Switchable Hydrophilicity Dispersive Solvent-Based Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Coupling to High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for the Determination of Amphenicols in Food Products
- 57 Downloads
Antibiotic residue has become a serious issue of food safety, due to the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria and their toxic side effects. Therefore, regarding the need, we herein report a rapid, sensitive, and selective switchable hydrophilicity dispersive solvent-based liquid-liquid microextraction (SHDS-LLME) method combined with high-performance liquid chromatography and UV detector for determining amphenicols in food products. In the off-line extraction procedure, the mixture of extraction solvent (butanol) and dispersive solvent (tetraethylenepentamine) was manually injected into the acidic aqueous sample solution. Specifically, after the fast neutralization reaction, the dispersive solvent was converted into water-soluble salt and phase separation was achieved. Under the optimal conditions, a good linearity was observed in the range of 0.27–50.0 μg kg−1. The limit of detection for chloramphenicol (CAP) and thiamphenicol (TAP) were 0.03 and 0.08 μg kg−1, respectively. Recoveries for the spiked samples obtained were between 81.5 and 113.5% and the relative standard deviation was less than 8.6%. The proposed method was successfully applied for the analysis of amphenicols in four food products.
KeywordsDispersive liquid-liquid microextraction Switchable hydrophilicity dispersive solvent Chloramphenicol Thiamphenicol
We could like to thank the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Nos. LZ16B050001, LY15B050001) and National Science Foundation of China (Nos. 201405141).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Weixia Li declares that she has no conflict of interest. Ning Chen declares that she has no conflict of interest. Zhongping Huang declares that he has no conflict of interest. Xiuqiong Zeng declares that she has no conflict of interest. Yan Zhu declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Ashwin HM et al (2005) Development and validation of screening and confirmatory methods for the detection of chloramphenicol and chloramphenicol glucuronide using SPR biosensor and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 529:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barreto F, Ribeiro C, Barcellos Hoff R, Dalla Costa T (2016) Determination of chloramphenicol, thiamphenicol, florfenicol and florfenicol amine in poultry, swine, bovine and fish by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1449:48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2016.04.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen H, Chen H, Ying J, Huang J, Liao L (2009) Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatography as an efficient and sensitive technique for simultaneous determination of chloramphenicol and thiamphenicol in honey. Anal Chim Acta 632:80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2008.10.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Commission E (2003) Commission decision of 13 March 2003 amending Decision 2002/657/EC as regards the setting of minimum required performance limits (MRPLs) for certain residues in food of animal originGoogle Scholar
- Commission E (2010) Commission regulation (EU) No 37/2010 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal originGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez-Torres R, Bello Lopez MA, Consentino MO, Mochón MC (2011) Simultaneous determination of selected veterinary antibiotics and their main metabolites in fish and mussel samples by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array-fluorescence detection. Anal Lett 44:2357–2372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2010.551693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Han D-C, Jin Y-J, Lee J-H, Kim S-I, Kim H-J, Song K-H, Kwak G (2014) Environment-specific fluorescence response of microporous, conformation-variable conjugated polymer film to water in organic solvents: on-line real-time monitoring in fluidic channels. Macromol Chem Phys 215:1068–1076. https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.201400088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ma S, Ye X, Huang P, Zhao L, Liang N (2016) Simultaneous determination of nitroimidazoles and amphenicol antibiotics in water samples using ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction coupled with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Methods 8:8219–8226. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ay02465c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shirsath SR, Sable SS, Gaikwad SG, Sonawane SH, Saini DR, Gogate PR (2017) Intensification of extraction of curcumin from Curcuma amada using ultrasound assisted approach: effect of different operating parameters. Ultrason Sonochem 38:437–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.03.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang H, Gao M, Xu Y, Wang W, Zheng L, Dahlgren RA, Wang X (2015) A phase separation method for analyses of fluoroquinones in meats based on ultrasound-assisted salt-induced liquid–liquid microextraction and a new integrated device. Meat Sci 106:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang T, Zhang D, Zhang Z, Han J, Wang Y, Tang X (2016) Synchronized separation, concentration and determination of trace chloramphenicol, thiamphenicol and florfenicol in food by using polyoxyethylene cetyl ether-salt aqueous two-phase system coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography. J Iran Chem Soc 13:1759–1765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-016-0893-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yibar A, Cetinkaya F, Soyutemiz GE (2011) ELISA screening and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry confirmation of chloramphenicol residues in chicken muscle, and the validation of a confirmatory method by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Poult Sci 90:2619–2626. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar