Advertisement

Membrane Characterisation for Fractionated Dextran Analysis in Sugar Industry

  • K. AbrahamEmail author
  • S. Kunst
  • E. Flöter
Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

The separation characteristics of two polyethersulfone membranes (molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) specification of 4 kDa and 10 kDa) for the retention of different dextran fractions (T2000, T40, T10) from aqueous solutions were systematically investigated, aiming at implementing them as a preparatory step for dextran analysis in sugar industry practice. Ultrafiltration is used to cause differences in optical rotation due to mechanical separation of dextran from aqueous solutions. The membrane separation performance was evaluated using polarimetry and size exclusion chromatography. It was found that the presence of sucrose leads to dramatically improved separation efficiencies for both membrane settings. Specific cut-off values for the separation of dextran from aqueous sucrose solutions have been determined, 10 kDa and 50 kDa for the membranes with a MWCO specification of 4 kDa and 10 kDa, respectively. The data indicate that the basic membrane setting (MWCO of 4 kDa) enables the complete separation and therefore the analytical quantification of the whole molecular mass spectrum relevant for sugar industry. The combination of both membranes, furthermore, indicates that it is suited for the differentiation between a high and a low molecular mass dextran fraction. The application of this new approach for the determination of dextran with varying molecular masses at various contents in synthetic thin juices as well as in real sugar beet raw juices indicates promising prospects.

Keywords

Dextran Ultrafiltration Molecular mass Chromatography Polarisation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM, Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung) for performing and evaluating SAXS measurements.

Funding

This study was funded by the WTSH (Wirtschaftsförderung und Technologietransfer Schleswig-Holstein GmbH).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

K. Abraham declares that she has no conflict of interest. S. Kunst declares that there are no conflict of interest. E. Flöter declares that there are no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Abdel-Rahman, E.-S. (2007) Investigations on the influence of dextran during beet sugar production with special focus on crystal growth and morphology. PhD. BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Abraham, K., & Flöter, E. (2018). New approaches for the determination of dextran in the sugar production process. Sugar Industry Google Scholar
  3. Antoniou E, Themistou E, Sarkar B, Tsianou M, Alexandridis P (2010) Structure and dynamics of dextran in binary mixtures of a good and a bad solvent. Colloid Polym Sci 288:1301–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aquino FW, Franco DW (2009) Molecular mass distribution of dextran in Brazilian sugar and insoluble deposits of cachaça. Food Chem 114:1391–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker RW (2004) Membrane technology and applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belitz H-D, Grosch W, Schiberle P (2008) Lehrbuch der Lebensmittelchemie: 6. Auflage. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergmann A, Orthaber D, Scherf G, Glatter O (2000) Improvement of SAXS measurements on Kratky slit systems by Göbel mirrors and imaging-plate detectors. J Appl Crystallogr 33:869–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breßler I, Kohlbrecher J, Thünemann AF (2015) SASfit: a tool for small-angle scattering data analysis using a library of analytical expressions. J Appl Crystallogr 48:1587–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, J. C., & Chou, C. C. (1993) Cane sugar handbook: a manual for cane sugar manufacturers and their chemists: WileyGoogle Scholar
  10. Day DF, Sarkar D (1986) Methods of analysis for dextran in sugar molasses and juice. Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol:748–754Google Scholar
  11. Gasciolli V, Choplin L, Paul F, Monsan P (1991) Viscous properties and molecular characterization of enzymtically size-controlled oligodextrans in aqueous solutions. J Biotechnol:192–202Google Scholar
  12. Hamid N, Ismail AF, Matsuura T, Zularisam AW, Lau WJ, Yuliwati E, Abdullah MS (2011) Morphological and separation performance study of polysulfone/titanium dioxide (PSF/TiO2) ultrafiltration membranes for humic acid removal. Desalination 273:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hirata Y, Sano Y, Aoki M, Shohji H, Katoh S, Abe J-i, Hitsukuri S, Yamamoto H (2003) Small-angle X-ray scattering studies of moderately concentrated dextran solution. Carbohydr Polym 53:331–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ICUMSA (ed) (2011) ICUMSA method book. Dr. Albert Bartens KG, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee G, Nowak W, Jaroniec J, Zhang Q, Marszalek PE (2004) Molecular dynamics simulations of forced conformational transitions in 1,6-linked polysaccharides. Biophys J 87:1456–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morris GA, Ralet M-C (2012) The effect of neutral sugar distribution on the dilute solution conformation of sugar beet pectin. Carbohydr Polym 88:1488–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Orthaber D, Bergmann A, Glatter O (2000) SAXS experiments on absolute scale with Kratky systems using water as a secondary standard. J Appl Crystallogr 33:218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pasch H, Trathnigg B (1998) HPLC of polymers. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  19. Promraksa, A. (2008) Reduction of dextran contamination in raw sugar production. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemical EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  20. Tvaroska I, Pérez S, Marchessault R (1978) Conformational analysis of (1 → 6)-alpha-D-glucan. Carbohydr Res:97–106Google Scholar
  21. van der Poel PW, Schiweck H, Schwartz T (1998) Sugar technology: beet and cane sugar manufacture. Dr. Albert Bartens KG, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  22. Wojtczak M, Gruska R, MIkos P, Antczak-Chrobot A (2015) Dextran molecular mass effect on particle size distribution of CaCO3 for 1st and 2nd carbonatation. Sugar Industry:703–706Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food Process EngineeringTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.SternEnzymAhrensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations