Dose prescription point in forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy of breast and head/neck cancers
- 75 Downloads
In the forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FIMRT) technique of treatment planning, the isocenter cannot fulfill the requirements of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) reference point. This study aimed to propose dose prescription points to be used in breast and head/neck cancer patients treated using the FIMRT technique. Two-hundred patients with head/neck (n = 100) and breast (n = 100) cancers were selected. Treatment plans involved using the FIMRT technique. The suggested reference points (SRPs) for dose prescription were placed at selected locations in the lateral neck site and the tangential site in breast and head/neck cancer patients, respectively. Next, doses at the SRPs (DSRPs) were compared to the planning treatment volume (PTV)-equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and mean dose in the PTV (Dmean) extracted from dose–volume histograms. The differences between DSRPs and Dmean for the PTVs were less than 2% in 78 cases and less than 1% in 28 cases. The DSRPs were comparable with the EUD in both types of PTVs; moreover, paired t test analyses indicated that the SRP doses and PTV EUD were statistically similar (p > 0.05). In 116 cases, the discrepancy between DSRP and EUD was less than 2% and less than 1% in 74 cases. The SRPs satisfy the ICRU requirement that the reference point dose should be clinically relevant and representative of the dose throughout the PTV. A consensus on the definition of the reference point is expected to lead to accurate inter-comparison between results from different treatment centers, facilitating the optimization of treatment procedures.
KeywordsPrescription dose Forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy ICRU reference point Dmean Equivalent uniform dose Multi leaf collimator Dose–volume histogram
This manuscript was supported by the Faculty of Medicine of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. We would like to acknowledge all the radiation therapy technicians of the Radiotherapy department of the Tohid Hospital where the data acquisition was performed for this study.
This study was funded by the Faculty of Medicine of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences (Grant Number: 1395/131).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Standards of human rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed.
Standards of animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with animal performed.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Khan FM, Gibbons JP. Khan's the physics of radiation therapy. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW); 2014.Google Scholar
- 2.Halperin EC, Perez CA. Perez and Brady’s principles and practice of radiation oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW); 2013. Google Scholar
- 13.Brahme A. Which parameters of the dose distribution are best related to the radiation response of tumours and normal tissues? (IAEA-TECDOC--734). International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); 1994.Google Scholar
- 14.Yaparpalvi R, Hong L, Mah D, Shen J, Mutyala S, Spierer M, et al. ICRU reference dose in an era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy clinical trials: correlation with planning target volume mean dose and suitability for intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription. Radiother Oncol. 2008;89(3):347–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Khan FM, Gibbons JP, Sperduto PW. Khan’s treatment planning in radiation oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW); 2016.Google Scholar
- 30.Podgorsak EB. Review of radiation oncology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency Educational reports series; 2003.Google Scholar