pd/Co3O4 catalysts at low temperature. When electric field was applied, the catalytic combustion performance of Pd/Co3O4 catalysts was greatly improved, and the application of electric field could reduce the load of active element Pd to some extent while maintaining the same efficiency. Based on experimental tests and the analysis results of X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), H2-temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) and in-situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (in-situ DRIFTS), the mechanism of catalytic oxidation of CH4 over Pd/Co3O4 catalysts in electric field was proposed. The catalytic combustion of CH4 occurs only when the temperature is higher than 250 °C normally, but when electric field was applied, the whole process of CH4 oxidation was promoted significantly and the reaction temperature was reduced. Electric field could promote the reduction of the support Co3O4 to release the lattice oxygen, resulting in the increase of PdOx and the surface chemisorbed oxygen, which could provide more active sites for the low-temperature oxidation of CH4. Furthermore, electric field could accelerate the dehydroxylation of CoOOH to further enhance the activity of the catalysts.

Key words

electric field methane oxidation Pd/Co3O4 catalyst in-situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) mechanism 

CLC number

TK 4 

Document code

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    GOYAL P, SIDHARTHA. Present scenario of air quality in Delhi: A case study of CNG implementation [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37(38): 5423–5431.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    DÍAZ E, FERNÁNDEZ J, ORDÓ ˜NEZ S, et al. Carbon and ecological footprints as tools for evaluating the environmental impact of coal mine ventilation air [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 18: 126–130.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    FINO D, RUSSO N, SARACCO G, et al. Supported Pd-perovskite catalyst for CNG engines’ exhaust gas treatment [J]. Progress in Solid State Chemistry, 2007, 35(2): 501–511.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    YOSHIDA H, NAKAJIMA T, YAZAWA Y, et al. Support effect on methane combustion over palladium catalysts [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2007, 71(1): 70–79.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    COLUSSI S, TROVARELLI A, CRISTIANI C, et al. The influence of ceria and other rare earth promoters on palladium-based methane combustion catalysts [J]. Catalysis Today, 2012, 180(1): 124–130.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    YUE B H, ZHOU R X, WANG Y J, et al. Study of the methane combustion and TPR/TPO properties of Pd/Ce–Zr–M/Al2O3, catalysts with M=Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba [J]. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2005, 238(1): 241–249.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    SHEN J, HAYES R E, WU X X, et al. 100 º Temperature reduction of wet methane combustion: Highly active Pd–Ni/Al2O3 catalyst versus Pd/NiAl2O4 [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2015, 5: 2916–2920.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    LIOTTA L F, CARLO G D, PANTALEO G, et al. Honeycomb supported Co3O4/CeO2 catalyst for CO/CH4 emissions abatement: Effect of low Pd–Pt content on the catalytic activity [J]. Catalysis Communications, 2007, 8(3): 299–304.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    YUE B H, ZHOU R X, WANG Y J, et al. Effect of rare earths (La, Pr, Nd, Sm and Y) on the methane combustion over Pd/Ce–Zr/Al2O3 catalysts [J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2005, 295(1): 31–39.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    CHENAKIN S P, MELAET G, SZUKIEWICZ R, et al. XPS study of the surface chemical state of a Pd/(SiO2+TiO2) catalyst after methane oxidation and SO2, treatment [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2014, 312(2): 1–11.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    GUO X N, ZHI G J, YAN X Y, et al. Methane combustion over Pd/ZrO2/SiC, Pd/CeO2/SiC, and Pd/Zr0.5Ce0.5O2/SiC catalysts [J]. Catalysis Communications, 2011, 12(10): 870–874.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    STROBEL R, GRUNWALDT J D, CAMENZIND A, et al. Flame-made alumina supported Pd–Pt nanoparticles: Structural properties and catalytic behavior in methane combustion [J]. Catalysis Letters, 2005, 104(1/2): 9–16.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    SPECCHIA S, CONTI F, SPECCHIA V. Kinetic studies on Pd/CexZr1−xO2 catalyst for methane combustion [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(21): 11101–11111.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    OSHIMA K, SHINAGAWA T, NOGAMI Y, et al. Low temperature catalytic reverse water gas shift reaction assisted by an electric field [J]. Catalysis Today, 2014, 232: 27–32.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    SUGIURA K, OGO S, IWASAKI K, et al. Lowtemperature catalytic oxidative coupling of methane in an electric field over a Ce–W–O catalyst system [J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 9: 25154.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    SEKINE Y, HARAGUCHI M, TOMIOKA M, et al. Low-temperature hydrogen production by highly efficient catalytic system assisted by an electric field. [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2010, 114(11): 3824–3833.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    SEKINE Y, TOMIOKA M, MATSUKATA M, et al. Catalytic degradation of ethanol in an electric field [J]. Catalysis Today, 2009, 146(1): 183–187.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    YABE T, KAMITE Y, SUGIURA K, et al. Lowtemperature oxidative coupling of methane in an electric field using carbon dioxide over Ca-doped LaAlO3 perovskite oxide catalysts [J]. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2017, 20: 156–162.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    YABE T, MITARAI K, OSHIMA K, et al. Lowtemperature dry reforming of methane to produce syngas in an electric field over La-doped Ni/ZrO2 catalysts [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2017, 158: 96–103.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    OSHIMA K, TANAKA K, YABE T, et al. Oxidative coupling of methane using carbon dioxide in an electric field over La–ZrO2 catalyst at low external temperature [J]. Fuel, 2013, 107(9): 879–881.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    KIM T, JO S, SONG Y H, et al. Synergetic mechanism of methanol-steam reforming reaction in a catalytic reactor with electric discharges [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 113(1): 1692–1699.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    OSHIMA K, SHINAGAWA T, HARAGUCHI M, et al. Low temperature hydrogen production by catalytic steam reforming of methane in an electric field [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(7): 3003–3011.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    SEKINE Y, HARAGUCHI M, MATSUKATA M, et al. Low temperature steam reforming of methane over metal catalyst supported on CexZr1−xO2 in an electric field [J]. Catalysis Today, 2011, 171(1): 116–125.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    OSHIMA K, SHINAGAWA T, SEKINE Y. Methane conversion assisted by plasma or electric field [J]. Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute, 2013, 56(1): 11–21.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    GIRAUDON J M, ELHACHIMI A, LECLERCQ G. Catalytic oxidation of chlorobenzene over Pd/perovskites [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2008, 84(1): 251–261.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    NARAYANAPPA M, DASIREDDY V D B C, FRIEDRICH H B. Catalytic oxidation of n-octane over cobalt substituted ceria (Ce0.90Co0.10O2−δ) catalysts [J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2012, 447/448: 135–143.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    ZAFEIRATOS S, DINTZER T, TESCHNER D, et al. Methanol oxidation over model cobalt catalysts: Influence of the cobalt oxidation state on the reactivity [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2010, 269(2): 309–317.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    TANG Y, MA L, DOU J, et al. Transition of surface phase of cobalt oxide during CO oxidation [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2018, 20: 6440–6449.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    TRIVEDI S, PRASAD R. Reactive calcination route for synthesis of active Mn–Co3O4, spinel catalysts for abatement of CO–CH4, emissions from CNG vehicles [J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2016, 4: 1017–1028.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    PUÉRTOLAS B, SMITH A, VÁZQUEZ I, et al. The different catalytic behaviour in the propane total oxidation of cobalt and manganese oxides prepared by a wet combustion procedure [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 229(4): 547–558.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    TANG X L, GAO F Y, XIANG Y, et al. Effect of potassium-precursor promoters on catalytic oxidation activity of Mn-CoOx catalysts for NO removal [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(37): 9116–9123.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    LIOTTA L F, CARLO G D, PANTALEO G, et al. Pd/Co3O4, catalyst for CH4 emissions abatement: Study of SO2 poisoning effect [J]. Topics in Catalysis, 2007, 42/43: 425–428.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    KANG M, SONG M W, LEE C H. Catalytic carbon monoxide oxidation over CoOx/CeO2 composite catalysts [J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2003, 251(1): 143–156.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    LI X, ZHANG C, HE H, et al. Promotion effect of residual K on the decomposition of N2O over cobalt–cerium mixed oxide catalyst [J]. Catalysis Today, 2007, 126(3): 449–455.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    LIOTTA L F, CARLO G D, PANTALEO G, et al. Co3O4/CeO2 and Co3O4/CeO2–ZrO2 composite catalysts for methane combustion: Correlation between morphology reduction properties and catalytic activity [J]. Catalysis Communications, 2005, 6(5): 329–336.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    OSAKOO N, HENKEL R, LOIHA S, et al. Palladiumpromoted cobalt catalysts supported on silica prepared by impregnation and reverse micelle for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis [J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2013, 464/465: 269–280.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    XIE X W, SHEN W J. Morphology control of cobalt oxide nanocrystals for promoting their catalytic performance [J]. Nanoscale, 2009, 1(1): 50–60.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    ERCOLINO G, STELMACHOWSKI P, GRZYBEK G, et al. Optimization of Pd catalysts supported on Co3O4 for low-temperature lean combustion of residual methane [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 206: 712–725.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    WANG Y F, ZHANG C B, LIU F D, et al. Welldispersed palladium supported on ordered mesoporous Co3O4 for catalytic oxidation of o-xylene [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2013, 142(10): 72–79.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    DACQUIN J P, DUJARDIN C, GRANGER P. Surface reconstruction of supported Pd on LaCoO3: Consequences on the catalytic properties in the decomposition of N2O [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2008, 253(1): 37–49.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    LI J H, LIANG X, XU S C, et al. Catalytic performance of manganese cobalt oxides on methane combustion at low temperature [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2009, 90(1): 307–312.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    JODŁOWSKI P J, JȨDRZEJCZYK R J, CHLEBDA D, et al. In situ spectroscopic studies of methane catalytic combustion over Co, Ce, and Pd mixed oxides deposited on a steel surface [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2017, 350: 1–12.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    CAO C, BOURANE A, SCHLUP J R, et al. In situ IR investigation of activation and catalytic ignition of methane over Rh/Al2O3 catalysts [J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2008, 344(1): 78–87.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    DEVENER B V, ANDERSON S L, SHIMIZU T, et al. In situ generation of Pd/PdO nanoparticle methane combustion catalyst: Correlation of particle surface chemistry with ignition [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, 80033(80138): 20632–20639.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    CHLEBDA D K, JODWSKI P J, JȨDRZEJCZYK R J, et al. Generalised two-dimensional correlation analysis of the Co, Ce, and Pd mixed oxide catalytic systems for methane combustion using in situ infrared spectroscopy [J]. Spectrochim Acta A: Mol Biomol Spectrosc, 2018, 192: 202–210.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    SCHMAL M, SOUZA M M V M, ALEGRE V V, et al. Methane oxidation—Effect of support, precursor and pretreatment conditions—In situ reaction XPS and DRIFT [J]. Catalysis Today, 2006, 118(3): 392–401.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    DAVYDOV A A, ROCHESTER C H. Infrared spectroscopy of adsorbed species on the surface of transition metal oxides [M]. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 1984.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    HOFLUND G B, LI Z H. Surface characterization study of a Pd/Co3O4 methane oxidation catalyst [J]. Applied Surface Science, 2006, 253(5): 2830–2834.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    JODŁOWSKI P J, JȨDRZEJCZYK R J, CHLEBDA D, et al. In situ spectroscopic studies of methane catalytic combustion over Co, Ce, and Pd mixed oxides deposited on a steel surface [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2017, 350: 1–12.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    HURTADO P, ORDÓNEZ S, SASTREH, et al. Development of a kinetic model for the oxidation of methane over Pd/Al2O3 at dry and wet conditions [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2004, 51(4): 229–238.Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    KAZANSKY V B, SERYKH A I, PIDKO E A. DRIFT study of molecular and dissociative adsorption of light paraffins by HZSM-5 zeolite modified with zinc ions: Methane adsorption [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2004, 225(2): 369–373.Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    STEFANOV P, TODOROVA S, NAYDENOV A, et al. On the development of active and stable Pd–Co/γ-Al2O3 catalyst for complete oxidation of methane [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 266: 329–338.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Jiaotong University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ke Liu (刘柯)
    • 1
  • Ke Li (李珂)
    • 1
  • Dejun Xu (许得隽)
    • 1
  • He Lin (林赫)
    • 1
  • Bin Guan (管斌)
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ting Chen (陈婷)
    • 1
  • Zhen Huang (黄震)
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Power Machinery and Engineering of Ministry of EducationShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations