Advertisement

Development of a Vortex-Assisted Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction (VA-DLLME) and LC-MS/MS Procedure for Simultaneous Determination of Fipronil and its Metabolite Fipronil Sulfone in Tomato Fruits

  • Osama I. AbdallahEmail author
  • Nevein S. Ahmed
Article

Abstract

A rapid, simple, inexpensive, and reliable vortex-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (VA-DLLME) method was developed for the determination of fipronil and its major metabolite, fipronil sulfone, in tomato fruits using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). No salting-out or cleanup steps were required after extraction. Average recoveries ranged from 89.8 to 96.3% with relative standard deviation (RSD) values below 11.6%. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) of the method was 0.25 μg/kg, which is 20 times below the European Union-defined maximum residue limit (MRL) of 5 μg/kg. Good linearity was achieved, with a correlation coefficient ≥ 0.996 based on matrix-matched calibration. We investigated the dissipation and residue distribution of fipronil in tomato fruits after one application of suspension concentrate (SC) or emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulations over 28 days under field conditions using the VA-DLLME method. The half-life (t1/2) of fipronil dissipation was 2.4 and 2.8 days, and the estimated pre-harvest interval (PHI) was 23 and 32 days for the SC and EC formulation, respectively. A risk assessment was conducted by evaluating the health risk index (HRI); the estimated PHIs values indicate it is safe to consume tomatoes after the recommended application of fipronil.

Keywords

Fipronil Tomatoes DLLME Method validation Dissipation kinetic Risk assessment 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Osama Abdallah declares that he has no conflict of interest. Nevein S. EL Deen declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

The authors named in the manuscript are entitled to the authorship and have approved the final version of the submitted manuscript.

References

  1. Abdallah OI, Hanafi A, Ghani SBA, Ghisoni S, Lucini L (2017) Pesticides contamination in Egyptian honey samples. J Verbrauch Lebensm 12:317–327Google Scholar
  2. Abdallah OI, Alamer SS, Alrasheed AM (2018) Monitoring pesticide residues in dates marketed in Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia using a QuEChERS methodology and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Biomed Chromatogr 32:e4199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abd-Alrahman SH, Osama I (2012) Dissipation rate of different commercial formulations of malathion applied to tomatoes. Afr J Agric Res 7:332–5335Google Scholar
  4. Angioni A, Dedola F, Garau A, Sarais G, Cabras P, Caboni P (2011) Chlorpyrifos residues levels in fruits and vegetables after field treatment. J Environ Sci Health B 46:544–549Google Scholar
  5. Arthur FH (2004) Evaluation of a new insecticide formulation (F2) as a protectant of stored wheat, maize, and rice. J Stored Prod Res 40:317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bai B, LI MP ZSW (2014) Determination of chlorfenapyr and fipronil residues in vegetables by QuEChERS combined with dispersive liquid⁃ liquid microextraction and high performance liquid chromatography. Food Sci 35:254–258Google Scholar
  7. Bates R (2002) Pesticide residues and consumer risk assessments. Pestic Outlook 13:142–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhardwaj U, Kumar R, Kaur S, Sahoo SK, Mandal K, Battu R, Singh B (2012) Persistence of fipronil and its risk assessment on cabbage, Brassica oleracea var capitata L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 79:301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biswas S, Mondal R, Mukherjee A, Sarkar M, Kole RK (2019) Simultaneous determination and risk assessment of fipronil and its metabolites in sugarcane, using GC-ECD and confirmation by GC-MS/MS. Food Chem 272:559–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bobé A, Meallier P, Cooper J-F, Coste CM (1998) Kinetics and mechanisms of abiotic degradation of fipronil (hydrolysis and photolysis). J Agric Food Chem 46:2834–2839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabras P, Gennari M, Meloni M, Cabitza F, Cubeddu M (1989) Pesticide residues in lettuce. 2. Influence of formulations. J Agric Food Chem 37:1405–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CEN (2008) Foods of plant origin-determination of pesticide residues using GC-MS and/or LC-MS/MS following acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and clean-up by dispersive SPE QuEChERS-method EN 15662:2008Google Scholar
  13. Cheng Y, Dong F, Liu X, Xu J, Meng W, Liu N, Chen Z, Tao Y, Zheng Y (2014) Simultaneous determination of fipronil and its major metabolites in corn and soil by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Methods 6:1788–1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Codex-Alimentarius (n.d.) Joint FAO/WHO Secretariat. Rome. [further information and database on Codex maximum residue limits (MRLs) at: http://www.fao.org/AG/AGP/AGPP/Pesticid/] Accessed 20.Jul 2018
  15. Cravedi J, Delous G, Zalko D, Viguie C, Debrauwer L (2013) Disposition of fipronil in rats. Chemosphere 93:2276–2283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cunha SC, Fernandes JO, Oliveira MBP (2007) Comparison of matrix solid-phase dispersion and liquid–liquid extraction for the chromatographic determination of fenthion and its metabolites in olives and olive oils. Food Addit Contam 24:156–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dorais M, Ehret DL, Papadopoulos AP (2008) Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) health components: from the seed to the consumer. Phytochem Rev 7:231–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duhan A, Kumari B, Duhan S (2015) Determination of residues of fipronil and its metabolites in cauliflower by using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 94:260–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elbadrawy E, Sello A (2016) Evaluation of nutritional value and antioxidant activity of tomato peel extracts. Arab J Chem 9:S1010–S1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. EU-MRL-Database (2018b) MRL of fipronil in tomato samples. Retrieved from (http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/public/?event=pesticideresidueCurrentMRL&language=EN) Accessed 25 Dec 2018
  21. FAO (2009) Manual on the submission and evaluation of pesticide residues data. Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  22. FAOSTAT (2018) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed on 1 Apr 2019
  23. Ferrer C, Lozano A, Agüera A, Girón AJ, Fernández-Alba A (2011) Overcoming matrix effects using the dilution approach in multiresidue methods for fruits and vegetables. J Chromatogr A 1218:7634–7639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gupta S, Sharma R, Sinha S, Gupta R, Gajbhiye V (2007) Persistence of some new insecticides in brinjal and their efficacy against brinjal leafhopper and borer. Pestic Res J 19:205–209Google Scholar
  25. Gupta S, Sharma R, Gupta R, Sinha S, Singh R, Gajbhiye V (2009) Persistence of new insecticides and their efficacy against insect pests of okra. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 82:243–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hainzl D, Casida JE (1996) Fipronil insecticide: novel photochemical desulfinylation with retention of neurotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:12764–12767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoskins W (1961) Mathematical treatment of the rate of loss of pesticide residues FAO. Plant Prot Bull 9:214–215Google Scholar
  28. JMPR (2011) Acceptable daily intakes, acute reference doses, short-term and long-term dietary intakes, recommended maximum residue limits and supervised trials median residue values recorded by the 2011 meeting. Summary report from the 2011 Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR). GenevaGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaczyński P, Łozowicka B (2017) One-step QuEChERS-based approach to extraction and cleanup in multiresidue analysis of sulfonylurea herbicides in cereals by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Food Anal Methods 10:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaur R, Mandal K, Kumar R, Singh B (2015) Analytical method for determination of fipronil and its metabolites in vegetables using the QuEChERS method and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J AOAC Int 98:464–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Korunic Z (1998) Review diatomaceous earths, a group of natural insecticides. J Stored Prod Res 34:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lehotay S (2007) AOAC official method 2007.01 pesticide residues in foods by acetonitrile extraction and partitioning with magnesium sulfate. J AOAC Int 90:485–520Google Scholar
  33. Li M, Li P, Wang L, Feng M, Han L (2015) Determination and dissipation of fipronil and its metabolites in peanut and soil. J Agric Food Chem 63:4435–4443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu Y, Ni Z, Mo R, Shen D, Zhong D, Tang F (2015) Environmental behaviors of phoxim with two formulations in bamboo forest under soil surface mulching. J Environ Sci 35:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lu M, Du J, Zhou P, Chen H, Lu C, Zhang Q (2015) Endocrine disrupting potential of fipronil and its metabolite in reporter gene assays. Chemosphere 120:246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacLachlan DJ, Hamilton D (2011) A review of the effect of different application rates on pesticide residue levels in supervised residue trials. Pest Manag Sci 67:609–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Malhat F, Boulangé J, Abdelraheem E, Allah OA, El-Hamid RA, El-Salam SA (2017) Validation of QuEChERS based method for determination of fenitrothion residues in tomatoes by gas chromatography–flame photometric detector: decline pattern and risk assessment. Food Chem 229:814–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mohapatra S, Deepa M, Jagdish G, Rashmi N, Kumar S, Prakash G (2010) Fate of fipronil and its metabolites in/on grape leaves, berries and soil under semi arid tropical climatic conditions. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 84:587–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oerke E-C (2006) Crop losses to pests. J Agric Sci 144:31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paramasivam M, Chandrasekaran S (2013) Determination of fipronil and its major metabolites in vegetables, fruit and soil using QuEChERS and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Int J Environ Anal Chem 93:1203–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pei Z, Yitong L, Baofeng L, Gan JJ (2004) Dynamics of fipronil residue in vegetable-field ecosystem. Chemosphere 57:1691–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramesh A, Balasubramanian M (1999) Kinetics and hydrolysis of fenamiphos, fipronil, and trifluralin in aqueous buffer solutions. J Agric Food Chem 47:3367–3371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sammelson RE, Caboni P, Durkin KA, Casida JE (2004) GABA receptor antagonists and insecticides: common structural features of 4-alkyl-1-phenylpyrazoles and 4-alkyl-1-phenyltrioxabicyclooctanes. Bioorg Med Chem 12:3345–3355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. SANTE/11813/2017 Guidance document on analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticides residues analysis in food and feed. https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/plant/docs/pesticides_mrl_guidelines_wrkdoc_2017-11813.pdf Accessed 11 Mar 2018
  45. Tingle CC, Rother JA, Dewhurst CF, Lauer S, King WJ (2003) Fipronil: environmental fate, ecotoxicology, and human health concerns. In: Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. Springer, pp 1–66Google Scholar
  46. Tomlin C (1994) The pesticide manual incorporating the agrochemical handbook British crop protection, Surrey, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  47. Viñas P, Campillo N, López-García I, Hernández-Córdoba M (2014) Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction in food analysis. A critical review. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:2067–2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang H-S, Sthiannopkao S, du J, Chen ZJ, Kim KW, Mohamed Yasin MS, Hashim JH, Wong CKC, Wong MH (2011) Daily intake and human risk assessment of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) based on Cambodian market basket data. J Hazard Mater 192:1441–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang T, Hu J, Liu C (2014) Simultaneous determination of insecticide fipronil and its metabolites in maize and soil by gas chromatography with electron capture detection. Environ Monit Assess 186:2767–2774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. WHO (2003) GEMS/food regional diets (regional per capita consumption of raw and semiprocessed agricultural commodities http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/chem/regional_diets/en Accessed 29 Dec 2018
  51. Zhou Y, Xu D, Chen D, Zhang Z, Zheng X, Fang E (2011) Determination of fipronil and its metabolites in tea by solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry Se pu=. Chin J Chromatogr 29:656–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pesticide Residues and Environmental Pollution, Central Agricultural Pesticide LaboratoryAgricultural Research CenterGizaEgypt
  2. 2.Food Safety LaboratoryBuraydahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations