Advertisement

Children’s Multidimensional Subjective Well-Being in OECD and Non-OECD Countries: Is Cross-Country Comparison Possible?

  • Noam TarshishEmail author
Article

Abstract

Child well-being is regarded a key concept in research initiatives designed to assess children’s status globally. In recent years, research on the relatively new aspect of child subjective well-being (SWB) has been growing, and evidence associates low SWB with various negative life conditions. Thus, international comparisons of child SWB can serve as an important tool for countries that wish to improve the lives of children. Validating tools used to evaluate child SWB and prove them reliable for cross-country comparisons in different samples of countries and contexts is essential for that purpose. This study utilized a representative sample of the ISCWeB Children’s Worlds survey, which included 21,508 12-year-olds in 18 countries, to determine whether the General Domain Satisfaction Index (GDSI) – a multidimensional measure of child SWB is valid for cross-country comparisons in two sub-samples: OECD and non-OECD member states. After preliminary results had shown a significant difference in GDSI scores between the two sub-samples, a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis revealed that in both sub-samples, it was possible to compare regression weights and correlations, but not means. Limitations and future directions for research in the child SWB field are discussed.

Keywords

Subjective well-being International comparisons GDSI Children Life satisfaction 

Notes

References

  1. Ben-Arieh, A. (2005). Where are the children? Children’s role in measuring and monitoring their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Arieh, A. (2008). The child indicators movement: Past, present, and future. Child Indicators Research, 1(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Arieh, A., & Tarshish, N. (2016). Children’s rights and well-being). In M. D. Ruck, M. Peterson-Badali, & M. Freeman (Eds.), Handbook of children's rights: Global and multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 68–77). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Arieh, A., McDonell, J., & Attar-Schwartz, S. (2009). Safety and home–school relations as indicators of children well being: Whose perspective counts? Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., & Korbin, J. E. (2014). Multifaceted concept of child well-being. In A. Ben-Arieh et al. (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being (pp. 1–27). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradshaw, J., Martorano, B., Natali, L., & de Neubourg, C. (2013). Children’s subjective well-being in rich countries. Child Indicators Research, 6(4), 619–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Casas, F. (2011). Subjective social indicators and child and adolescent well-being. Child Indicators Research, 4(4), 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casas, F. (2017). Analysing the comparability of 3 multi-item subjective well-being psychometric scales among 15 countries using samples of 10 and 12-year-olds. Child Indicators Research, 10(2), 297–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Casas, F., & Rees, G. (2015). Measures of children’s subjective well-being: Analysis of the potential for cross-national comparisons. Child Indicators Research, 8(1), 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casas, F., Sarriera, J. C., Abs, D., Coenders, G., Alfaro, J., Saforcada, E., & Tonon, G. (2012). Subjective indicators of personal well-being among adolescents. Performance and results for different scales in Latin-language speaking countries: A contribution to the international debate. Child Indicators Research, 5(1), 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-011-9119-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Casas, F., Bello, A., González, M., & Aligué, M. (2013a). Children’s subjective well-being measured using a composite index: What impacts Spanish first-year secondary education students’ subjective well-being? Child Indicators Research, 6(3), 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Casas, F., Tiliouine, H., & Figuer, C. (2013b). The subjective well-being of adolescents from two different cultures: Applying three versions of the PWI in Algeria and Spain. Social Indicators Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0229-z.
  15. Casas, F., Sarriera, J. C., Alfaro, J., González, M., Bedin, L., Abs, D., Valdenegro, B. (2014). Reconsidering life domains that contribute to subjective well-being among adolescents with data from three countries. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 491–513.Google Scholar
  16. Clair, A. (2014). The effects of schooling and education policy on the subjective well-being of children: A comparative study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of York.Google Scholar
  17. Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the trail of the gold standard for subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 35(2), 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cummins, R. A., & Gullone, E. (2000). Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement. Proceedings of the second international conference on quality of life in cities (pp. 74–93). Singapore: National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
  19. Cummins, R., & Lau, A. (2005). Personal wellbeing index–school children. Victoria: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University.Google Scholar
  20. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61,305–314.Google Scholar
  23. Dinisman, T., & Ben-Arieh, A. (2016). The characteristics of children’s subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 126(2), 555–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dinisman, T., Fernandes, L., & Main, G. (2015). Findings from the first wave of the ISCWeB project: International perspectives on child subjective well-being. Child Indicators Research, 8(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilman, R., & Huebner, S. (2003). A review of life satisfaction research with children and adolescents. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Headey, B. (2010). The set point theory of well-being has serious flaws: on the eve of a scientific revolution?. Social Indicators Research, 97(1), 7-21.Google Scholar
  27. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2013). World happiness report. New York: The Earth Institute, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  29. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huebner, E. S. (1991). Further validation of the students’ life satisfaction scale: The independence of satisfaction and affect ratings. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9(4), 363–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huebner, E. S. (2004). Research on assessment of life satisfaction of children and adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 66(1–2), 3–33.Google Scholar
  32. Huebner, E. S., Seligson, J. L., Valois, R. F., & Suldo, S. M. (2006). A review of the brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Social Indicators Research, 79(3), 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huebner, E. S., Antaramian, S. P., Hills, K. J., Lewis, A. D., & Saha, R. (2011). Stability and predictive validity of the brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Child Indicators Research, 4(1), 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kenny, D. A. (2011). Measuring model fit. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/ Google Scholar
  36. Klocke, A., Clair, A., & Bradshaw, J. (2014). International variation in child subjective well-being. Child Indicators Research, 7(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kosher, H., & Ben-Arieh, A. (2017). What children think about their rights and their well-being: A cross-national comparison. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 87(3), 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, B. J., & Yoo, M. S. (2015). Family, school, and community correlates of children’s subjective well-being: An international comparative study. Child Indicators Research, 8(1), 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, B. J., & Yoo, M. S. (2017). What accounts for the variations in children's subjective well-being across nations? A decomposition method study. Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Melton, G., & Limber, S. (1992). What children’s rights mean to children: Children’s own views. In M. Freeman & P. Veerman (Eds.), The ideologies of children’s rights (pp. 167–187). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  41. OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. OECD publishing: Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264191655-en.
  42. OECD. (2017a). How's life? 2017: Measuring well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. OECD. (2017b). OECD work on health. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. OECD. (n.d.). About the OECD. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/about/.
  45. Raghavan, R., & Alexandrova, A. (2015). Toward a theory of child well-being. Social Indicators Research, 121(3), 887–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rees, G., & Dinisman, T. (2015). Comparing children’s experiences and evaluations of their lives in 11 different countries. Child Indicators Research, 8(1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rees, G., & Main, G. (Eds.) (2015). Children's views on their lives and well-being in 15 countries: A report on the Children's worlds survey, 2013-14. York: Children's Worlds Project (ISCWeB).Google Scholar
  48. Rees, G., Goswami, H., & Bradshaw, J. (2010). Developing an index of children’s subjective well-being in England. London: The Children’s Society.Google Scholar
  49. Rees, G., Andresen, S. & Bradshaw, J. (eds) (2016) Children’s views on their lives and well-being in 16 countries: A report on the Children’s Worlds survey of children aged eight years old, 2013-15. York, UK: Children’s Worlds Project (ISCWeB).Google Scholar
  50. Seligson, J. L., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2003). Preliminary validation of the brief multidimensional Students' life satisfaction scale (BMSLSS). Social Indicators Research, 61(2), 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited. Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social Progress, Paris.Google Scholar
  52. Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). The subjective wellbeing of high-school students: Validating the personal wellbeing index-school children. Social Indicators Research, 101(3), 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. New York: Author.Google Scholar
  54. Vittersø, J., Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2005). The divergent meanings of life satisfaction: Item response modeling of the satisfaction with life scale in Greenland and Norway. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social WelfareThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations