Advertisement

Radiological Physics and Technology

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 417–425 | Cite as

A mask method to assess the uniformity of fat suppression in phantom studies

  • Yasuo TakatsuEmail author
  • Masafumi Nakamura
  • Kenichiro Yamamura
  • Satoshi Sawa
  • Masaki Asahara
  • Michitaka Honda
  • Tosiaki Miyati
Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

Fat suppression is a technique used to suppress the signals from adipose tissues, during clinical evaluation of the tissues near the fat–tissue boundary. However, in cases where the scan area has a complicated shape, the effect of fat suppression may demonstrate poor uniformity, resulting in diagnosis-related difficulties. To improve the uniformity of fat suppression, phantom studies are more suitable than volunteer studies. In this study, we evaluated the reliability of the region of interest (ROI) dependency using an unevenness phantom, to develop a method to assess the uniformity of fat suppression while using whole magnetic resonance imaging by masking the surrounding phantom. We modulated different ROI sizes, which were eroded from 100% to approximately 50%, and observed that the normalized absolute average deviation and error increased with decreased ROI. Using our method, more objective, concrete, and accurate data could be obtained by including the whole-body phantom (whole poor uniformity area).

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging Fat suppression Uniformity Normalized absolute average deviation Mask method 

Notes

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ. Chapter 4, spectral radiofrequency pulses. In: Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ, editors. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. London: Elsevier Academic; 2004. p. 96–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ. Chapter 5, spatial radiofrequency pulses. In: Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ, editors. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. London: Elsevier Academic; 2004. p. 125–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ. Chapter 6, adiabatic radiofrequency pulses. In: Zhou XJ, editor. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. London: Elsevier Academic; 2004. p. 177–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reeder SB, Yu H, Johnson JW, Shimakawa A, Brittain JH, Pelc NJ, Beaulieu CF, Gold GE. T1- and T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging of the brachial plexus and cervical spine with IDEAL water-fat separation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:825–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Takatsu Y, Nishiyama K, Miyati T, Miyano H, Kajihara M, Akasaka T. A comparison of shimming techniques for optimizing fat suppression in MR mammography. Radiol Phys Technol. 2013;6:486–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosen Y, Bloch BN, Lenkinski RE, Greenman RL, Marquis RP, Rofsky NM. 3T MR of the prostate: reducing susceptibility gradients by inflating the endorectal coil with a barium sulfate suspension. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57:898–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Takatsu Y, Kyotani K, Ueyama T, Miyati T, Yamamura K, Andou A. Assessment of the quality of breast MR imaging using the modified Dixon method and frequency-selective fat suppression: a phantom study. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2018;17:350–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mirowitz SA, Apicella P, Reinus WR, Hammerman AM. MR imaging of bone marrow lesions: relative conspicuousness on T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and STIR images. Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:215–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le-Petross H, Kundra V, Szklaruk J, Wei W, Hortobagyi GN, Ma J. Fast three-dimensional dual echo dixon technique improves fat suppression in breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31:889–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Determination of image uniformity in diagnostic magnetic resonance images. NEMA Standards Publication MS 3-2008 (NEMA, Rosslyn, VA, 2008), 2008. pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1979;9(1):62–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2013;48:452–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takatsu Y, Akasaka T, Miyati T. The Dixon technique and the frequency-selective fat suppression technique in three-dimensional T1 weighted MRI of the liver: a comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of hepatocellular carcinomas-to-liver. Br J Radiol. 2015;88:20150117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health and WelfareTokushima Bunri UniversitySanukiJapan
  2. 2.Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKanazawa UniversityKanazawaJapan
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyOtsu City HospitalOtsuJapan
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyOsaka Medical College HospitalTakatsukiJapan
  5. 5.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi HospitalKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations