Advertisement

Electrochemical Magnetic Bead-Based Immunosensor for Rapid and Quantitative Detection of Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus in Dairy Products

  • Yu Xue
  • Dong-lei Jiang
  • Qin Hu
  • Sheng-qi Rao
  • Lu Gao
  • Zhen-quan Yang
Article

Abstract

Rapid and quantitative detection of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus at the strain level is important for quality control of probiotic products. In this study, an electrochemical magnetic bead-based immunosensor (EMBI) was developed for the specific quantification of probiotic L. rhamnosus strain GG (LGG) in dairy products. Magnetic beads coupled with a specific antibody against the pilus subunit SpaA of LGG (Ab-SpaA) were prepared to selectively capture LGG from the background, which were then detected using horseradish peroxidase-labeled Ab-SpaA. The resultant sandwich-type immunocomplexes were separated by magnetic force and detected by measuring current signals using a magnetic glassy carbon electrode (MGCE) and the hydroquinone (HQ)/H2O2 system. Under optimal experimental conditions, the developed EMBI showed a linear relationship between the peak current and the logarithmic value of LGG concentration ranging from 2.56 × 103 to 2.56 × 107 CFU mL−1 with a detection limit of 22 CFU mL−1. EMBI detection is LGG specific, and no cross-reaction was observed for tested strains of other lactic acid bacterial species. The EMBI was successfully applied for LGG determination in commercial milk, yogurt, milk beverage products, and spiked dairy samples, with a recovery rate in the range of 91.74–108.67%. The entire detection process could be completed within 3 h. The proposed biosensor shows low-cost, rapid response, and high sensitivity and specificity and could be a promising technique for quality detection and functional evaluation of probiotic products containing LGG.

Keywords

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Immunomagnetic beads Electrochemical detection Dairy products 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31371806 and 31601535), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant number BK20160459), the Priority Academic Program Development of the Department of Education of Jiangsu Province (grant number 15KJA550004 and 16KJB550008), and a grant from Yangzhou University Science and Technology Innovation Team (2016).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Author Yu Xue declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Dong-lei Jiang declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Qin Hu declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Sheng-qi Rao declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Lu Gao declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Zhen-quan Yang declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Achilleos C, Berthier F (2013) Quantitative PCR for the specific quantification of Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus paracasei and its interest for Lactococcus lactis in cheese samples. Food Microbiol 36:286–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves RC, Pimentel FB, Nouws HP, Marques RC, Gonzálezgarcía MB, Oliveira MB, Deleruematos C (2015) Detection of Ara h 1 (a major peanut allergen) in food using an electrochemical gold nanoparticle-coated screen-printed immunosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 64:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu S, Chatterjee M, Ganguly S, Chandra PK (2007) Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in persistent diarrhea in Indian children: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Gastroenterol 41:756–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandt K, Alatossava T (2003) Specific identification of certain probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains with PCR primers based on phage-related sequences. Int J Food Microbiol 84:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bunthof CJ, Bloemen K, Breeuwer P, Rombouts FM, Abee T (2001) Flow cytometric assessment of viability of lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2326–2335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conzuelo F, Gamella M, Campuzano S, Reviejo AJ, Pingarrón JM (2012) Disposable amperometric magneto-immunosensor for direct detection of tetracyclines antibiotics residues in milk. Anal Chim Acta 737:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis C (2014) Enumeration of probiotic strains: review of culture-dependent and alternative techniques to quantify viable bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 103:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Debmandal M, Mandal S, Pal NK (2012) Detection of intestinal colonization of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus by stool culture in modified selective media. Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doron S, Snydman DR, Gorbach SL (2005) Lactobacillus GG: bacteriology and clinical applications. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 34:483–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drouault S, Corthier G, Ehrlich SD, Renault P (1999) Survival, physiology, and lysis of Lactococcus lactis in the digestive tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4881Google Scholar
  11. Duez H et al (2010) A colony immunoblotting method for quantitative detection of a Bifidobacterium animalis probiotic strain in human faeces. J Appl Microbiol 88:1019–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erdem A, Pividori MI, Lermo A, Bonanni A, Valle MD, Alegret S (2006) Genomagnetic assay based on label-free electrochemical detection using magneto-composite electrodes. Sens Actuators B 114:591–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO (2002) Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in foodGoogle Scholar
  14. Guandalini S, Pensabene L, Zikri MA, Dias JA, Casali LG, Hoekstra H, Kolacek S, Massar K, Micetic–Turk D, Papadopoulou A, de Sousa JS, Sandhu B, Szajewska H, Weizman Z (2000) Lactobacillus GG administered in oral rehydration solution to children with acute diarrhea: a multicenter European trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 30:54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo S, Dong S (2009) ChemInform abstract: biomolecule-nanoparticle hybrids for electrochemical biosensors. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 28:96–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Han E, Li X, Cai JR, Cui HY, Zhang XA (2014) Development of highly sensitive amperometric biosensor for glucose using carbon nanosphere/sodium alginate composite matrix for enzyme immobilization. Analytical sciences the international journal of the Japan society for Anal Chem 30:897–902Google Scholar
  17. Hervás M, López MA, Escarpa A (2009) Electrochemical immunoassay using magnetic beads for the determination of zearalenone in baby food: an anticipated analytical tool for food safety. Anal Chim Acta 653:167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hojsak I, Abdović S, Szajewska H, Milosević M, Krznarić Z, Kolacek S (2010) Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of nosocomial gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections. Pediatrics 125:1171–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hossain MI, Sadekuzzaman M, Ha SD (2017) Probiotics as potential alternative biocontrol agents in the agriculture and food industries: a review. Food Res Int 100:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang CH, Chang MT, Huang L, Chu WS (2015) Simultaneous discrimination of species and strains in Lactobacillus rhamnosus using species-specific PCR combined with multiplex mini-sequencing technology. Mol Cell Probes 29:531–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huys G, Vancanneyt M, D'Haene K, Vankerckhoven V, Goossens H, Swings J (2006) Accuracy of species identity of commercial bacterial cultures intended for probiotic or nutritional use. Res Microbiol 157:803–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalliomäki M, Salminen S, Arvilommi H, Kero P, Koskinen P, Isolauri E (2001) Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 357:1076–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lebeer S, Claes I, Tytgat HLP, Verhoeven TLA, Marien E, von Ossowski I, Reunanen J, Palva A, de Vos WM, de Keersmaecker SCJ, Vanderleyden J (2012) Functional analysis of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG pili in relation to adhesion and immunomodulatory interactions with intestinal epithelial cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee JY, Park EJ, Min NK, Pak JJ (2009) Carbon nanotube based electrochemical immunosensors for high-sensitive detection of E. coli. Sensors:1176–1179Google Scholar
  25. Lena MD, Quero GM, Santovito E, Verran J, Angelis MD, Fusco V (2015) A selective medium for isolation and accurate enumeration of Lactobacillus casei-group members in probiotic milks and dairy products. Int Dairy J 47:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. M Č, Metelka R, Holubová L, Horák D, Dvořáková V, Bílková Z, Korecká L (2015) Magnetic beads-based electrochemical immunosensor for monitoring allergenic food proteins. Anal Biochem 484:4–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ranadheera CS, Naumovski N, Ajlouni S (2018) Non-bovine milk products as emerging probiotic carriers: recent developments and innovations. Curr Opin Food Sci 22:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruizvaldepeñas MV, Campuzano S, Torrenterodríguez RM, Reviejo AJ, Pingarrón JM (2016) Electrochemical magnetic beads-based immunosensing platform for the determination of α-lactalbumin in milk. Food Chem 213:595–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sakai T, Oishi K, Asahara T, Takada T, Yuki N, Matsumoto K, Nomoto K, Kushiro A (2010) M-RTLV agar, a novel selective medium to distinguish Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus paracasei from Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Int J Food Microbiol 139:154–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Salam F, Tothill IE (2009) Detection of Salmonella typhimurium using an electrochemical immunosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 24:2630–2636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shen ZQ, Wang JF, Qiu ZG, Jin M, Wang XW, Chen ZL, Li JW, Cao FH (2011) QCM immunosensor detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 based on beacon immunomagnetic nanoparticles and catalytic growth of colloidal gold. Biosens Bioelectron 26:3376–3381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smita S, Pawas G, Rameshwar S, Knutj H (2009) Application of molecular identification tools for Lactobacillus, with a focus on discrimination between closely related species: a review. LWT- Food Sci Technol 42:448–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang Y et al (2016a) A novel label-free electrochemical immunosensor based on functionalized nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots for carcinoembryonic antigen detection. Biosens Bioelectron 90:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang ZQ, Wei YF, Rao SQ, Gao L, Yin YQ, Xue F, Fang WM, Gu RX, Jiao XA (2016b) Immunomagnetic separation combined with colony immunoblotting for selective enrichment and detection of piliated Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains. J Appl Microbiol 121:1406–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang ZQ, Xue Y, Rao SQ, Zhang M, Gao L, Yin YQ, Chen DW, Zhou XH, Jiao XA (2017) Isolation of probiotic piliated Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains from human faecal microbiota using SpaA antiserum-based colony immunoblotting. J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1971–1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ye L, Zhao G, Dou W (2018) An electrochemical immunoassay for Escherichia coli O157:H7 using double functionalized Au@Pt/SiO2 nanocomposites and immune magnetic nanoparticles. Talanta 182:354–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yun Z, Hang Y, Yu J, Wei H (2016) Rapid and sensitive detection of HIV-1 p24 antigen by immunomagnetic separation coupled with catalytic fluorescent immunoassay. Anal Bioanal Chem 408:6115–6121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang X, Shen J, Ma H, Jiang Y, Huang C, Han E, Yao B, He Y (2016a) Optimized dendrimer-encapsulated gold nanoparticles and enhanced carbon nanotube nanoprobes for amplified electrochemical immunoassay of E. coli in dairy product based on enzymatically induced deposition of polyaniline. Biosens Bioelectron 80:666–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang X, Zhang F, Zhang H, Shen J, Han E, Dong X (2015) Functionalized gold nanorod-based labels for amplified electrochemical immunoassay of E. coli as indicator bacteria relevant to the quality of dairy product. Talanta 132:600–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang Y, Ge S, Wang S, Yan M, Yu J, Song X, Liu W (2012) Magnetic beads-based electrochemiluminescence immunosensor for determination of cancer markers using quantum dot functionalized PtRu alloys as labels. Analyst 137:2176–2182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang Y, Zhang B, Ye X, Yan Y, Huang L, Jiang Z, Tan S, Cai X (2016b) Electrochemical immunosensor for interferon-γ based on disposable ITO detector and HRP-antibody-conjugated nano gold as signal tag. Mater Sci Eng C 59:577–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhou CH, Long YM, Qi BP, Pang DW, Zhang ZL (2013) A magnetic bead-based bienzymatic electrochemical immunosensor for determination of H9N2 avian influenza virus. Electrochem Commun 31:129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu Xue
    • 1
  • Dong-lei Jiang
    • 1
  • Qin Hu
    • 1
  • Sheng-qi Rao
    • 1
  • Lu Gao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhen-quan Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Food Science and EngineeringYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina
  2. 2.Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety ControlYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations