Advertisement

Radiological Physics and Technology

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 409–416 | Cite as

Additive value of split-bolus single-phase CT scan protocol for preoperative assessment of lung cancer patients referred for video-assisted thoracic surgery

  • Ryo Watanabe
  • Yoshinori FunamaEmail author
  • Takeshi Takaki
  • Seitaro Oda
  • Takeshi Nakaura
  • Seiichi Murakami
  • Takatoshi Aoki
Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

We aimed to assess the additive value of the split-bolus single-phase computed tomography (CT) scan protocol to preoperatively assess patients with lung cancer, who were referred for video-assisted thoracic surgery, when compared to a standard staging CT protocol. We included 160 patients with lung cancer who underwent a split-bolus single-phase CT scan protocol (split-bolus protocol), which can acquire whole-body staging CT and pulmonary artery-vein separation CT angiography (PA–PV CTA) in a single acquisition and 160 patients who underwent whole-body staging CT (standard protocol). We compared the quality of the staging CT images of hepatic parenchyma, portal vein, and hepatic vein between both protocols. We also investigated image quality on PA–PV CTA images in the split-bolus protocol and recorded the number of patients that underwent the 3D PA–PV CTA imaging process. The split-bolus protocol for staging CT images demonstrated a slightly higher enhancement with regard to the hepatic parenchyma (p = 0.007) and hepatic vein (p = 0.006) than the standard protocol. There was no significant difference in the quality of the staging CT images between both protocols (p = 0.067). The mean CT number for the main pulmonary artery and the left atrium for the PA–PV CTA images in the split-bolus protocol were 289.1 HU and 172.8 HU, respectively. Among the images associated with the split-bolus protocol, 98.1% were of appropriate quality for 3D PA–PV CTA imaging. The split-bolus protocol is a dose-efficient protocol to acquire the staging CT and PA–PV CTA images in a single session and provides sufficient image quality for preoperative assessment in patients with lung cancer.

Keywords

Split-bolus single-phase CT scan protocol Lung cancer Pulmonary artery-vein separation CT angiography Preoperative assessment 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

References

  1. 1.
    Nagayama Y, Nakaura T, Oda S, et al. Value of 100 kVp scan with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm on a single-source CT system during whole-body CT for radiation and contrast medium dose reduction: an intra-individual feasibility study. Clin Radiol. 2018;73:217.e7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akiba T, Marushima H, Odaka M, et al. Pulmonary vein analysis using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography for thoracicsurgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;58(7):331–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Galluzzo A, Fatica F, Caternicchia F, et al. 3D CT scan for perioperative identification of anatomical variations of lungs. Future Oncol. 2016;12(23):27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fukuhara K, Akashi A, Nakane S, et al. Preoperative assessment of the pulmonary artery by three-dimensional computed tomography before video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34(4):875–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hagiwara M, Shimada Y, Kato Y, et al. High-quality 3-dimensional image simulation for pulmonary lobectomy and segmentectomy: results of preoperative assessment of pulmonary vessels and short-term surgical outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46:e120–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nagashima T, Shimizu K, Ohtaki Y, et al. An analysis of variations in the bronchovascular pattern of the right upper lobe using three-dimensional CT angiography and bronchography. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:354–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang Q, Xie B, Hu M, et al. Thoracoscopic anatomic pulmonary segmentectomy: a 3-dimensional guided imaging system for lung operations. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;23:183–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sumitomo R, Fukui T, Otake Y, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy with an anomalous pulmonary vein. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1398–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mun M, Okumura S, Nakao M, Matsuura M, et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence-navigated thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy. J Vis Surg. 2017;2017:3–80.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sato T, Date H. 3D CT simulation in minimally invasive thoracic surgery. J Vis Surg. 2017;2017:3–26.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shimizu K, Nakazawa S, Nagashima T, et al. 3D-CT anatomy for VATS segmentectomy. J Vis Surg. 2017;2017:3–88.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ye M, Shen J, Kong M, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery right upper lobectomy in a situs inversus totalis patient. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(11):E1018–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yao F, Wang J, Yao J, et al. Three-dimensional image reconstruction with free open-source OsiriX software in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy. Int J Surg Oncol. 2017;39:16–22.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fourdrain A, Dominicis FD, Blanchard C, et al. Three-dimensional CT angiography of anatomic variations in the pulmonary arterial tree. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018;40:45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones SE, Wittram C. The indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram: imaging characteristics and patient clinical outcome. Radiology. 2005;237:329–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Weber M, et al. CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings. Radiology. 2006;241:899–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bae KT, Tao C, Gürel S, et al. Effect of patient weight and scanning duration on contrast enhancement during pulmonary multidetector CT angiography. Radiology. 2007;242:582–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heyer CM, Mohr PS, Lemburg SP, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: prospective randomized study. Radiology. 2007;245:577–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borgen L, Kalra MK, Lærum F, et al. Application of adaptive non-linear 2D and 3D postprocessing filters for reduced dose abdominal CT. Acta Radiol. 2012;53:335–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nakaura T, Awai K, Oda S, et al. Low-kilovoltage, high-tube-current MDCT of liver in thin adults: pilot study evaluating radiation dose, image quality, and display settings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1332–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Apfaltrer P, Sudarski S, Schneider D, et al. Value of monoenergetic low-kV dual energy CT datasets for improved image quality of CT pulmonary angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83:322–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gill MK, Vijayananthan A, Kumar G, et al. Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the detection of pulmonary embolism: effect on radiation dose and image quality. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2015;5(4):524–33.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meier A, Higashigaito K, Martini K, et al. Dual energy CT pulmonary angiography with 6 g iodine—a propensity score-matched study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(12):e0167214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leithner D, Gruber-Rouh T, Beeres M, et al. 90-kVp low-tube-voltage CT pulmonary angiography in combination with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm: effects on radiation dose, image quality and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of pulmonary embolism. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20180269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Awai K, Hatcho A, Nakayama Y, et al. Simulation of aortic peak enhancement on MDCT using a contrast medium flow phantom: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hutchinson BD, Navin P, Marom EM, et al. Overdiagnosis of pulmonary embolism by pulmonary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:271–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryo Watanabe
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yoshinori Funama
    • 4
    Email author
  • Takeshi Takaki
    • 2
  • Seitaro Oda
    • 5
  • Takeshi Nakaura
    • 5
  • Seiichi Murakami
    • 2
  • Takatoshi Aoki
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of Health SciencesKumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyHospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental HealthFukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health School of MedicineFukuokaJapan
  4. 4.Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Life SciencesKumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan
  5. 5.Department of RadiologyKumamoto University HospitalKumamotoJapan

Personalised recommendations