Advertisement

Food Analytical Methods

, Volume 12, Issue 11, pp 2491–2499 | Cite as

A Novel and Accurate Method for Moisture Adsorption Isotherm Determination of Sultana Raisins

  • Jun Li
  • Lei Dong
  • Man Xiao
  • Dongling Qiao
  • Kao Wu
  • Fatang JiangEmail author
  • Saffa B. Riffa
  • Yuehong Su
Article
  • 81 Downloads

Abstract

A novel method (dynamic water transfer–based water activity analyzer (DWT) method) based on Fick’s law of diffusion for the accurate measurement of moisture sorption isotherm (MSI) has been developed and was compared with saturated salt solutions (SSS) method and dynamic vapor sorption (DVS) method. MSIs at 25 °C of sultana raisins obtained by the three methods were analyzed and compared, and four adsorption models (BET, Halsey, GAB, and Peleg) were used to fit the results. The MSI curves obtained by the three methods all showed the similar type III isotherm characteristic, but equilibrium moisture content at the same relative humidity (RH) showed some differences, and the repeatability and accuracy were different. Generally, results obtained by the SSS method may have relatively low accuracy due to the relatively high measurement error; results obtained by the DVS method may lack representativeness due to the small sample size; results obtained by the DWT method may have high representativeness and accuracy at the same time. The fitting results of adsorption models indicated that MSI results obtained by the DWT method had the highest fitting degree with the Peleg model. This study may contribute to deepened understandings on MSI measurement of semi-dried foods.

Keywords

Moisture sorption isotherm Dynamic vapor sorption Saturated salt solution Dynamic water transfer–based water activity analyzer Sultana raisins 

Notes

Funding Information

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31671827 and 31801582) and the European Commission for the H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Individual Fellowships-2017 Project (Grant ID: 794680).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Jun Li declares that she has no conflict of interest. Lei Dong declares that he has no conflict of interest. Man Xiao declares that he has no conflict of interest. Dongling Qiao declares that she has no conflict of interest. Kao Wu declares that he has no conflict of interest. Fatang Jiang declares that he has no conflict of interest. Saffa B. Riffa declares that he has no conflict of interest. Yuehong Su declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

References

  1. Almuhtaseb AH, Wam MM, Tra M (2002) Moisture sorption isotherm characteristics of food products: a review. Food Bioprod Process 80(2):118–128Google Scholar
  2. Association of Office Analytical Chemist (AOAC) (1990) Official method of analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. no, Arlington, p 934.06Google Scholar
  3. Atungulu GG, Olatunde G, Sadaka S (2018) Impact of rewetting and drying of rough rice on predicted moisture content profiles during in-bin drying and storage. Dry Technol 36(4):468–476Google Scholar
  4. Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Fontana AJ, Schmidt SJ, Labuza TP (2007) Water activity in foods: fundamentals and applications. Blackwell Publishing, IwoaGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu S, Shivhare US, Mujumdar AS (2006) Models for sorption isotherms for foods: a review. Dry Technol 24(8):917–930Google Scholar
  6. Bazardeh ME, Esmaiili M (2014) Sorption isotherm and state diagram in evaluating storage stability for sultana raisins. J Stored Prod Res 59:140–145Google Scholar
  7. Van den Berg C, Bruin S (1981) Water activity and its estimation in food systems: theoretical aspects. Rockland L B. and Stewart G E(Eds.) Water activity: influence on food quality. Academic Press: New York, pp 1–43Google Scholar
  8. Bertuzzi MA, Vidaurre EC, Armada M, Gottifredi JC (2007) Water vapor permeability of edible starch based films. J Food Eng 80(3):972–978Google Scholar
  9. Besbes E, Jury V, Monteau JY, Le Bail A (2013) Water vapor transport properties during staling of bread crumb and crust as affected by heating rate. Food Res Int 50(1):10–19Google Scholar
  10. Bhouri AM, Flamini G, Chraief I, Hammami M (2016) Aromatic compounds and soluble carbohydrate profiles of different varieties of Tunisian raisin (Vitis vinifera L.). Int J Food Prop 19(2):12Google Scholar
  11. Bingol G, Prakash B, Pan Z (2012) Dynamic vapor sorption isotherms of medium grain rice varieties. LWT Food Sci Technol 48(2):156–163Google Scholar
  12. Bradley RL, Vanderwarn MA (2001) Determination of moisture in cheese and cheese products. J AOAC Int 84(2):570–592PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60(2):309–319Google Scholar
  14. Bui R, Labat M, Aubert JE (2017) Comparison of the saturated salt solution and the dynamic vapor sorption techniques based on the measured sorption isotherm of barley straw. Constr Build Mater 141:140–151Google Scholar
  15. Caballero–Cerón C, Guerrero-Beltrán JA, Mújica–Paz H, Torres JA, Welti–Chanes J (2015) Moisture sorption isotherms of foods: experimental methodology, mathematical analysis, and practical applications. Water Stress in Biological, Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Food Systems Springer, New York, pp 187–214Google Scholar
  16. Castro N, Durrieu V, Raynaud C, Rouilly A (2016) Influence of DE-value on the physicochemical properties of maltodextrin for melt extrusion processes. Carbohydr Polym 144:464–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen XQ, Zhang ZF, Gao ZM, Huang Y, Wu ZQ (2017) Physicochemical properties and cell-based bioactivity of Pu’erh tea polysaccharide conjugates. Int J Biol Macromol 104:1294–1301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Domian E, Brynda-Kopytowska A, Cieśla J, Górska A (2018) Effect of carbohydrate type on the DVS isotherm-induced phase transitions in spray-dried fat-filled pea protein-based powders. J Food Eng 222:115–125Google Scholar
  19. Fouskaki M, Karametsi K, Chaniotakis NA (2003) Method for the determination of water content in sultana raisins using a water activity probe. Food Chem 82(1):133–137Google Scholar
  20. Ghrairi F, Lahouar L, Amira EA, Ferchichi A, Achour L, Brahmi F (2013) Physicochemical composition of different varieties of raisins (Vitis vinifera L.) from Tunisia. Ind Crop Prod 43:73–77Google Scholar
  21. Halsey G (1948) Physical adsorption on non-uniform surfaces. J Chem Phys 16(10):931–937Google Scholar
  22. Hill CA, Norton A, Newman G (2009) The water vapor sorption behavior of natural fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 112(3):1524–1537Google Scholar
  23. Horwitz W (1988) Sampling and preparation of sample for chemical examination. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 71(2):241–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jebri M, Desmorieux H, Maaloul A, Saadaoui E, Romdhane M (2018) Drying of Salvia officinalis L. by hot air and microwaves: dynamic desorption isotherms, drying kinetics and biochemical quality. Heat Mass Transfer 55(4):1143–1153Google Scholar
  25. Karakaya SN, El AA, Tas S (2001) Antioxidant activity of some foods containing phenolic compounds. Int J Food Sci Nutr 52(6):501–508PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Labuza TP, Altunakar B (2007) Water activity prediction and moisture sorption isotherms. Water Activity in Foods: Fundamentals and Applications 1:109–154Google Scholar
  27. Lemus MR (2011) Models of sorption isotherms for food: uses and limitations. Vitae 18(3):325–334Google Scholar
  28. Lin S, Xue P, Yang S, Li X, Dong X, Chen F (2017) Water dynamics of Ser-His-Glu-Cys-Asn powder and effects of moisture absorption on its chemical properties. J Sci Food Agric 97(10):3124–3132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Maltini E, Torreggiani D, Venir E, Bertolo G (2003) Water activity and the preservation of plant foods. Food Chem 82(1):79–86Google Scholar
  30. Medeiros ML, Ayrosa AMIB, de Moraes Pitombo RN, da Silva Lannes SC (2006) Sorption isotherms of cocoa and cupuassu products. J Food Eng 73(4):402–406Google Scholar
  31. Peleg M (1993) Assessment of a semi-empirical four parameter general model for sigmoid moisture sorption isotherms. J Food Process Eng 16(1):21–37Google Scholar
  32. Purohit SR, Rao PS (2016) Modelling and analysis of moisture sorption isotherm of raw and pregelatinized rice flour and its crystalline status prediction. Food Anal Methods 10(6):1–8Google Scholar
  33. Ramos IN, Brandão TRS, Silva CLM (2003) Structural changes during air drying of fruits and vegetables. Food Sci Technol Int 9(3):201–206Google Scholar
  34. Saravacos GD, Tsiourvas DA, Tsami E (1986) Effect of temperature on the water adsorption isotherms of sultana raisins. J Food Sci 51(2):381–383Google Scholar
  35. Sheokand S, Modi SR, Bansal AK (2016) Quantification of low levels of amorphous content in crystalline celecoxib using dynamic vapor sorption (DVS). Eur J Pharm Biopharm 102:77–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsami E, Marinos-Kouris D, Maroulis ZB (1990) Water sorption isotherms of raisins, currants, figs, prunes and apricots. J Food Sci 55(6):1594–1597Google Scholar
  37. Van den Berg C, Bruin S (1981) Water activity and its estimation in food systems: theoretical aspects. In: Rockland LB, Stewart GE (eds) Water activity: influence on food quality. Academic Press, New York, p 1–43Google Scholar
  38. Wang X, Shi Q, Zhao Y, Wang X, Zheng Y (2013) Moisture adsorption isotherms and heat of sorption of Agaricus bisporus. J Food Process Preserv 37(4):299–305Google Scholar
  39. Wang L, Xiao M, Dai S, Song J, Ni X, Fang Y, Jiang F (2014) Interactions between carboxymethyl konjac glucomannan and soy protein isolate in blended films. Carbohydr Polym 101:136–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Xiao M, Dai S, Wang L, Ni X, Yan W, Fang Y (2015) Carboxymethyl modification of konjac glucomannan affects water binding properties. Carbohydr Polym 130:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang S, Liu X, Jin Y, Li X, Chen F, Zhang M, Lin S (2016) Water dynamics in egg white peptide, Asp-His-Thr-Lys-Glu, powder monitored by dynamic vapor sorption and LF-NMR. J Agric Food Chem 64(10):2153–2161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Young JF (1967) Humidity control in the laboratory using salt solutions—a review. J Appl Chem 17(9):241–245Google Scholar
  43. Zelinka SL, Glass SV, Boardman CR, Derome D (2014) Moisture storage and transport properties of preservative treated and untreated southern pine wood. Wood Mater Sci Eng 11(4):228–238Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jun Li
    • 1
  • Lei Dong
    • 1
  • Man Xiao
    • 1
  • Dongling Qiao
    • 1
  • Kao Wu
    • 1
  • Fatang Jiang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Saffa B. Riffa
    • 2
  • Yuehong Su
    • 2
  1. 1.Glyn O. Philips Hydrocolloid Research Centre at HUT, School of Bioengineering and Food ScienceHubei University of TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations