Angular dependence of shielding effect of radiation protective eyewear for radiation protection of crystalline lens
Radiation protective (RP) eyewear effectively protects crystalline lenses from radiation exposure. A drawback of RP eyewear is the angular dependence of the shielding effect, which results from the design of the eyewear. In this study, 21 models of RP eyewear with different designs and lead equivalences were assessed. Each piece of RP eyewear was hung on a Styrofoam phantom that imitated the head, and a 0.125-cc ionization chamber dosimeter was placed at the position of the crystalline lens. The differences in angular dependence of the shielding effect were evaluated by changing the irradiation angle, and parameters that improved the angular dependence of the shielding effect—sufficient lead equivalence, large coverage design, and minimum gap between the crystalline lens and the RP eyewear—were identified. Thus, the findings highlight the importance of selecting RP eyewear according to the angular distribution and the nature of radiation exposure in the workplace for radiation workers.
KeywordsAngular dependence Crystalline lens Interventional radiology Radiation protective eyewear Shielding rate
This research was supported by an NSR Grant for Radiation Safety Regulation Research Strategic Promotion 2017, Japan.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies performed with human or animal participants.
- 2.International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 118 statement on tissue reactions/early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs—threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. ICRP Publ. 2012;3:313–27.Google Scholar
- 6.O’Connor U, Walsh C, Gallagher A, Dowling A, Guiney M, Ryan JM, McEniff N, O'Reilly G. Occupational radiation dose to eyes from interventional radiology procedures in light of the new eye lens dose limit from the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1049):20140627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Bahruddin NA, Hashim S, Karim MKA, Sabarudin A, Ang WC, Salehhon N, Bakar KA. Radiation dose to physicians' eye lens during interventional radiology. J Phys. 2016;694(1):012035 (Conference Series).Google Scholar
- 14.Hu P, Kong Y, Chen B, Liu Q, Zhuo W, Liu H. Shielding effect of lead glasses on radiologists' eye lens exposure in interventional procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2017;20:136–40.Google Scholar
- 17.Clairand I, Bordy JM, Daures J, Debroas J, Denozière M, Donadille L, Ginjaume M, Itié C, Koukorava C, Krim S, Lebacq AL, Martin P, Struelens L, Sans-Mercé M, Tosic M, Vanhavere F. Active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology: tests in laboratory conditions and in hospitals. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011;144(1–4):453–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar