Advertisement

Characterization of 3D Printed Stretching Devices for Imaging Force Transmission in Live-Cells

  • Carl R. Mayer
  • Paul T. Arsenovic
  • Kranthidhar Bathula
  • Kevin B. Denis
  • Daniel E. ConwayEmail author
Article
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Cell stretch is a method which can rapidly apply mechanical force through cell-matrix and cell-cell adhesions and can be utilized to better understand underlying biophysical questions related to intracellular force transmission and mechanotransduction.

Methods

3D printable stretching devices suitable for live-cell fluorescent imaging were designed using finite element modeling and validated experimentally. These devices were then used along with FRET based nesprin-2G force sensitive biosensors as well as live cell fluorescent staining to understand how the nucleus responds to externally applied mechanical force in cells with both intact LINC (linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton) complex and cells with the LINC complex disrupted using expression of dominant negative KASH protein.

Results

The devices were shown to provide a larger strain ranges (300% uniaxial and 60% biaxial) than currently available commercial or academic designs we are aware of. Under uniaxial deformation, the deformation of the nucleus of NIH 3T3 cells per unit of imposed cell strain was shown to be approximately 50% higher in control cells compared to cells with a disrupted LINC complex. Under biaxial deformation, MDCK II cells showed permanent changes in the nuclear morphology as well as actin organization upon unloading, indicating that failure, plastic deformation, or remodeling of the cytoskeleton is occurring in response to the applied stretch.

Conclusion

Development and open distribution of low-cost, 3D-printable uniaxial and biaxial cell stretching devices compatible with live-cell fluorescent imaging allows a wider range of researchers to investigate mechanical influences on biological questions with only a minimal investment of resources.

Keywords

Cell Stretch Cell mechanics Nuclear mechanics Nuclear LINC complex 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Teemu Ihalainen for providing reagents. We acknowledge support from NIH R35GM119617 and R03AR068096, NSF CMMI-1653299, and the Thomas F. and Kate Miller Jeffress Memorial Trust. Microscopy was performed at the VCU Nano Characterization Core Facility.

Author Contributions

CM and PA wrote the manuscript. CM, PA, KB and KD performed the experiments. CM designed the biaxial stretcher, PA and KB designed the uniaxial stretcher. DC led the project and provided input to the manuscript. All authors helped edit and revise the manuscript.

Data Availability

Any datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflict of interest

Carl R. Mayer, Paul T. Arsenovic, Kranthidhar Bathula, Kevin B. Denis, and Daniel E. Conway declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

No human studies were carried out by the authors for this article. No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Supplementary material

12195_2019_579_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (7.7 mb)
Electronic supplementary material 1 (PDF 7918 kb)
12195_2019_579_MOESM2_ESM.zip (152 kb)
Electronic supplementary material 2 (ZIP 153 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Alam, S. G. et al. The mammalian linc complex regulates genome transcriptional responses to substrate rigidity. Sci. Rep. 6:38063, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alam, S., D. B. Lovett, R. B. Dickinson, K. J. Roux, and T. P. Lele. Nuclear forces and cell mechanosensing. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 126:205–215, 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394624-9.00008-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arsenovic, P. T. & Conway, D. E. Using nesprin tension sensors to measure force on the linc complex. In The LINC Complex, 59–71 (Springer, 2018).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arsenovic, P. et al. Nesprin-2G, a component of the nuclear LINC complex, is subject to myosin-dependent tension. Biophys. J. 110:34–43, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arsenovic, P. T., C. R. Mayer, and D. E. Conway. SensorFRET: a standardless approach to measuring pixel-based spectral bleed-through and FRET efficiency using spectral imaging. Sci. Rep. 7:15609, 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15411-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baddam, S. et al. The desmosomal cadherin desmoglein-2 experiences mechanical tension as demonstrated by a fret-based tension biosensor expressed in living cells. Cells 7:66, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brenner, M. D. et al. Spider silk peptide is a compact, linear nanospring ideal for intracellular tension sensing. Nano Lett. 16:2096–2102, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elosegui-Artola, A. et al. Force triggers YAP nuclear entry by regulating transport across nuclear pores. Cell 171:1397.e14–1410.e14, 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guilak, F., J. R. Tedrow, and R. Burgkart. Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 269:781–786, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ingber, D. E., and I. Tensegrity. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J. Cell Sci. 116:1157–1173, 2003.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee, A. et al. An equibiaxial strain system for cultured cells. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 271:C1400–C1408,1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lombardi, M. L. et al. The interaction between nesprins and sun proteins at the nuclear envelope is critical for force transmission between the nucleus and cytoskeleton. J. Biol. Chem. 286:26743–26753, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.233700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luxton, G. W. G., E. R. Gomes, E. S. Folker, E. Vintinner, and G. G. Gundersen. Linear arrays of nuclear envelope proteins harness retrograde actin flow for nuclear movement. Science (New York) 329:956–959, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luxton, G. W. G., and D. A. Starr. KASHing up with the nucleus: novel functional roles of KASH proteins at the cytoplasmic surface of the nucleus. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 28:69–75, 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2014.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maniotis, A. J., C. S. Chen, and D. E. Ingber. Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94:849–854, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohan, A. et al. Spatial proliferation of epithelial cells is regulated by e-cadherin force. Biophys. J. 115:853–864, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schürmann, S. et al. The isostretcher: an isotropic cell stretch device to study mechanical biosensor pathways in living cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 81:363–372, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shao, Y. et al. Uniaxial cell stretching device for live-cell imaging of mechanosensitive cellular functions. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84:114304, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tajik, A. et al. Transcription upregulation via force-induced direct stretching of chromatin. Nat. Mater. 15:1287, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tseng, Q. et al. A new micropatterning method of soft substrates reveals that different tumorigenic signals can promote or reduce cell contraction levels. Lab Chip 11:2231–2240, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0lc00641f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ursekar, C. P. et al. Design and construction of an equibiaxial cell stretching system that is improved for biochemical analysis. PLoS ONE  9:e90665, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, N., J. D. Tytell, and D. E. Ingber. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.10, 75–82, 2009).  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations