Advertisement

Food Analytical Methods

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 687–696 | Cite as

Silane Coupling Agents Modified Silica and Graphene Oxide Materials for Determination of Sulfamerazine and Sulfameter in Milk by HPLC

  • Yaying Lv
  • Qilin Deng
  • Kyung Ho Row
  • Tao ZhuEmail author
Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

Silica and graphene oxide were separately modified by using three different kinds of silane coupling agents, including (3-chloropropyl)-trimethoxysilane (NQ54), 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (KH570), and (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (KH550). The characterization of obtained materials was tested by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy, and the electronegativity was determined by Zetasizer Nano ZSP. The obtained materials were used to determine the sulfamerazine and sulfameter by ultrasonic-assisted dispersive solid-phase extraction. The static sorption experiment showed that the graphene oxide modified by NQ54 had a good sorption ability for two targets. Under the optimal condition, a reliable analytical method was developed for high recognition towards two targets in milk by NQ54-modified graphene oxide with satisfactory extraction recoveries (sulfamerazine 96.75% and sulfameter 94.08%, respectively). The recoveries of proposed method at three spiked levels were 92.16–101.71% and 92.95–103.81%, respectively, with the relative standard deviation less than 3.20%. It was indicated that graphene oxide modified by NQ-54 showed better performance for two targets, and the proposed method had been successfully applied for the determination of sulfonamides sample in milk.

Keywords

Terminal chlorine Graphene oxide Silane coupling agent Sulfonamides 

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21808173) and Training Project of Innovation Team of Colleges and Universities in Tianjin (TD13-5020). It was also supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2015R1A4A1042434).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Yaying Lv declares that he has no conflict of interest. Qilin Deng declares that she has no conflict of interest. Kyung Ho Row declares that she has no conflict of interest. Tao Zhu declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent is not applicable in this study.

References

  1. Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Stajnbaher D, Schenck FJ (2003) Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J AOAC Int 86(2):412–431Google Scholar
  2. Bagheri A, Ghaedi RM, Asfaram A, Bazrafshan AA, Jannesar R (2017) Comparative study on ultrasonic assisted adsorption of dyes from single system onto Fe3O4 magnetite nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon: experimental design methodology. Ultrason Sonochem 34:294–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Came V (2003) Solid phase extraction of trace elements. Spectrochim Acta B 58(7):1177–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell WC (2008) History of the discovery of sulfaquinoxaline as a coccidiostat. J Parasitol 94:934–945.  https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-1413.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dasenaki ME, Thomaidis NS (2010) Multi-residue determination of seventeen sulfonamides and five tetracyclines in fish tissue using a multi-stage LC–ESI–MS/MS approach based on advanced mass spectrometric techniques. Anal Chim Acta 672:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dashamiri S, Ghaedi M, Asfaram A, Zare F, Wang S (2017) Multiresponse optimization of ultrasound assisted competitive adsorption of dyes onto Cu (OH) 2-nanoparticle loaded activated carbon: central composite design. Ultrason Sonochem 34:343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di0074tmar T, Koch B, Hertkorn N, Kattner G et al (2008) A simple and efficient method for the solid-phase extraction of dissolved organic matter (SPE-DOM) from seawater. Limnol Oceanogr 6(6):230–235Google Scholar
  8. Gao M, Yan H, Sun N (2013) Water-compatible poly (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) polymer sorbent for miniaturized syringe assisted extraction of sulfonamides in milk. Anal Chim Acta 800(19):43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hernández-Hernández AA, Álvarez-Romero GA, Contreras-López E, Aguilar-Arteaga K, Castañeda-Ovando A (2017) Food analysis by microextraction methods based on the use of magnetic nanoparticles as supports: recent advances. Food Anal Methods 10(9):2974–2993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoff RB, Pizzolato TM, Peralba MCR, Díaz-Cruz MS, Barceló D (2015) Determination of sulfonamide antibiotics and metabolites in liver, muscle and kidney samples by pressurized liquid extraction or ultrasound-assisted extraction followed by liquid chromatography–quadrupole linear ion trap-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC–QqLIT-MS/MS). Talanta 134:768–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hou X-L, Wu Y-L, Yang T, Du X-D (2013) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes–dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of 18 sulfonamides in pork. J Chromatogr B 929:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karimi M, Aboufazeli F, Zhad HRLZ, Sadeghi O, Najafi E (2014) Determination of sulfonamides in chicken meat by magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer coupled to HPLC-UV. Food Anal Methods 7:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li YY, Zhu N, Chen T, Ma Y, Li Q (2018) A green cyclodextrin metal-organic framework as solid-phase extraction medium for enrichment of sulfonamides before their HPLC determination. Microchem J 138:401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oklestkova J, Tarkowská D, Eyer L et al (2017) Immunoaffinity chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry: a new tool for the selective capture and analysis of brassinosteroid plant hormones. Talanta 170:432–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Poole CF (2008) Editorial on “liquid-phase microextraction with porous hollow fibers, a miniaturized and highly flexible format for liquid-liquid extraction” by S. Pedersen-Bjergaard and K.E. Rasmussen. J Chromatogr A 1184(1–2):132–142Google Scholar
  16. Wu H, Gao N, Zhang L et al (2016) Automated magnetic solid-phase extraction for synthetic food colorant determination. Food Anal Methods 9(3):614–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Xu Y, Ding J, Chen HY, Zhao Q, Hou J, Yan J, Wang H, Ding L, Ren N (2013) Fast determination of sulfonamides from egg samples using magnetic multiwalled carbon nanotubes as adsorbents followed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem 140:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang YD, Zheng N, Han RW, Zheng BQ, Yu ZN, Li SL, Zheng SS, Wang JQ (2014) Occurrence of tetracyclines, sulfonamides, sulfamethazine and quinolones in pasteurized milk and UHT milk in China’s market. Food Control 36:238–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhao HD, Li NY, Li JW, Qiao X, Xu Z (2015) Preparation and application of chitosan-grafted multiwalled carbon nanotubes in matrix solid-phase dispersion extraction for determination of trace acrylamide in foods through high-performance liquid chromatography. Food Anal Method 8:1363–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhu DH, Nai XY, Lan SJ, Bian S, Liu X, Li W (2016) Surface modification of magnesium hydroxide sulfate hydrate whiskers using a silane coupling agent by dry process. Appl Surf Sci 390:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organic Solar Cells and Photochemical Conversion, School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringTianjin University of TechnologyTianjinChina
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringInha UniversityIncheonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations